Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?


"Bobby Bryant" <bdbryant@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VY8Lg.8330$q63.4656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article
<timberwoof.spam-E29945.23263404092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

How much did the rancher pay for the radiocarbon dating? What
laboratory did he send the sample to?

If a complete stranger walks in with a box of bones of unknown
provenance, will a respectable lab even take on the job?

--
Bobby Bryant
Reno, Nevada

Remove your hat to reply by e-mail.

The point of the post is lost by a discussion of radiocarbon accuracy

I see the point is to illustrate that
scientnfic attempts to date anything are laughably inaccurate and easily
faked
This shows that Science sucks and the Bible is Right

Dr. S



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
    ... If a complete stranger walks in with a box of bones of unknown ... provenance, will a respectable lab even take on the job? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
    ... If a complete stranger walks in with a box of bones of unknown ... provenance, will a respectable lab even take on the job? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: value of relics?
    ... >several of the bones found in the sarchophagus. ... The provenance ... >documentation is irrefutable. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
    ... Bobby Bryant wrote: ... provenance, will a respectable lab even take on the job? ... unleashing at least a decade of accusations of "shenanigans" and ...
    (talk.origins)
  • value of relics?
    ... several of the bones found in the sarchophagus. ... The provenance ... documentation is irrefutable. ...
    (sci.archaeology)