talk.origins

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: jaberwocky
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: jaberwocky
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: wade
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Desertphile
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: jaberwocky
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: The creationists are advertising
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: bob
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Zachriel
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Teleological evolution
  • From: seemysig
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: rmj
• Re: The creationists are advertising
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Jordan
• Re: Islamofascists want to kill you.
  • From: Psycho Dave
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Turner
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Jordan
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: rmj
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Jordan
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Jordan
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Gman
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Turner
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Jordan
• RNA World
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Jordan
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Nathan Urban
• Re: Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: James Laurenson
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: The creationists are advertising
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Coulter takes on Darwinianity
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Islamofascists want to kill you.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Turner
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Michigan: Lawmakers get more time to weigh in on science standards
  • From: wvantwiller
• Thought experiment with robots and monkeys
  • From: jaberwocky
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Film Review: Endangered Evolutionists: A new film ponders the popularity of "intelligent design."
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Coulter takes on Darwinianity
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Michael Altarriba
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Teleological evolution
  • From: Dick
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: John Harshman
• The creationists are advertising
  • From: seemysig
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Dick
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Vend
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Vend
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Marc
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Hugh Ross in Toronto
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Adam Grinter
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: TomS
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: TomS
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: shooty
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: eroot
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: bullpup
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Nashton
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: TomS
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: TomS
• Teleological evolution
  • From: seemysig
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Windy
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: amoritz
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: Daniel Jackson
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Coding DNA in Humans
  • From: Windy
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: abiogenesis via a metabolic network
  • From: seemysig
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: ErikW
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: kerravon
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: DONT BREAK UP MAKE UP
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Coding DNA in Humans
  • From: z
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Chez Watt : Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: computer simulation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• computer simulation
  • From: kerravon
• Re: History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: SeppoP
• History proves dinosaurs lived with people...
  • From: thegist2
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Wakboth
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Dale
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• [FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Sky
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Shane
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Sky
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Craig T
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: DONT BREAK UP MAKE UP
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: TCE
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: DONT BREAK UP MAKE UP
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Max
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: AC
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: AC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: AC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: Greg S
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Marc
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: CreateThis
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: DONT BREAK UP MAKE UP
  • From: Tohu . Bohu
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Greg S
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: A Big Question For Creationists (Or Anyone Else Who Wants To Respond)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: A Big Question For Creationists (Or Anyone Else Who Wants To Respond)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: John Harshman
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Origin of stimulus reception
  • From: rmj
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: More Ann Coulter nonsense
  • From: chosp
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Shane
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Sla#s
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Fangren
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: DJT
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Klaus
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: William Morse
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: bullpup
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: josephus
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: DJT
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Big Bang?
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Max
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: DJT
• Big Bang?
  • From: Pahu
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: DJT
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• DVD's slay evolution 'monster'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Max
• Chez Watt!: Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Unanswered questions (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: wade
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: josephus
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: dkomo
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: snex
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: bob
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Googler
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Googler
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: dkomo
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: DJT
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Psycho Dave
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: prospero33
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Ken Rode
• Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: r norman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Eric D. Braden
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: DJT
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: DJT
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: DougC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Does NYT Busines reporter understand Natural Selection?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Question on horse evolution
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: bob
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Kermit
• Question on horse evolution
  • From: Eric D. Braden
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: DougC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why school?
  • From: wade
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: r norman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: mcv
• Re: In the News: Creation Museum Expands Plans in Anticipation of April '07 Opening
  • From: firelock_ny
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Pressure"?
  • From: CreateThis
• Pressure"?
  • From: Dick
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: jellyfish & humans share homologies
  • From: Shane
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Psycho Dave
• Re: Children of men
  • From: mcv
• Re: abiogenesis via a metabolic network
  • From: seemysig
• Re: Children of men
  • From: mcv
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Children of men
  • From: mcv
• Re: Children of men
  • From: mcv
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: DJT
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Why school?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: c bit of an embarassment
  • From: stew dean
• Editorial: Board Puts Politics Ahead of Science
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Michigan: Lawmakers get more time to weigh in on science standards
  • From: josephus
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: josephus
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: LoL
  • From: josephus
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Max
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: parrotlady
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Max
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Most Americans do not understand (the mechanism of) evolution because most never received much education in science
  • From: mm2terra
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: eroot
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Film Review: Endangered Evolutionists: A new film ponders the popularity of "intelligent design."
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• LoL
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Film Review: Endangered Evolutionists: A new film ponders the popularity of "intelligent design."
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: raven1
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Nic
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Max
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Children of men
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: In the News: Creation Museum Expands Plans in Anticipation of April '07 Opening
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: DJT
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Miss Anne Thrope
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Max
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Vend
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: DJT
• Re: footprints, ichnofossils in general, and layers
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: jellyfish & humans share homologies
  • From: curtjester
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Max
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Iain
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Max
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Children of men
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• footprints, ichnofossils in general, and layers
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Woland
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Iain
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Inez
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Ohio: Scientists question deletions
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: DJT
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: DJT
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Unique adaptations in nonhuman primates
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Dave
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: TCE
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Dave
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: r norman
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Children of men
  • From: borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: John Bode
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Giant Sloth
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: TCE
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is Not the Chance Result of Evolution"
  • From: Googler
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Michigan: Lawmakers get more time to weigh in on science standards
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: TCE
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: TCE
• Re: Ohio: Scientists question deletions
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: In the News: Pope Preaches Against Chance Evolution: "Man is
  • From: Miss Anne Thrope
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Michigan: Lawmakers get more time to weigh in on science standards
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Miss Anne Thrope
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL
  • From: Miss Anne Thrope
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: DJT
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: UC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: UC
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: lucaspa
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Denial in Napa Valley
  • From: UC
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Denial in Napa Valley
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Woland
• Re: Children of men
  • From: borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Ohio Redux
  • From: josephus
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kermit
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: dkomo
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Too many Chez Watts
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ohio: Scientists question deletions
  • From: coaster
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ohio Redux
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Unique adaptations in nonhuman primates
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: jcon
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Miss Anne Thrope
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: wade
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Inez
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: Mark
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: Cheezits
• Ohio: Scientists question deletions
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Augray
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Dave
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: eroot
• Re: What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Michigan: Lawmakers get more time to weigh in on science standards
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: mcv
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Ohio Redux
  • From: josephus
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: JPG
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Windy
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• What one man is looking for in a Lover.
  • From: ebacherdom
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL
  • From: josephus
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: josephus
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: dkomo
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: josephus
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: josephus
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: question to you all..
  • From: Greg S
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• question to you all..
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: Zuca Treangeli
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: michael . palmer1
• GOD IF YOU REMAIN SILENT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK FOR YOU
  • From: ck19
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Craig T
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: jaylcole
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Shane
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro
  • From: Vend
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Children of men
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Shane
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: Inez
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: urbansombr
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Shane
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Children of men
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Shane
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Marc
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• OT: Racialist evolutionary psychology
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: John Wilkins
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: Kent
• Re: Children of men
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Earle Jones
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: AC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: AC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Shane
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: AC
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: AC
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: r norman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Martin
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Unique adaptations in nonhuman primates
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: In the News: Vatican Observatory head rebuts suggestions that he was fired
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: goodrich_ms@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Shane
• Re: Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: moderacaolula
• Re: Children of men
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design creates crises of science and faith
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: i am interested in genetics.
  • From: r norman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Op-Ed: Intelligent design creates crises of science and faith
  • From: snex
• Re: First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: In the News: Vatican Observatory head rebuts suggestions that he was fired
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design creates crises of science and faith
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• i am interested in genetics.
  • From: Mark
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Wyatt Faq
  • From: snex
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Children of men
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Ron Wyatt's permit
  • From: mccoy
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Children of men
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Children of men
  • From: r norman
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: r norman
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Children of men
  • From: UC
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: elcidbivar
• Re: Re:ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• An elegant early statement of the 2LOT
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: noctiluca
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: dgenglish
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: noctiluca
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Ohio Redux
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Iain
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Vend
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: CreateThis
• Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Earle Jones
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Fistpout Trebuchet
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: The CDesign Proponentist
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Iain
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Jeff Lanam
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dave
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: wade
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Inez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Re:ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: Bob Pease
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: snex
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Josh
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• OT: Senile, drunken hymenoptera
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Dwib
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Get Your Own Ark!
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Unique adaptations in nonhuman primates
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dave
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: nickmatzke
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Chez Watt entry
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Harry K
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Harry K
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: AC
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Unique adaptations in nonhuman primates
  • From: Manuel Doria
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: John Bode
• Chez Watt!?! Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design creates crises of science and faith
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Op-Ed: Intelligent design creates crises of science and faith
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: TomS
• Re: Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Ohio Redux
  • From: josephus
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: josephus
• Re: Why school?
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Spirals the Spirit of Life
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Wyatt saw the Ark !
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Josh Hayes
• In the News: Vatican Observatory head rebuts suggestions that he was fired
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: mvillanu
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Slogans are not processable (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Meaning
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Chez Watt entry (was: Re: Wyatt Faq)
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Creationist Schools List
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Three month anniversary of McCoy's Piltdown pronouncement at hand
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: June
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Desertphile
• First Modern Science Text on Intelligent Design, Darwin's Black Box, Celebrates New 10th Anniversary Edition
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Ohio Redux
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Klaus
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Three month anniversary of McCoy's Piltdown pronouncement at hand
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: chance
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: CreateThis
• Re:ChezChez WattWatt entry
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• OT: Meaning
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: snex
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Shane
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Fitness Training Program and Fitness Equipment
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Wyatt saw the Ark !
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: r norman
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Chez Watt entry
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: bullpup
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Phylloxera
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Fitness Training Program and Fitness Equipment
  • From: wwwblentoo
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Frank J
• Fitness Training Program and Fitness Equipment
  • From: wwwblentoo
• Re: Creationist Schools List
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: raven1
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Phylloxera
  • From: UC
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Inez
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: UC
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: raven1
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Mohammed Aaron Clausen
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Chez Watt entry (was: Re: Wyatt Faq)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Ken Aaker
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Draccus
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Spirals the Spirit of Life
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Wyatt saw the Ark !
