Re: Curved space

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:19:06 -0500, "wendel.fendel"
<wendel.fendel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

*** wrote:


However, back to the subject, I understand we are evolving theories of
the makeup of our universe and life via mathematics. It has become
the language of the current priesthood. So long as it remains known
only to a priesthood, us ordinary beings must rely on renegades
willing to interpret for us.

Nonsense. Anyone with the wit, the determination and time can learn
science. Of course there is not surefire method of being a creative
person in science. There is no "priesthood of science". All it takes is
some study and work, assuming you have sufficient intelligence to do
mathematics.
Wendel Fendel

Actually, not all humans are created equal. As Personnel Manager I
was a believer in testing in making placements. I knew IQ tests had
limited value, so I added skill testing. One pertinent case I well
remember, involved a young lady applying as a secretary. I had a Vice
President desperate for a secretary. I told him of this applicant,
but told him she would not do well for him. He had an extensive
vocabulary whereas her strength was in mathematics. I agreed to let
him try her only after he agreed to give me a chance to place her if
she didn't work out. Surprise, neither were happy. I found her a job
in Accounting where her skills were greatly appreciated. Her general
intelligence was above normal.

In a different case, a recently promoted manager wasn't doing well.
In his previous assignment he did well and was well liked. His
concerned manager asked me to help. The testing showed above average
intelligence, with a special strength in his vocabulary. However, his
analytical skills were below average. His manager had made a common
mistake of equating vocabulary with intelligence.

Actually, higher mathematics is not a widely available talent.
Heisenberg was adept, but Bohr was oriented to philosophy.

Pagel, The Cosmic Code:

"While Heisenberg worked on the uncertainty relations, Bohr, in his
very different style, independently developed his own interpretation
of the quantum theory. Heisenberg's approach was to use
mathematics...while Bohr reflected philosophically on the nature of
quantum reality."

Pagel quoting Feynman:

"I think it is safe to say that no one understands quantum mechanics."

People do have unique talents. Higher mathematics has limited numbers
of capable people. Just as a musician can write music, mathematicians
can express their ideas in their specialized notations.

The problem in science is further insights into our universe are not
coming from direct observation and experimentation, it is coming from
theories. Testability is becoming harder. How do you test string
theory, how do you examine a quark? How do you describe curved space?

***


.