Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- From: Klaus <khellnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:38:52 GMT
Occidental wrote:
QUOTE
Developing energy crops could mean new applications of genetic
engineering, which for years has been aimed at making plants resistant
to insects and herbicides, but would now include altering their
fundamental structure. One goal, for example, is to reduce the amount
of lignin, a substance that gives plants the stiffness to stand upright
but interferes with turning a plant's cellulose into ethanol.
Such prospects are starting to alarm some environmentalists, who worry
that altered plants will cross-pollinate in the wild, resulting in
forests that practically droop for want of lignin.
END QUOTE
Redesigning Crops to Harvest Fuel
By ANDREW POLLACK
Published: September 8, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/08/business/08crop.html
This argument is stupid, anyway! It is more efficient to engineer crops to produce biodiesel, which requires much less processing.
Biodiesel also does not corrode various metals or create noxious fumes such as formaldahyde.
Klaus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- From: Occidental
- Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- References:
- Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- From: Occidental
- Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
- Next by Date: Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
- Previous by thread: Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- Next by thread: Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|