Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: Mark Isaak <eciton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:51:03 GMT
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:24:27 -0700, UC wrote:
Skitter_the_Cat@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
(snip). (and more snip).
Death is a process. Even when someone is "dead" in the modern, clinical
meaning of the term, it is not like every portion, every cell, dies all at
once.
Agreed. I pointed that out above. But the brain 'dies' ratehr rapidly,
making the survival of the rest of the body irrelevant to all but organ
donation.
By today's technology. People who would have been considered dead by the
standards of a hundred years ago are revivable today. People who are
considered dead today may well be revivable according to a future
technology.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: Zachriel
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: snex
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: UC
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: Skitter_the_Cat
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- From: UC
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- Prev by Date: Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
- Next by Date: Re: Typical Arab behaviour
- Previous by thread: Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- Next by thread: Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading