Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:20:35 -0500, *** C wrote:

RAM wrote in talk.origins

George Evans wrote:
You have misidentified the villain. It is fundamentalism. Creationism
is still viable. It is not "unsupported by science". It is in second
place.

Provide some evidence of this "scientific support." And what exactly
do you mean by second place.

I didn't know scientific theories were in a queue.

If they were, creationism wouldn't be second, it would be dead last, and
would have to back up everytime another scientific theory was presented.

No, creationism would not be in the queue at all. It was once, about 200
years ago, and it reached the head of the queue, and it got rejected on
account of being wrong. (Which brings us back to the Subject of this
thread.)

--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering

.