Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: George Evans <georgee3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 06:44:12 GMT
in article 1155232452.151383.267580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Inez at
savagemouse123@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 8/10/06 10:54 AM:
<snip>
Sasha's testicle "theory" is not based on previous observations, nor does it
describe the behavior of a related set of phenomena. Using this definition,
it's not a scientific theory.
I imagine there could be scientific theories of creationism, but I'm not
certain I've seen them stated that way. %0
You and Tom need to remember you are talking about the leading scientific
theory of the past during the Enlightenment. Were all those scientists
wrong?
George Evans
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Sasha
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- From: Inez
- Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Cretinists silent when asked "2+2=?"
- Next by Date: Re: Teach Creation
- Previous by thread: Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Next by thread: Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading