talk.origins

• Date Index

---

• Why DNA/RNA Instead of Anything Else ?, Luminoso
  • Re: Why DNA/RNA Instead of Anything Else ?, John Harshman
• Re: Dana Tweedy hasn't read the Bible cover to cover, Ye Old One
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dana Tweedy hasn't read the Bible cover to cover, Chris H
• Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, TCE
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Stanley Friesen
    • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, dkomo
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, r norman
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, John Harshman
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, dkomo
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, r norman
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, dkomo
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, mel turner
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, dkomo
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, John Harshman
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, dkomo
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, John Harshman
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Lexington Victoria-Rice
    • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, jenspolsen
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Luminoso
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, John Harshman
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Ken Shaw
  • Re: "Universal Common Ancestor" -- why?, Kent Paul Dolan
• Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, George
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, SeppoP
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, hersheyhv
    • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, George
    • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, Bill
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, Desertphile
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs Evolution Board Game, Luminoso
• whatever happened to Horvind?, Nick Keighley
  • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Ken Rode
    • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Stefan Kruithof
      • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Bill Hudson
  • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Thurisaz the Einherjer
  • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Dr.GH
  • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Zuca
    • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Zuca
    • Re: whatever happened to Horvind?, Perplexed in Peoria
• FREE DOWNLOAD OF AVG AntiVirus Free 7.5.430a828, amitr2007
  • Re: FREE DOWNLOAD OF AVG AntiVirus Free 7.5.430a828, Radix2
  • Re: FREE DOWNLOAD OF AVG AntiVirus Free 7.5.430a828, bill . m . thomas
• In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Radix2
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, TCE
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Inez
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Harry K
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Inez
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Joe Cummings
  • Re: In the News: Russian Schoolgirl Flees to Dominicana Over Compulsory Darwinism Course, Desertphile
• Darwin's "Origin of Species" on poster, Maxtile
• Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Kid Cool
  • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Mark VandeWettering
    • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, TomS
    • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, TomS
      • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Evolution Exposed by Roger Patterson, John Harshman
• Starting a Church Explained, Desertphile
  • Re: Starting a Church Explained, Pfusand
• News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., Ye Old One
  • Re: News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., Robert Carnegie
    • Re: News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., r norman
    • Re: News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., John Wilkins
      • Re: News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., Mujin
  • Re: News: Human metabolism recreated in lab., spintronic
• (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, Desertphile
  • Re: (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, Thurisaz the Einherjer
    • Re: (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, bhawes
      • Re: (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, Thurisaz the Einherjer
    • Re: (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, Desertphile
  • Re: (OT)[OT] Be careful what you wish for; WingNutDaily, jcon
• Re: Verizon isn't working too well, Luminoso
• Bronze age/iron age myth?, mccoy
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Inez
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, mccoy
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Inez
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, A.Carlson
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, JTEM
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, raven1
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, A.Carlson
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Desertphile
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Ye Old One
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Kermit
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, John Vreeland
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, r norman
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Paul J Gans
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Kermit
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Luminoso
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, _Arthur
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Luminoso
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Qualia
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, _Arthur
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Kermit
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, _Arthur
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Pfusand
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, JTEM
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Rolf
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Iain
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Desertphile
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Iain
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Desertphile
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, bastiaan
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Iain
  • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Stefan Kruithof
    • Re: Bronze age/iron age myth?, Bobby Bryant
• Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", mccoy
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", ouroboros rex
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Inez
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Kermit
    • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", mccoy
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Kermit
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Rolf
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", mccoy
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Kermit
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", mccoy
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Kermit
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Shane
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", A.Carlson
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Wombat
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", John Wilkins
      • Re: Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Ye Old One
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", A.Carlson
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", ouroboros rex
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Lexington Victoria-Rice
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", wf3h
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Rolf
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Iain
      • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Iain
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Inez
    • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Greg G.
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Ye Old One
    • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Inez
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Desertphile
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Mark VandeWettering
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", raven1
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Frank J
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Darkwing
    • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Desertphile
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Heinz Kiosk
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", wf3h
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", moxmaniac
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", TomS
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", liam_childs
  • Re: Abiogenesis: Chance or "Can't", Ken Denny
• OT: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
  • Re: Unblocking happiness, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Unblocking happiness, Vend
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
    • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Unblocking happiness, Luminoso
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Luminoso
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Luminoso
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Startlemyerfieldson
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Luminoso
      • Re: Unblocking happiness, Bill Hudson
• OT: Pinatubo radiation effects, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: OT: Pinatubo radiation effects, Robin Levett
• Hobbits are another species after all, Kermit
  • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Luminoso
    • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Kermit
      • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Luminoso
    • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Greg G.
      • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Luminoso
    • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Timberwoof
      • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Luminoso
  • Re: Hobbits are another species after all, Bill Hudson
• Dembski must be smiling, jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Dembski must be smiling, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Dembski must be smiling, coaster
  • Re: Dembski must be smiling, richardalanforrest
    • Re: Dembski must be smiling, jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Dembski must be smiling, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Dembski must be smiling, jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Dembski must be smiling, richardalanforrest
• OT: The personification of Truth, dkomo
  • Re: OT: The personification of Truth, textuur
• The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, T Pagano
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to, Heinz Kiosk
    • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to, Bobby Bryant
  • Chez Watt: Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought, Rowan Malin
    • Re: Chez Watt: Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought, Desertphile
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, moxmaniac
  • Tony puts on his black armor, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, jet
    • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, Ray F-L
      • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to, John Harshman
  • Message not available
    • Chez Watt: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, Greg G.
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, Von R. Smith
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index---CA240---brought to you at Harshman's request, Rolf
• Hi, challenger34
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Hi, challenger34
• ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, arcangel
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Tiny Bulcher
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Heinz Kiosk
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Kermit
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Stile4aly
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, raven1
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Desertphile
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Windy
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Vend
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Bob T.
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Vend
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, bob pease
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Qualia
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Thurisaz the Einherjer
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, JohnN
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, gregwrld
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Timberwoof
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, JennyB
    • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Desertphile
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Luminoso
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, raven1
  • Re: ABERRANT HOMOSEXUALITY, Greg Guarino
• "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, LSR
  • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, north5
  • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Ron O
    • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic", rmcbane
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic", Desertphile
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, wf3h
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Ron O
    • Chez Watt Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Faux_Pseudo
  • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, mccoy
    • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, mccoy
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, mccoy
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, A.Carlson
      • Re: Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Ye Old One
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, wf3h
      • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, A.Carlson
      • Re: Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, Ye Old One
    • Re: "Why I hate this intelligent design story. It's simply IDiotic" in today's Daily Telegraph, WuzYoungOnceToo
• Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Blodgett
  • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Ron O
    • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Ron O
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), John Vreeland
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Desertphile
    • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Desertphile
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Walter Bushell
  • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), dkomo
    • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Harry K
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), mcv
  • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), TCE
  • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), mcv
    • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), The Pooflinger
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Cheezits
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), The Pooflinger
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Greg G.
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), skyeyes
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Lexington Victoria-Rice
    • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Hilarious conversation on OE.com (Kazmer), dkomo
• THE TAROT'S TRUE IDENTITY HAS BEEN EXPOSED!, coaishdnr
  • Re: THE TAROT'S TRUE IDENTITY HAS BEEN EXPOSED!, Robert Weldon
• Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, JTEM
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, moxmaniac
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, sasam
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, wf3h
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, JPG
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, sasam
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, John Harshman
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Craig Pennington
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, riplin
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Desertphile
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, wf3h
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Geoff
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, TomS
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Ron O
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Harry K
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Mark VandeWettering
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Desertphile
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, TomS
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Desertphile
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, TomS
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, sasam
      • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Desertphile
    • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Googler
  • Re: Commentary: Evolution establishment has two different stories, Matt
• Commentary: Boson Bozos, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, JTEM
      • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, TCE
      • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Mark Isaak
      • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, TCE
      • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Mujin
    • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Elf M. Sternberg
  • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Dale Kelly
    • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Desertphile
  • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, wf3h
  • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, Desertphile
    • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, alextangent
  • Re: Commentary: Boson Bozos, mcv
• Proof of visual consciousness, mantaintai
  • Re: Proof of visual consciousness, Mike
  • Re: Proof of visual consciousness, Robert Carnegie
• In the news: Sweden celebrates Linnaeus, Chris Thompson
  • Re: In the news: Sweden celebrates Linnaeus, Ye Old One
    • Re: In the news: Sweden celebrates Linnaeus, Desertphile
• Re: TOBS: The Human Hand: "Instrument of Instruments"--Chance?, ngc426
• Doing his dirty work, Lexington Victoria-Rice
• If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
  • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, William Morse
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
  • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Baron Bodissey
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Baron Bodissey
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, r norman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Baron Bodissey
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Free Lunch
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Baron Bodissey
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, mathieson . dave
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, mathieson . dave
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, mathieson . dave
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Mark Isaak
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, William Morse
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, TomS
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, r norman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, r norman
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
    • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, richardalanforrest
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, William Morse
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, r norman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Harshman
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, John Wilkins
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Frank J
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, Ken Denny
      • Re: If not macroevolution, what is it?, TomS
• News: Andromeda Involved In Ancient Galactic Collision., Ye Old One
• Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Mike
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Mike
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill Wayne
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, George
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Baron Bodissey
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, ngc426
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Shane
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, George
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Rodjk #613
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, maximum maypo
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Shane
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Elf M. Sternberg
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Shane
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bill
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Shane
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, John Harshman
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, raven1
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, John Harshman
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, John Harshman
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, David Canzi -- non-mailable
    • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Shane
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Frank J
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Shane
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Timberwoof
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Frank J
      • Google vs. line breaks?, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Google vs. line breaks?, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Google vs. line breaks?, Desertphile
      • Re: Google vs. line breaks?, John Wilkins
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, David Canzi -- non-mailable
      • Re: POTM or Chez Watt??, Bill
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, maximum maypo
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Desertphile
    • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Paul J Gans
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, maximum maypo
  • Re: Michael Crichton as Scientist, Desertphile
• LA Times editorial on life sciences, Dave Fritzinger
  • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, TomS
    • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, John Harshman
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, Jesper
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, Dave Fritzinger
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, Desertphile
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, TomS
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, John Harshman
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, TomS
      • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, catshark
  • Re: LA Times editorial on life sciences, Robert Carnegie
• The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, T Pagano
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Vend
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you, John Harshman
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Turner
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, jet
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Thurisaz the Einherjer
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Elf M. Sternberg
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, junk
  • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you at Harshman's request, Mark Isaak
    • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you, Heinz Kiosk
      • Re: The Misrepresentations of Isaak's Index--CA100---brought to you, Bobby Bryant
• The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Iain
  • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Qualia
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., JTEM
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Turner
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Shadowin
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Puppet_Sock
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Shadowin
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Iain
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Ernest Major
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Greg Esres
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., raven1
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Ilas
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., skyeyes
  • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Puppet_Sock
  • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Chris Devol
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Iain
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Chris Devol
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Free Lunch
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., raven1
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Iain
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., raven1
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Mark Isaak
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Frank J
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., hhyapster
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Chris Devol
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., TomS
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Chris Devol
      • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Qualia
  • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Dale Kelly
  • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., Frank J
    • Re: The Irksome Thing about Creationists is..., TomS
• Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., richardalanforrest
  • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, T Pagano
    • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Greg Guarino
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, George
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Greg Guarino
    • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, SeppoP
    • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, moxmaniac
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, bimms
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, bimms
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, John Harshman
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Free Lunch
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, John Harshman
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, John Harshman
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Ernest Major
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, richardalanforrest
    • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, T Pagano
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, ouroboros rex
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, gregwrld
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Kermit
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, gregwrld
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Kermit
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: Simply more warmed-over neoDarwinian interpretation and speculation, stew dean
  • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Chris Devol
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Geoff
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., richardalanforrest
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Lee Oswald Ving
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Heinz Kiosk
      • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., TomS
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Codebreaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., richardalanforrest
  • Re: Oh, those poor misguided evolutionists...., Robert Carnegie
• Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Geoff
      • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Ron O
  • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, mcv
  • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Dustan
  • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, Desertphile
    • Re: Wells: Churches shouldn't buy into Darwinists' ploy, eroot
• The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, hbarwood
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Jon Fleming
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Jon Fleming
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, hbarwood
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, rmcbane
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, rmcbane
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, bullpup
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, A.Carlson
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Rolf
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, richardalanforrest
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Jon Fleming
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Heinz Kiosk
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, bob pease
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, bullpup
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, bullpup
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, riplin
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, rmcbane
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, A.Carlson
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Bob Berger
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Bob Berger
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Harshman
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Harry K
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Lexington Victoria-Rice
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Cubist
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Krubozumo Nyankoye
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Ozan Türkyılmaz
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Von R. Smith
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, rmcbane
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Von R. Smith
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, bullpup
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, John Wilkins
  • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Frank J
    • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Zoe
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Heinz Kiosk
      • Re: The Geological Column -- a different view, Frank J
• Letter to Richard Dawkins, Kazmer Ujvarosy
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Steve O
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Denis Loubet
    • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, John Vreeland
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, John Vreeland
    • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Desertphile
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Cheezits
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Gary Bohn
    • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Ken Rode
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Eppurevolution
    • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, John Vreeland
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Eppurevolution
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, noctiluca
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Vend
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, damnfine
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Desertphile
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, David Canzi -- non-mailable
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Ye Old One
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, mcv
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Jack Dominey
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, bramble
  • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Chris Devol
    • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Shane
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Chris Devol
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Shane
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Desertphile
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, damnfine
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, damnfine
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, Steve O
      • Re: Letter to Richard Dawkins, SeppoP
• The type of guy DaveScot is, rpmrpm819
  • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Lee Oswald Ving
    • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, rpmrpm819
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Rich Townsend
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, A.Carlson
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Shane
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Desertphile
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Dana Tweedy
  • Message not available
    • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, rpmrpm819
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Dana Tweedy
  • Welcome back, Ray. Was:Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Stile4aly
  • Re: The type of guy DaveScot is, Frank J
• God The Father on 5-8-00, eridianne
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Cheezits
    • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, John Wilkins
    • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Jack Dominey
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Desertphile
    • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Rich Townsend
      • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, SteveR
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Geoff
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Tiny Bulcher
  • Re: God The Father on 5-8-00, Shane
• Universal Common Ancestor, Kazmer Ujvarosy
  • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Cheezits
    • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Kazmer Ujvarosy
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, eroot
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Ken Rode
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Martin Hutton
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Cheezits
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Josh Miles
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Shane
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Gary Bohn
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Ron O
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Geoff
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Ron O
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, dkomo
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Kent Paul Dolan
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, JTEM
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Lexington Victoria-Rice
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Toni Keskitalo
  • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, ErikW
    • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, ErikW
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, ErikW
      • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, bob pease
    • Re: Universal Common Ancestor, Shadowin
• The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Kazmer Ujvarosy
  • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Cheezits
    • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Kazmer Ujvarosy
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Ken Rode
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, John Vreeland
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Craig Franck
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Delaware Dave
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, dkomo
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Gary Bohn
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, mel turner
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Bob Casanova
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Desertphile
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, richardalanforrest
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Geoff
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Blodgett
      • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Bob Casanova
  • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Desertphile
  • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Ross Langerak
• Belief tank..., David Canzi -- non-mailable
  • Re: Belief tank..., maximum maypo
• Human Origins Revealed, claudiusdenk
  • Re: Human Origins Revealed, dkomo
• [OT][Joke] Just keep digging., Ye Old One
  • Re: [OT][Joke] Just keep digging., alwaysaskingquestions
• News: Immune system 'brakes' found., Ye Old One
  • Re: News: Immune system 'brakes' found., Robert Carnegie
    • Re: News: Immune system 'brakes' found., Dick
      • Re: News: Immune system 'brakes' found., Robert Carnegie
• News: Sweden kicks off Linnaeus celebrations., Ye Old One
  • Re: News: Sweden kicks off Linnaeus celebrations., Chris H
• Money by Adwords..., Arnold
• American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Desertphile
  • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Ron O
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Walter Bushell
  • Chez Watt (Was: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design), Bill Wayne
  • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, richardalanforrest
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, TomS
      • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, John Wilkins
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Dizfriz
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, Desertphile
    • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, TCE
      • Re: American Comical: The Deceitful Critics of Intelligent Design, John Wilkins
• Research Survey, Aurazul07@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Research Survey, raven1
    • Re: Research Survey, alihortus
• Editorial: The brick doorstop, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Editorial: The brick doorstop, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: Editorial: The brick doorstop, Desertphile
• The fight to keep science offline., Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: The fight to keep science offline., maximum maypo
    • Re: The fight to keep science offline., r norman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., r norman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., John Harshman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Ernest Major
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., r norman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., r norman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., r norman
      • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Mark Isaak
  • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Luminoso
  • Re: The fight to keep science offline., Nic
• percentage of Creationists, qqq123
  • Re: percentage of Creationists, hbarwood
  • Re: percentage of Creationists, bimms
    • Re: percentage of Creationists, Desertphile
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Ross Langerak
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Desertphile
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Ross Langerak
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, art_classmn
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, JohnN
      • Chez Wattz Nomination (Re: percentage of Creationists), Desertphile
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Mark Isaak
    • Re: percentage of Creationists, Ross Langerak
    • Re: percentage of Creationists, Frank J
  • Re: percentage of Creationists, Will in New Haven
  • Re: percentage of Creationists, Frank J
  • Re: percentage of Creationists, Luminoso
    • Re: percentage of Creationists, Frank J
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, bill . m . thomas
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Greg Esres
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Luminoso
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Frank J
    • Re: Re: percentage of Creationists, Ye Old One
      • Re: percentage of Creationists, Desertphile
      • Re: Re: percentage of Creationists, Ye Old One
• testing..., Bobby Bryant
  • Re: testing..., FatBlackGas
  • Re: testing..., Mujin
  • Re: testing..., John Wilkins
    • Re: testing..., Lexington Victoria-Rice
      • Re: testing..., John Wilkins
      • Re: testing..., Tiny Bulcher
      • Re: testing..., John Wilkins
      • Re: testing..., Rich Townsend
      • Re: testing..., Bobby Bryant
      • Re: testing..., Dogma Discharge
• Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, SteveR
    • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, alwaysaskingquestions
    • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, rmj
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Ye Old One
      • Re: Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Free Lunch
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Shane
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Re: Bacterial Flagellum - Example of Man Made Equivalent ?, Ye Old One
• Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., neo
  • Re: Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., JohnN
    • Re: Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., Don Cates
  • Re: Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., neo
    • Re: Remembering Ferdinand Magellan In Voyage of Life., Mike
• known experiments in support of ID or creationism, aegis
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Ye Old One
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Nick Keighley
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Luminoso
      • Re: Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Ye Old One
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
      • Chez Watt! {Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism}, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Chez Watt! {Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism}, Michael Siemon
      • Re: Chez Watt! {Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism}, John Wilkins
      • Re: Chez Watt! {Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism}, Ye Old One
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, TomS
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, TomS
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Walter Bushell
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, TCE
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, bimms
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Mike
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, bimms
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Mike
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, John Harshman
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, bimms
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, John Harshman
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, eroot
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, George Evans
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Von R. Smith
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, maximum maypo
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, aegis
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Lee Oswald Ving
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, wf3h
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Ron O
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
  • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, John Harshman
    • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Frank J
      • Re: known experiments in support of ID or creationism, Desertphile
• WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Darkwing
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Andrew
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, SeppoP
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Richard Clayton
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Chris H
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Rodjk #613
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, jcon
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, A.Carlson
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, jcon
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Desertphile
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, John Wilkins
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, raven1
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, maximum maypo
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, John Wilkins
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Diane L.
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Greg G.
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Kermit
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Timberwoof
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Frank J
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Desertphile
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Timberwoof
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, John Wilkins
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Cheezits
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, moxmaniac
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, mcv
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Desertphile
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Chris H
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Mike
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Darkwing
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Dale
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, maximum maypo
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Frank J
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, A.Carlson
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Ymir
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Free Lunch
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Chris Thompson
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, raven1
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, mcv
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Free Lunch
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, mcv
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Timberwoof
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Michael Siemon
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, A.Carlson
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, JennyB
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Timberwoof
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Kermit
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Timberwoof
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Luminoso
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, mcv
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, JennyB
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, John Bode
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, Blodgett
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, bob pease
      • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, mcv
  • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, jcon
    • Re: WARNING!!! - These bands will turn you gay!, 9fingers
• American Usenet, neo
  • Re: American Usenet, SJAB1958
  • Re: American Usenet, Martin Kaletsch
  • Re: American Usenet, Vend
  • Re: American Usenet, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: American Usenet, John Wilkins
      • Re: American Usenet, neo
      • Re: American Usenet, dkomo
      • Re: American Usenet, neo
      • Re: American Usenet, TomS
      • Re: American Usenet, John Wilkins
      • Re: American Usenet, Walter Bushell
      • Re: American Usenet, John Wilkins
      • Re: American Usenet, David Iain Greig
      • Re: American Usenet, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: American Usenet, neo
  • Re: American Usenet, bob pease
  • Re: American Usenet, Iain
    • Re: American Usenet, mcv
      • Re: Re: American Usenet<