Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!


Nashton schreef:

catshark wrote:
Nashton wrote:
catshark wrote:
Nashton wrote:
catshark wrote:
Nashton wrote:
catshark wrote:
Walter Bushell wrote:
In article <fc5ve2tfpaakh876ag120d5h4t3ibfu4un@xxxxxxx>,
catshark <catshark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ann Coulter is stunned!

No, Tasers don't explain those books of hers . . . it seems that she is
flabbergasted that she could go through 12 years of public school, then
college and law school, and still not know that it was Charles Darwin's
theory of evolution that fueled Hitler's ovens.
What a disappointment. I thought someone had tazered her, or hit her in
the head with a blunt instrument.
I know what you mean. I'm hardly a violent person but the exception
truly does prove the rule. When I <cough> did a version of this for my
blog

<http://dododreams.blogspot.com/2006/08/not-enough-not-by-long-shot_25.html>

I entitled it "Not Enough . . . Not By a Long Shot!".

Should you go there, though, you'll see a little assault and battery by
photoshop.

[sig snip]

You sound like a couple of bored housewives, gossiping and trashing
another individual for her ideas and books.
Well, I know she has books, but what *ideas* does she have . . . that
is, ones she hasn't aped from someone else? All I've seen from her is
style over substance; puerile arguments made "interesting" only by the
macho pose that excites some males enough to separate them from the
price of a book. Personally, I think they'd be better off buying a
vibrator.
Examples.
<http://tinyurl.com/p2se6>

Oh, you meant of her poor arguments. Then look here:

<http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2006/07/10/behold_for_i_am_the_giant_flat.php>
<http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/06/ann_coulter_no_evidence_for_ev.php>
<http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/06/anne_coulter_cl_1.html>
<http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070010>

That'll do for a start. Now, *your* turn! What original cogent ideas
has she had?

If they have anything to do with the alleged connection between Darwin
and Hitler, that would be a bonus.

[...]

Can you think for yourself?

You asked for examples of her poor reasoning and I gave you plenty. Why
reinvent the wheel? It's not like they'll change character if I spend a
lot of time taking her crap apart myself and typing it in here. And it
isn't like you are going to make any substantive response defending her
"logic" if I did do that. If that was the case, you could have started
already on those links. But then *you* would have to say something
substansive, which you seem allergic to.

How about exposing your own arguments?

Assuming you mean expressing my own opinions and making my own
arguments so everyone to see and criticize, I have. A fair amount, in
fact:

<http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/metaphors/>
<http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/project.html>
<http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/feb04.html>
<http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jan06.html>
<http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind.html>
<http://dododreams.blogspot.com/>

Where's *your* body of exposed arguments?

Heck, I'd settle for your just coming up with a set of Coulter's ideas
that you find to be original and cogent and defending your position.

I'll wait.

--
---------------
J. Pieret
---------------

Those who reject biological evolution do so, usually,
not out of reason, but out of unjustified vanity.

- Isaac Asimov -



You have no arguments. You're simply ruminating whatever you can c&p on
the Internet.

That much is clear.

Nashton sure sets a new world record in handwaving here...

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!
    ... Tasers don't explain those books of hers. ... style over substance; puerile arguments made "interesting" only by the ... You asked for examples of her poor reasoning and I gave you plenty. ... isn't like you are going to make any substantive response defending her ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
    ... That someone else might have a notion of "substance" ... Had action indistinguishable from a grand piano. ... gave you several _real and serious_ reasons to prefer books. ... you enjoyed the life of research. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!
    ... Tasers don't explain those books of hers. ... style over substance; puerile arguments made "interesting" only by the ... that you find to be original and cogent and defending your position. ... The difference between genius and stupidity ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!
    ... catshark wrote: ... Tasers don't explain those books of hers. ... style over substance; puerile arguments made "interesting" only by the ... So God is totally out of the picture, and humans are the accidental product of a purposeless universe. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading