Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: "Noelie S. Alito" <noelie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:45:43 -0500
George Evans wrote:
in article timberwoof.spam-0A79D8.15141520082006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Timberwoof at timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 8/20/06 3:14 PM:
In article <Ab3Gg.17397$PO.13832@dukeread03>,
"George Evans" <georgee3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
That depends on where the water was initially. If you put half the water inI don't think the atmosphere can hold that much water...
the oceans into suspension in the atmosphere, there is plenty.
Water molecules weigh 18 amu, which is significantly lighter than the two
most common molecules in the atmosphere, N2 at 28 amu and O2 at 32 amu. In
an unstirred atmosphere with no particulate content, ALL the water would be
above the O2 and N2. Now what exactly makes you thing the atmosphere can't
hold that much water?
In this case, you have to deal with the total supertonnage of water
in vapor form in the atmosphere represented by 600,000,000 (600
million) cubic *kilometers* of water ("half the water in the oceans).
http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/watercycleoceans.html
Consider the significant blockage of sunlight, the increased air
pressure at the land surface, and the total energy release of
600,000,000,000,000,000 liters of water dropping an average of
a few kilometers to the land surface. We're talking a Category
500 hurricane across the whole planet.
...Which begs the question of why it all rained out all at once that one
time...
Possibly the sudden introduction of particulate matter around which water
molecules could condense. This could be from one or more super-volcanoes or
asteroid impacts.
An asteroid hit would stick out like a sore thumb in the geologic
record, having something an order of magnitude greater than the
Chicxulub asteroid within the immediate geologic past (that is,
less than 10,000 years ago).
As for supervolcanos, none fit the time frame:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervolcano
...and how long it took to evaporate again ... and why it doesn't go on
evaporating...
Obviously it didn't evaporate again. It's all in the oceans now, remember.
Meaning that, before the Flood, we had a greenhouse atmosphere that
makes current global climate like a freeze-dried wonder.
...In short, that hypothesis is nonsense.
In shorter, wrong. Try again.
Noelie
--
Those who refuse to do the math are condemned to talk nonsense.
Those who only do the math are condemned to talk nonsense.
Some of the rest of us are condemned to talk nonsense, too.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- References:
- Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Inez
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: RAM
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: RAM
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: *** C
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans
- Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Prev by Date: Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?
- Next by Date: Re: Creationist Claim
- Previous by thread: Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Next by thread: Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Index(es):