  • From: CreateThis
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Spirals the Spirit of Life
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Occidental
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Desertphile
• Wyatt saw the Ark !
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Al
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: john . 19071969
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Haldane's dilemma and creationism
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Wyatt Faq
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Inez
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Turner
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Josh
• Re: Mohammed Aaron Clausen
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: UC
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: snex
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: June
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Wakboth
• Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Susan S
• Pope: Don't Rely Too Much on Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: coaster
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Mohammed Aaron Clausen
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Googler
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Wyatt Faq
  • From: snex
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Creationist Schools List
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Turner
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: eroot
• Re: Wyatt Faq
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Turner
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: bob
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: APOCALYPSE
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: bob
• Re: Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: John Harshman
• Oh NO! We're ALL going to DIE!
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Evolution is wrong
  • From: Turner
• Wyatt Faq
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dave
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Evolution is wrong
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: bob
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Turner
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: Al
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Inez
• Re: Chez Watt:
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: God is a fractal
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Kermit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Wakboth
• God is a fractal
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: TomS
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: TomS
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Really complicated strata-oops here's the link
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Fistpout Trebuchet
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Jeff Lanam
• Re: Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Turner
• Re: Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Creationist Schools List
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: John Bode
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Lottery Winners Gamblers Logic Evolution
  • From: Al
• Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK"
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK"
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK"
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Spirals the Spirit of Life
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: UC
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: Al
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: UC
• Re: Chez Watt:
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Gamblers Logic
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Coding DNA in Humans
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Gamblers Logic
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Chez Watt:
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Spirals the Spirit of Life
  • From: spiraldog
• Re: colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: SeppoP
• Seanpit's immunity lesson for today
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• The Amish: A genetic experiment
  • From: UC
• colours used symbolically 200,000 years ago
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Why school?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: TomS
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Iain
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: JPG
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: JPG
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: JPG
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: josephus
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: josephus
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: catshark
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: josephus
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Jordan
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: josephus
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: josephus
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: josephus
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Bogus Hurdles Bogus Criteria (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: fireforeg@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: topmind
• Re: FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• FBI investigates Bible codes
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Iain
• Information Model of Evolution
  • From: Anders
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Earle Jones
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Earle Jones
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: coaster
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bogus Hurdles Bogus Criteria (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: Gman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Marc
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Coding DNA in Humans
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: arachnophilia
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Marc
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Marc
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Iain
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: DJT
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• OT: Winning the war on terror?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In the News: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: UC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: bullpup
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: On Faith: Or Why Crazy Churchies Choose to Ignore Evolution (ebacherdom.blogspot.com)
  • From: Luxorien
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: UC
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Dale
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: imutate
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: DJT
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: raven1
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Augray
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Augray
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Augray
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Augray
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Googler
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: eroot
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: DJT
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: eroot
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: eroot
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Rape Victims Don't Always Want Abortions, Women's Organization Says
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: r norman
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Augray
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Kermit
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: UC
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: UC
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Why school?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: imutate
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Augray
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Augray
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• Re: persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: Inez
• persecuted scientist or something else ?
  • From: imutate
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Inez
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Gman
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: AC
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: On Faith: Or Why Crazy Churchies Choose to Ignore Evolution (ebacherdom.blogspot.com)
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: TomS
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Bogus Hurdles Bogus Criteria (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Ron O
• OT:What would Jesus do?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ron O
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: TomS
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: DJT
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Jordan
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: bob young
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Bogus Hurdles Bogus Criteria (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Chez Watt :Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Marc
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Richard Forrest
• 21cm Not Required (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Bogus Hurdles Bogus Criteria (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Cambrian explosion bit of an embarassment
  • From: topmind
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Chez Watt! Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: indriko
• On Faith: Or Why Crazy Churchies Choose to Ignore Evolution (ebacherdom.blogspot.com)
  • From: ebacherdom
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Dale
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Shane
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Geoff
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Kermit
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Kermit
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Fangren
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: sigvald
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: children interact with other kids
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Desertphile
• children interact with other kids
  • From: Jesus Helper
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Marc
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Great Pyramid Excursion Debate Cancelled
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Desertphile
• Florida: State's "Holy Land" Mixes Faith, Fun
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: Frank J
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: APOCALYPSE
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: dkomo
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Nic
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Flagellum ID debunkers are under the mistaken belief that "Occam's Razor" is a criterion of truth
  • From: coaster
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: DJT
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: mcv
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: DJT
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: UC
• Chez Watt! Another gem from a bottomless source.
  • From: DJT
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Mark Twain in 1897
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: June
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: catshark
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Tom
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Great Pyramid Excursion Debate Cancelled
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Great Pyramid Excursion Debate Cancelled
  • From: DJT
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: Jon G
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: CreateThis
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Codebreaker
• on the evolution of religion inthe human species
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Great Pyramid Excursion Debate Cancelled
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Free Lunch
• Great Pyramid Excursion Debate Cancelled
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: Jon G
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: UC
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: pz
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Fistpout Trebuchet
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: catshark
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Gman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: jtem01
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: An evolutionist challenges me
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: TomS
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: DJT
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Nashton
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: josephus
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: eroot
• Cravin' for Love and Affection?
