Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory

In article <Ab3Gg.17397$PO.13832@dukeread03>,
"George Evans" <georgee3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The problem is that under "peer review" it was
shown that the possibility of a world wide flood brings the data
into question because such an event could have changed geology.

Except that there is no possibility of such a flood. There's not enough
water on the planet for it to rain steadily everywhere for forty days
and forty nights.

That depends on where the water was initially. If you put half the water in
the oceans into suspension in the atmosphere, there is plenty.

I don't think the atmosphere can hold that much water. Which begs the
question of why it all rained out all at once that one time and how long
it took to evaporate again ... and why it doesn't go on evaporating. In
short, that hypothesis is nonsense.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.

.