Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy


Ray Martinez wrote:
Robert Weldon wrote:
"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158003150.529246.259920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Robert Weldon wrote:
"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157922603.176974.148120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Tom McDonald wrote:
Ray Martinez wrote:

<snip>

Richard: I am sorry to see you lose your composure. Any person with
an
ounce of dignity would just completely ignore you forever.

So, of course, you would never pay any attention to a person capable
of
the sort of rant shown in the URL below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoRs3OceTLo


<snip>

This is the third time you have posted the link, and the third time you
failed to make a point.

Tom: What is your point ?

Ray

He is showing you a very good example of a rant. Stop pretending you
don't
know what his point is. Do you recognize the person doing the ranting?

First thing: I cannot know for sure what is being said because I do not
have audio listening capability where I am posting from. The terminals
are equipped -- I just don't have any earphones.

Next thing: I have no doubt whatsoever that Dr. Scott had his voice
very raised, and I have no doubt whatsover that Dr. Scott was using
expletives.

Are you saying that a raised voice and expletives = ranting ? IOW, what
he was saying doesn't matter, IOW nothing in this world merits a raised
voice and expletives ? This is rhetorical, of course, despite the
idiotic answer that will undoubtedly come from your angry keyboard.

I am sure we both could identify situations where both are needed and
no rant is present.

I also have no doubt whatsoever that you could care less what the
context was.

Last night on channel seven I saw a CIA operative raise their voice to
Sandy Berger after he and his superior let Bin Laden get away for no
good reason at all. I bet in real life Berger heard expletives.

My point stands: you atheists have no point against the man who refuted
your theory.

Ray


Nice handwaving and deflecting. Watch you don't throw your back out doing
all that ducking and weaving. Your only point is the one on the top of
your head. Your hero didn't refute anything, he just proved that he was a
liar and a loon, a lesson you apparently learned quite well.

Dr. Scott: Nothing infuriates the secular world more than a rich
Protestant Preacher....the Pope flying around in Shepherd 1 and the
gold ring he wears and the Vatican vaults demonstrate their hypocrisy.

Ray Martinez: We know the secular world is controlled by the devil,

The secular world is NOT controlled by the devil; it's controlled by
Evil Teddy Bears.

<snip remaining heresies>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tweedys Turkana Boy
    ... Tom McDonald wrote: ... I have no doubt whatsoever that Dr. Scott had his voice ... Are you saying that a raised voice and expletives = ranting? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Tweedys Turkana Boy
    ... Tom McDonald wrote: ... I have no doubt whatsoever that Dr. Scott had his voice ... Are you saying that a raised voice and expletives = ranting? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Vinland map and x-rays
    ... Tom McDonald a écrit dans le message ... ... >> SNIP ... smear Ken by claiming a connection to the cretionists and IDiots, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Does anybody know of a source for rearsets for VFR 800s
    ... <small voice> ... relative shortage of 1150GS, especially GSAs. ... when the fashion conscious buyers move onto something else then the ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: FMA 47 - Sealing the Homunculus
    ... One term conjures affection, the other fear? ... "Mama" was always an affectionate term. ... That's interesting, because the Japanese voice actress, Yoshino Takamori, ...
    (rec.arts.anime.misc)