Re: Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- From: "Robert Carnegie" <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Aug 2006 09:06:36 -0700
NILS BÖRJESSON wrote:
Why do physics still think that it is a problem
that the cosmological constant is 1e-120 in planck units?
Maybe planck units is the wrong units for the
cosmological constant.
In Hubble-units the cosmological constant is close to one:
L = a.H^2
with a close to one.
This suggest that the quotient: L/H^2 is constant in time.
Maybe the cosmological constant is a variable
that depend on the large scale metric off the universe
because H(t)=R'(t)/R(t) is conected to the large scale
metric off the universe.
Comments?
What's the special significance of the multiplier 1e-120 in decimal
units? The universe is built on threes, sixes and sixties - 360 days
in a year, around a circle is 3 times the distance across it, etc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- From: Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- References:
- Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- From: NILS BÖRJESSON
- Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- Prev by Date: Re: 32 nations: science knowledge correlates with agreeing human evolution
- Next by Date: Re: The occurrence of abnormally high gas and oil pressures!
- Previous by thread: Re: Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- Next by thread: Re: Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
