Re: The Universe: It's All Math?


Al wrote:
Jon G wrote:
AL:
Who are you? Some kind of retarded vandal. Your capacity to respond is
clearly from a pimple faced, distructive conciousness.

The issue is that you are allowed to vote, Al

You had very bad teachers. I am sorry. But you still should not be
allowed to vote in a democracy!

two more things:

Are you friends with someone5? You'd really get on, you must have had
the same teachers.

Statistically, people who don't understand statistics are more prone to
believing in superstition, religion, the supernatural, ghosts, luck,
misfortune, destiny, fate...

Study math's, even a short basic course. or at least logic.

example: if you throw a coin 3 times and it's heads, tail, tail. What
do you expect at the next draw?

This is stats at primary school level.

Or what's the probability of getting two people of the same sex, if you
randomly pull 3 people from a croud

Don't answer, I'm only joking!

My whole argument is statistics applied to pure random definition.

What is "pure random definition"?
How do you apply statistics to a definition? Or should that be ...to
definition"? The grammar implies a collective noun, but that makes no
sense.

What would impure random be? If this part of some refutation of
evolutionary science? You have surely been told that evolution is not a
random process.

It's
absurd. Stochastics are a pretend attempt to get random to be
randomness;

When you use words in a deeply personal way, then you have surrendered
the right to demand people understand and accept your ideas.

something more "manageable" than random.

Perhaps - and this may be an alien concept to you - stochastic
processes are how the universe sometimes works.

The odds of human
observance coming into existance from big bang is as absurd as it gets.

This is the only sentence you make that is clearly sensible.
Unfortunately, it is also as wrong as it gets, and demonstrates a
profound ignorance of math.
1. We have no way of figuring out the odds of anything yet. We do not
know how likely are Earth-like planets, life, or intelligence.
2. Humans are not the goal.
3. We have no ideas of how many universes there are, or the true extent
of this one, or how different they may be.

You have had easy to understand examples given to you, and still you
repeat this. You lack either the ability to understand simple math, or
the desire to learn, or fundamental intellectual honesty.

Kermit

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Universe: Its All Math?
    ... The issue is that you are allowed to vote, ... You had very bad teachers. ... My whole argument is statistics applied to pure random definition. ... observance coming into existance from big bang is as absurd as it gets. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Universe: Its All Math?
    ... The issue is that you are allowed to vote, ... You had very bad teachers. ... people who don't understand statistics are more prone to ... if you throw a coin 3 times and it's heads, tail, tail. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Universe: Its All Math?
    ... The issue is that you are allowed to vote, ... You had very bad teachers. ... My whole argument is statistics applied to pure random definition. ... creation by a designer, but I do not see that you have proven there ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: why is probability and statistics a hard subject?
    ... statistics, which is hard for me to pint point. ... The book does not touch the calculus ... Different texts use different words and sometimes simply reading ... It is clear teachers do more then simply set the pace. ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: (OT) The Barack backlash
    ... considering she is not pro choice - to the extreme. ... Then why would you vote for Barry? ... Because Democrats (and especially teachers) can't cross party lines, ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)