  • From: missy
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Frank J
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: despondent neuropeptide
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Turner
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Op-Ed: America's evolution from God
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Shane
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Darrell Stec
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Ankmin
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Marc
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: aufooter
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Dale
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Dale
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: peter
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Too many Chez Watts
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Nic
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: That wacky liberal media
  • From: wf3h
• Re: the molecules-to-man theory,
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Flagellum ID debunkers are under the mistaken belief that "Occam's Razor" is a criterion of truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: William Morse
• Penguins The Best Birds (More Evidence)
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• What a real "designed object" might look like
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Nic
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: AC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: AC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: AC
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Compared to Ram's ad hominem nonsense Jon's work is POTM material
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Too many thats...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: who's who
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Nic
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: RAM
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: RAM
• OT: Not "The" 9/11, "A" 9/11
  • From: Dale
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Father Haskell
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Marc
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: brian452
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: rmj
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Flagellum ID debunkers are under the mistaken belief that "Occam's Razor" is a criterion of truth
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: peter
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Chez Watt
  • From: Marc
• Re: Discreet Charm....
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: AC
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: ACLJ This Week with Jay Sekulow -- Intelligent Design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: There really is an EAC!
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Jack Frieze
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Nic
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Discreet Charm....
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• ACLJ This Week with Jay Sekulow -- Intelligent Design
  • From: snex
• Re: ACLJ This Week with Jay Sekulow -- Intelligent Design
  • From: coaster
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Scientists debunk 'flagellum' argument
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: DJT
• Re: OT: OT
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: AC
• ACLJ This Week with Jay Sekulow -- Intelligent Design
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: AC
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: DJT
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: AC
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: AC
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: DJT
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Dan Wood
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: UC
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: amoritz
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wade
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: UC
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• OT: Discreet Charm....
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: amoritz
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Kermit
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: rmj
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: UC
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dave
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: CreateThis
• Chez Watt: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Al
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: pz
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: mcv
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: mcv
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Gman
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: DJT
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Googler
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: DJT
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: neanderthals & us
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: jcon
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Al
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: jcon
• Re: synthetic biology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Sasha
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Al
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: Chris Rohrer
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: UC
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Ye Old One
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Gunnar Kaestle
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Gunnar Kaestle
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why school?
  • From: AtlasAxe
• Re: Pope announces.....
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why school?
  • From: wade
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Dan Wood
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Desertphile
• Pope announces.....
  • From: UC
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• attempt of illustration of the role of sexual recombination in (partly, at least) solving Haldane's dilemma
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: mccoy
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Al
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• OT: New Dictator Doing It All Wrong
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Caltech Physicists Successfully Split
  • From: UC
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wade
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: rmj
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: bob
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• The Starting Point Problem - for Howard Hershey
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: ways in which Judaism is incompatible with science?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: RAM
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Sasha
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Sasha
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: mcv
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Chez Watt :Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Why school?
  • From: wade
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Typical Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Typical *** Arab behaviour
  • From: UC
• Re: Penrose and Entropy
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Penrose and Entropy
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: wade
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ymir
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: neanderthals & us
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: neanderthals & us
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: neanderthals & us
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Augray
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Occidental
• Re: synthetic biology
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Rik Grandia
• neanderthals & us
  • From: TomS
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Al
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: shooty
• Re: Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Why school?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: DJT
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: R Brown
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: There really is an EAC!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: TomS
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• synthetic biology
  • From: TomS
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Marc
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dave
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: James Laurenson
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: qqq123
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: qqq123
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Sam Harris on The Infidel Guy Friday (Sept.8) at 8PM ET
  • From: DavidMills.Net
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Conservation of Value
  • From: TomS
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: TomS
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Really complicated strata
  • From: Iain
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Vend
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: josephus
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: mcv
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Yet more evidence
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Wilkins
• What evidence for macro-evolution?
  • From: thegist2
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Conservation of Value
  • From: Gunnar Kaestle
• Re: Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Really complicated strata
  • From: fireforeg@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Sam Harris on The Infidel Guy Friday (Sept.8) at 8PM ET
  • From: JPG
• Australia cops it again - Peter Brock killed in a rally car
  • From: Marc
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: There really is an EAC!
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ye Old One
• Yet more evidence
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: coaster
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Dale
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Sam Harris on The Infidel Guy Friday (Sept.8) at 8PM ET
  • From: David Thuleen
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Creationist and 9/11
  • From: steven . troxel
• Ping Harvest Dancer
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Gman
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: rmj
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Theistic Evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: steven . troxel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: There really is an EAC!
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: peter
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: bullpup
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• OT: Why do some people say they "choose to believe"?
  • From: teavee
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Why school?
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Shane
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Nic
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Chris H
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Bob
• Chez Watt Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: There really is an EAC!
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Nic
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Attention: McCoy being more entertaining than usual
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Re: Evomythology
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Robert Weldon
• There really is an EAC!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Nic
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: hamilton
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: who's who
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: who's who
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: raven1
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Frank J
• Theistic Evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Desertphile
• Evomythology
  • From: snex
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: mccoy
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Googler
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: Frank J
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evomythology
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Creationwiki takes them on
  • From: mccoy
• Sam Harris on The Infidel Guy Friday (Sept.8) at 8PM ET
  • From: DavidMills.Net
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: possible good news from Vatican
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Ye Old One
• Evomythology
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: possible good news from Vatican
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: James Laurenson
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Frank J
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: UC
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: Snidely F Whiplash
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Why school?
  • From: APOCALYPSE
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: mccoy
• Ark of the Covenant Dig Results (1995)
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: UC
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Sam
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Rebuttal to Talkorigin: Fossilization
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: catshark
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: coaster
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: UC
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: John Bode
• Re: THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: UC
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wade
• News: At Long Last!!! A Real Honest-to-Gosh Theory of Creation
  • From: catshark
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: john . 19071969
• Intelligence: Everywhere, Great and Small
  • From: Al
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Al
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: wade
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Al
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Woland
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: mccoy
• Re: THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: Kermit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Ken Shaw: Pinch Yourself
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• THE BEST CHANCE COMES ONLY ONE TIME
  • From: gecko_cairo
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: josephus
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Why school?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: neutralino
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Why school?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: bob
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Crikey!! Steve Irwin
  • From: Iain
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Important Correction (Ray Martinez)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Participant: Pope's closed seminar didn't focus on intelligent design
  • From: Googler
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Al
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Ymir
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Al
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: mccoy
• was evowiki shutdown?
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: The Grandest Cut of All
  • From: Al
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Why school?
  • From: bob
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Aaron
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Why school?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: bob
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Nic
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Ken Ham on Steve Irwin
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Why school?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: snex
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Matt
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Flagellum evolution in Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Don Cates
• The Grandest Cut of All
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Flagellum evolution in Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Flagellum evolution in Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: DougC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Shane
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Shane
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Al
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Shane
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: Nic
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wade
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: bob
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: Aaron
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: mcv
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: wade
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Iain
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dave
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dave
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: bob young
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: bob
• Re: John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Wombat
• possible good news from Vatican
  • From: TomS
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Ron O
• Re: John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Iain
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Ross proposes testable creationist model
  • From: TomS
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Seconded: Pagano's Hypocritical Hack Job for Poor Post of the Month.
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Marc
• Re: John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Iain
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: In the News: Furious evolution debate hits famed Kenyan museum
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: That wacky liberal media
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• no beef in their logic sandwich (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: gesres
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Maths?
  • From: Jeremy Boden
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Rowan Malin
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: Joshua Zelinsky
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Phil Roberts
• Re: Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: RAM
• Re: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Dale
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: Dick C
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: That wacky liberal media
  • From: bullpup
• Poor Post of the Month Nom: Jon mistakenly claims that the methods of logic are capable of confering certainty
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: how many of you have convinced yourself that you don't exist yet?
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Discovery Institute upset with Wikipedia
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: wf3h
• Ohio: Panel to consider guidelines for teaching controversial subjects
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Education Department Adds Evolutionary Biology to List of Majors Eligible for New Grants
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Education Department Adds Evolutionary Biology to List of Majors Eligible for New Grants
  • From: AC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: AC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: AC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: AC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Steve Irwin
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: AC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: AC
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Creationism in Ireland
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Theistic Evolution
  • From: snex
• OT: That wacky liberal media
  • From: Inez
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Steve Irwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: How We Dummies Succeed, Robert Samuelson article
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Marc
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Too many scientists...
  • From: snex
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Desertphile
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: More forced conversions in U.S. schools
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: Hark Talk BBC News 24
  • From: Martin
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: How We Dummies Succeed, Robert Samuelson article
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: John Harshman
• Hark Talk BBC News 24
  • From: Martin
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: wade
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: wade
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: Occidental
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Theistic Evolution
  • From: pz
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: UC
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Lizzardwoman
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Max
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Tweedy's Turkana Boy
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Al
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Augray
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Al
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Woland
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Michael R. James
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Al
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Woland
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Fangren
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Al
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Iain
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Kermit
• Theistic Evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Al
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Al
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Too many scientists...
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: UC
• Re: Life is but a dream
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: Googler
• Re: Steve Irwin
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Too many scientists...
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How We Dummies Succeed, Robert Samuelson article
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• OT: How We Dummies Succeed, Robert Samuelson article
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Life is but a dream
  • From: Dick
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• John MacKay on BBC World TV
  • From: Wombat
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Did big birds dine on human ancestors?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creationism in Ireland
  • From: elcidbivar
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Aaron
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• OT Query: Why is evolution discussed here?
  • From: arnoldweiss
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Global Flood? - Not in Egypt or India
  • From: dleaman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Steve Irwin
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Did big birds dine on human ancestors?
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Max
• Re: Did big birds dine on human ancestors?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: AC
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: how many of you have convinced yourself that you don't exist yet?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Inez
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creationism in Ireland
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Creationism in Ireland
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dave
• Re: how many of you have convinced yourself that you don't exist
  • From: Aaron
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: r norman
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: jcon
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: bullpup
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Nantko Schanssema
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: More forced conversions in U.S. schools
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: More forced conversions in U.S. schools
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: More forced conversions in U.S. schools
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Iain
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Intelligent Design vs intelligent design
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Marc
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: guscubed
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Burton
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: bob young
• Re: Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006
  • From: Shane
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: bob young
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: bob young
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Phillip Brown
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: bob young
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: how many of you have convinced yourself that you don't exist yet?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: raven1
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Shane
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: bullpup
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Random Problem
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Shane
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Mike Ruskai
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Nic
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Chatter Boring
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Nic
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ken Shaw
• how many of you have convinced yourself that you don't exist yet?
  • From: empress2454
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Nic
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Ray: A quote miner with a sock, but no evidence.
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Nic
• Ray: A quote miner with a sock, but no evidence.
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: John Wilkins
• *** Post of the Month for August 2006: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Adam Marczyk
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Dale
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Dale
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kent
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Kent
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: UC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: De-Minified POTM Post of the Month nomination (Re: Humans can't have evlolved)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006
  • From: Marc
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Shane
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: DJT
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Shane
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Shane
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: raven1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: jcon
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: r norman
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: mcv
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: raven1
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: mcv
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Mini POTM Post of the Month nomination (Re: Humans can't have evlolved)
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Chatter Boring
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: who's who
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Stuart
• Iranian Universities Affected by Secularism for 150 Years
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Steven J further off track than most...
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: flabbergasted
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: Augray
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: Augray
• Chatter Boring
  • From: Habib
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: Googler
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: UC
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: De-Minified POTM Post of the Month nomination (Re: Humans can't have evlolved)
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: UC
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Jon G
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: r norman
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: EoRaptor013
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Augray
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: UC
• Re: Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: What makes us human
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: dinosaur count
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Aaron
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• How many dinosaur species survived the KT event?
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Biochemisty and abiogensis
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: neo
• Re: Biochemisty and abiogensis
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Mini POTM Post of the Month nomination (Re: Humans can't have evlolved)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Brian Badenoch
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: UC
• Re: Biochemisty and abiogensis
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Mini POTM Post of the Month nomination (Re: Humans can't have evlolved)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Kermit
• The Universe: It's All Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Life/Universe- Made By Math?
  • From: Al
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Thermodynamic vs. Informational Entropy - for Dr. Marc Buhler
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: UC
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: r norman
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kermit
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: UC
• Re: Looking for quote on the designer
  • From: yapete
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: UC
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: Al
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: CreateThis
• On Math: Distruction of Life Is Inevitable, Not It's Construction.
  • From: Al
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Op-Ed: Wrong lessons
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Random Problem
  • From: Al
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Random Problem
  • From: Al
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bob
• Re: Rant: Darwin was a racist
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Random Problem
  • From: Al
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• What makes us human
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Random Problem
  • From: Al
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Inez
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Inez
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Inez
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: moxmaniac
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: Aaron
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: mcv
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: mcv
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: r norman
• dinosaur count
  • From: TomS
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: mcv
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Koppe
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Klaus
• Re: earth and us
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: Frank J
• What's with the Moderation Bot?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Klaus
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: James Laurenson
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: TomS
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: josephus
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Jail Break
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: mcv
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Jail Break
  • From: It's a Miracle
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: mcv
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: mcv
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Iain
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: Biochemisty and abiogensis
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Biochemisty and abiogensis
  • From: clemacetc
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Lokana Skydancer
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Robert Maas asserts that ID theory is a competitor of Abiogenesis---Will the atheist ignorance of ID theory ever end?
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Dale
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Steven J further off track than most...
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Wyoming rancher spoofs dating lab?
  • From: Brian Badenoch
• Re: Robert Maas asserts that ID theory is a competitor of Abiogenesis---Will the atheist ignorance of ID theory ever end?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Marc
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Shane
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: B Richardson
• Semi-OT: This YEC is "not a fundamentalist"?
  • From: John Burton
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: John Burton
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Burton
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: chadmaester
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: chadmaester
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: chadmaester
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: John Burton
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Inez
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Nic
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Robert Maas asserts that ID theory is a competitor of Abiogenesis---Will the atheist ignorance of ID theory ever end?
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: POTM: Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Nic
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: chadmaester
• Re: Steven J further off track than most...
  • From: josephus
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: chadmaester
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Marc
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Phillip Brown
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Op-Ed: Crackpot Christianity: Part Two
  • From: Phillip Brown
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Marc
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: catshark
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Nic
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: AC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: AC
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steven J further off track than most...
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: r norman
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: r norman
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: earth and us
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: who's who
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone2
• Re: Robert Maas asserts that ID theory is a competitor of Abiogenesis---Will the atheist ignorance of ID theory ever end?
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: glenn . spigel2
• Re: who's who
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: who's who
  • From: bullpup
• Re: who's who
  • From: Shane
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: earth and us
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• who's who
  • From: empress2454
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Muppet Hi-Fi
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: Shane
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Earle Jones
• earth and us
  • From: PL
• Re: Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Shane
• Re: Faulty reasoning
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Troy Britain
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: stew dean
• Re: POTM: Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Glenn Shaw
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Worshipping at the altar of science
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Ray Martinez' Epic Paper
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: DJT
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: DJT
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: r norman
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: mccoy
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Answers to "Tribal Programming" Questions
  • From: Adam
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: DNA carries information
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Humans 'hardwired for religion'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Dale
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dale
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Fistpout Trebuchet
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: TomS
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: gesres
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Support for evolution in the Bible
  • From: qqq123
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: josephus
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Re: Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Marc
• Re: Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: r norman
• Re: Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: LSR
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: mcv
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: shooty
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: TomS
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Microscopic Reversibility
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Marc
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Ali Day
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Iain
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: SeppoP
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: josephus
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Iain
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Iain
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: mcv
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: jack . mollier
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: mcv
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: ID doesn't come up at Gandolfo meeting
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: damnfine
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: mcv
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: glenn . spigel3
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: glenn . spigel3
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: glenn . spigel3
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• In the News: Pope and former students ponder evolution, not "ID"
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: bastiaan
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Koppe
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Adam Grinter
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Gould's Scholarship
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• POTM: Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Adam Grinter
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Zack admits testable (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: josephus
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Steve Irwin, Crocodile Hunter, dead at 44
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Dave
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Gould's Scholarship
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Craig T
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: josephus
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Dan Wood
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Limonite is not a true mineral
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• The Second Law of Intelligence
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dick C
• Re: VoiceOfReason uses the accusation "liar" out of arrogance and fear
  • From: RAM
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: rossum
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: VoiceOfReason uses the accusation "liar" out of arrogance and fear
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: POTM Post of the Month Nomination
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: POTM Post of the Month Nomination (Was: Re: Neighbors)
  • From: guscubed
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The last ancestor of all life
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Chez Watz: (Re: Neighbors)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Inez
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Kermit
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• POTM Post of the Month Nomination (Was: Re: Neighbors)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Delaware Dave
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: OvC
• Re: Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: Vend
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bury Setterfield
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: News: Mother Deer Can't Recognize Fawn's Cry
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: News: ID doesn't come up at Gandolfo meeting
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dale
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Towards an ID Research Program
  • From: rossum
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: News: ID doesn't come up at Gandolfo meeting
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Bryan Heit
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Re: Neighbors
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Frank L
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: bullpup
• Chez Watt: Neighbors
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: solar system
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: Augray
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Neighbors
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Neighbors
  • From: Logos
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: News: ID doesn't come up at Gandolfo meeting
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: OvC
• Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: j
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone4
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dale
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dale
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dale
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Ralph Page
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Don Cates
• Will this test pull the last failed repost with it?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Chez Watt: Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: OvC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• News: ID doesn't come up at Gandolfo meeting
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: josephus
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: josephus
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: dgenglish
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: John Harshman
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: John Harshman
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Ron O
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Jon G
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: bullpup
• Re: News: Mother Deer Can't Recognize Fawn's Cry
  • From: Free Lunch
• Chez Watt: Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: News: Mother Deer Can't Recognize Fawn's Cry
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: Vend
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: r norman
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Frank L
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Stuart
• Humans can't have evlolved
  • From: Logos
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• POTM nomination: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Ralph Page
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Kent
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: raven1
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: OvC
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Zack admits testable (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: TomS
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: TomS
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Shake, Wobble & Water (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Frank J
• Re: SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Zack admits testable (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: bullpup
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Mother Deer Can't Recognize Fawn's Cry
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Mallard Fillmore on ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Shane
• Re: Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Iain
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: spintronic
• Hitler's 'innumerable' mentions of human evolution
  • From: steven
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: thrawn369
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Iain
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Shake, Wobble & Water (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Diversion tactics
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Iain
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Iain
• Re: Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• SETI and DNA-ID are essentially the same thing
  • From: topmind
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Zack admits testable (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: josephus
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Commit to your bogus rules (SETI vs. DNA-ID)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Double Standard, softy on SETI (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: r = p / c (DNA-ID vs. SETI)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Diversion tactics
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Draccus
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID
  • From: josephus
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: josephus
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: OT: New species of conservative identified
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: OvC
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: AXIS of EVOL
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Diversion tactics
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Higher decay rates would have burned the planet?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• anti cefamation leaque says creationists trivialize shoah
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: AC
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: raven1
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: AC
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: solar system
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• a primeval soup would left geological evidence?
  • From: Danniel Soares
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Op-Ed: Wrong lessons
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: Letter to the Editor: Scientific truths often turn out to be
  • From: Frank J
• Chez Watt: Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: mcv
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Dick
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: AXIS of EVOL
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: Shane
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Letter to the Editor: Scientific truths often turn out to be false
  • From: JoeBussen
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: mcv
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: RAM
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Attention: John Wilkins
  • From: j
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Protecting one's genome from invasion?
  • From: AXIS of EVOL
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: matts2
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: matts2
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dale
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: Dale
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Chez Watt:Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: UC
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Education Department Adds Evolutionary Biology to List of Majors Eligible for New Grants
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Dale
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: UC
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: roger_pearse
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: UC
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Op-Ed: Wrong lessons
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Article: Why Darwinism Survives
  • From: JPG
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Augray
• Re: Letter to the Editor: Scientific truths often turn out to be false
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: What religion leads to...
  • From: UC
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Does Hovind have a green card?
  • From: wvantwiller
• What religion leads to...
  • From: UC
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Iain
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: mcv
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• News: Convert [to Islam] Says US Al Qaeda Man
  • From: Ye Old One
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: mcv
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: What happened to the pigs in the Middle East?
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Diversion tactics
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: wvantwiller
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent
  • From: Deadrat
• cuvier, correlation of parts, and evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Diversion tactics
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Googler
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Bob Pease
• Chez Watt - Re: Hovind News: Evangelist's trial postponed
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Adam
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Fangren
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Diversion tactics
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Gaia and Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Bob
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent design
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Papal bull session: Nothin' new
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Hovind News: Evangelist's trial postponed
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Zachriel
• Gaia and Evolution
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: dkomo
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Hovind News: Evangelist's trial postponed
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Some questions for the supporters of creationism and intelligent design
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Hovind News: Evangelist's trial postponed
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The reproductive strategy of the Ottoman Sultans
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Iain
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Harris shows her true stripes.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Telling It Like It Isn't
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Chez Watt:Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: r norman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The reproductive strategy of the Ottoman Sultans
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Cornelius the Bollocks
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Nic
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Lousy design
  • From: Dick
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Idoso
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: Dick
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Special edition of Witnesses' journal to explore issue of creation.
  • From: Idoso
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt:Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Funny where "Intelligent Design" is getting debunked...
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: mcv
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: Michael Ikeda
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Iain
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Evolutionary question concerning God.
  • From: someone5
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: mcv
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Chez Watt:Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Diane L
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Re: McDude!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Iain
• Papal bull session: Nothin' new
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: American Jewish Paranoia
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: test-damnit-test!
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Hovind News: Evangelist's trial postponed
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Does Hovind have a green card?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: josephus
• test-damnit-test!
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Lewontin: "NS explains nothing because it explains everything".
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!
  • From: josephus
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: r norman
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Does Hovind have a green card?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Dale
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: r norman
• Re: What happened to the pigs in the Middle East?
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• What happened to the pigs in the Middle East?
  • From: snex
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: RAM
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Dale
• What happened to the pigs in the Middle East?
  • From: casioculture
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: r norman
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: r norman
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: AC
• Re: computer model of eye evolution
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: Marc
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Frank J
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Frank J
• "Answering" Lenny Flank via the Quote Mine
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Frank J
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Does Hovind have a green card?
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Deadrat
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Frank J
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: G. Mack
• The blamegame
  • From: snex
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Sherwin
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Shane
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• The blamegame
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Shane
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: Dale
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Dale
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: John Wilkins
• The blamegame
  • From: snex
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: gesres
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: McDude!
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Sherwin
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Manny Feld
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Gould's Scholarship
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: Sherwin
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: gesres
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Frank J
• Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Cardin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: If Creationism is right
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: snex
• Does Hovind have a green card?
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Manny Feld
• The blamegame
  • From: snex
• If Creationism is right
  • From: Sherwin
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: r norman
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Kent
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: McDude!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: Sherwin
• Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Frank J
• The blamegame
  • From: snex
• Re: The blamegame
  • From: UC
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• The blamegame
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Chez Watt:Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Bethell reviews Wells
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: solar system
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: solar system
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Continents and Islands?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Funny where "Intelligent Design" is getting debunked...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: UC
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: UC
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: Desertphile
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: In the News: The Pope and Darwin
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: UC
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: r norman
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Dwib
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Funny where "Intelligent Design" is getting debunked...
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Max
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Googler
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Iain
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Iain
• Re: The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Inez
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Creationist Schools List
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: In the News: The Pope and Darwin
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Testing...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Ray Martinez
• The Pope should embrace evolution
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Ken Denny
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: solar system
  • From: Dick C
• Re: computer model of eye evolution
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: solar system
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Robin Levett
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: UC
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: r norman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Testing...
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: John Harshman
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: UC
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Rawanda: a religious nation
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Tedd Jacobs
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: idragosani@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: rev.goetz
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Robin Levett
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: r norman
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Aaron
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: r norman
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: UC
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: Iain
• Re: Another evolution poll
  • From: jrsp8s
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: The Scientific Method
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Tribal Programming Theory of Human Behavior
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: dgenglish
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: amoritz
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• The Scientific Method
  • From: UC
• Re: Letter to the Editor: Creationist seeks his own reality
  • From: Bobby Bryant
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: John Bode
• Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: snex
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: UC
• Re: In the News: The Pope and Darwin
  • From: Googler
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?
  • From: borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: catshark
• Re: I think I'm lost!
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Ymir
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Jon G
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Manny Feld
• Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology
  • From: snex
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous'
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Op-Ed: Crackpot Christianity: Part Two
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: gesres
• Re: Ark of the Covenant dig
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??
  • From: Kent
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ratzinger on creationism
  • From: MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• evolution and human health
  • From: TomS
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: Dick C
• Re: I blame Noah.
  • From: JohnN
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• I think I'm lost!
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Huge Creationist Paper
  • From: WuzYoungOnceToo
• Re: Darwinism causes people to stop loving each other
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: OT: Top Five Degrees
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Letter to the Editor: People should seek their own knowledge
  • From: moxmaniac
• Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?