talk.origins
- The Origin of Chemical and Biochemical Properties,
rev.goetz
- OT: Top Five Degrees,
Jenny6833A
- What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
rev.goetz
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
John Harshman
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
Inez
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
r norman
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
wade
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
Manny Feld
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
John Bode
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
Chris H
- Re: What is the maximum size for a drop of water?,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Express Yourself,
seatonlinks-post
- Re: Creationism Vs Evolutionism,
Spanish Paranoia
- ITN: Dembski's "fatal concessions.",
Elf M. Sternberg
- ID/Creationism Promotes "Flat Earth Science",
CreateThis
- OT: Spain in November,
Rodjk #613
- Does Mark Kluge still visit talk.origins?,
Cygnus X-1
- Big Bang Rant,
jon . giuliani
- The long neck of the giraffe: a just-so story,
dkomo
- Limonite is not a true mineral,
mccoy
- Ark of the Covenant dig,
mccoy
- Charles Darwin has a posse!,
steven_pirie
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Cheezits
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
mccoy
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
DJT
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
mccoy
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
bullpup
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Harlequin
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
eroot
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Free Lunch
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Kermit
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Wakboth
- Re: Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Ye Old One
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Manny Feld
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Robert Weldon
- Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
bullpup
- Re: Re: Charles Darwin has a posse!,
Ye Old One
- Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
michael . palmer1
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
UC
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
MitchAlsup
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
HuskyPhD
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
HuskyPhD
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Jon G
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
TomS
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Jon G
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
TomS
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Jon G
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
TomS
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
HuskyPhD
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Geoff
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Larry Moran
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
UC
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
CreateThis
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
UC
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
CreateThis
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
HuskyPhD
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
AC
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Manny Feld
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Ye Old One
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
pete
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Denis Loubet
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
amoritz
- Re: Rant: Big Bang theory 'ridiculous',
Desertphile
- 'Why Darwin Matters' ESkeptic,
Desertphile
- FYI - Help a charity when you connect to the newsgroups,
BryanD
- Intelligent Design vs intelligent design,
Kent
- Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Turner
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
GSP
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
amoritz
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
mcv
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
GSP
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Noone Inparticular
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
shipmodeler1
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Noone Inparticular
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
mcv
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Geoff
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Manny Feld
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
mcv
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
mcv
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Kermit
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
MitchAlsup
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Stile4aly
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Monkey
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Turner
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
bullpup
- Re: Creation Heaven or Science Hell?,
Bob Pease
- Spice up your life!,
alfred.goncero@xxxxxxxxx
- Book review: The Evolution of Evolution,
michael . palmer1
- Did big birds dine on human ancestors?,
michael . palmer1
- Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
catshark
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Vend
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
UC
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
catshark
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
UC
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Dave
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
UC
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Dave
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
John Harshman
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Robin Levett
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
wade
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
TomS
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
catshark
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
macaddicted
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Larry Moran
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
John Harshman
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
catshark
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Larry Moran
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Robin Levett
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
catshark
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: Luskin: Judge Wrong To Rule Against ID's Theology,
Googler
- solar system,
Myself
- Re: solar system,
John Harshman
- Re: solar system,
Bill Wayne
- Re: solar system,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: solar system,
dkomo
- Re: solar system,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: solar system,
bullpup
- Re: solar system,
Bob Casanova
- Re: solar system,
Manny Feld
- Re: solar system,
Gordon Hill
- Re: solar system,
Geoff
- Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
The CDesign Proponentist
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
Desertphile
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
dgenglish
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
rev.goetz
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
lhcarter@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
jcon
- Re: Evolutionists are afraid to debate with Ann Coulter.,
AC
- Question for Anthropologists,
The CDesign Proponentist
- Evolution in Action: Dogs "Give Birth" to a New Parasite,
Augray
- Huge Creationist Paper,
tri***briel
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
The CDesign Proponentist
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Inez
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
jrsp8s
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
dysfunction
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Phil Sunde
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
CreateThis
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Augray
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Dave
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Desertphile
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Desertphile
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Desertphile
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
bullpup
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
bullpup
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Glenn Shaw
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
bullpup
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
guscubed
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Desertphile
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Dean Chesterman
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
John Bode
- Re: Huge Creationist Paper,
Frank J
- The cleverest creationist site,
Giant Sloth
- Schonborn, de Chardin, and Galileo,
Perplexed in Peoria
- computer model of eye evolution,
qqq123
- Creationist Unicorns Negate Truth,
GSP
- OT: New species of conservative identified,
Occidental
- In the News: Observatory exit not about evolution,
Jason Spaceman
- Letter to the Editor: Scientific truths often turn out to be false,
Jason Spaceman
- abiogenesis writeups,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Creationist Schools List,
Sam
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Fangren
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
David Fritzinger
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Cheezits
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Googler
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
r norman
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Emma Pease
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
r norman
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Free Lunch
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
r norman
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Shane
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
RAM
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
RAM
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
rappoccio@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
dysfunction
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Creationist Schools List,
markus
- Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
snex
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Sasha
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
snex
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Kermit
- Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
snex
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
DJT
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
SeppoP
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
DJT
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
DJT
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
mccoy
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
DJT
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Tom McDonald
- Chez Watt! Was Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Wakboth
- Re: Chez Watt! Was Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Chez Watt! Was Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Geoff
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Quantum Leaper
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
DJT
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Kermit
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Woland
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
eroot
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Geoff
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
jrsp8s
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Kermit
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Inez
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ye Old One
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
guscubed
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
CreateThis
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
John Wilkins
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
John Wilkins
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
catshark
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Kermit
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Inez
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Inez
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Desertphile
- Re: Noah's Ark and Iron pattern,
Iain
- Faulty reasoning,
mccoy
- Faulty reasoning,
snex
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Wakboth
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
CreateThis
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Josh Miles
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
mccoy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
mccoy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
mccoy
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
DJT
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
John Wilkins
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Kermit
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Josh Miles
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Mike Painter
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
John Harshman
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
jrsp8s
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ye Old One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Inez
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Desertphile
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Desertphile
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
bullpup
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
dkomo
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
John Bode
- Re: Faulty reasoning,
Ben Standeven
- Ratzinger on creationism,
mccoy
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
MitchAlsup
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Wakboth
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
wf3h
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
rich hammett
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Nashton
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Wakboth
- Re: Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
amoritz
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Nashton
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
david ford
- Ratzinger on creationism,
snex
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Fangren
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Bob Pease
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Free Lunch
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Wakboth
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Vend
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Desertphile
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Ratzinger on creationism,
snex
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Bob Pease
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
Googler
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
9fingers
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
AC
- Re: Ratzinger on creationism,
macaddicted
- Education Department Adds Evolutionary Biology to List of Majors Eligible for New Grants,
Dunc Harris
- Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Frank J
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Frank J
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
CreateThis
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
TomS
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
CreateThis
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Frank J
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
eroot
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Dave
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Dave
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Dave
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
eroot
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Frank J
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Von R. Smith
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Diane L
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
CreateThis
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Diane L
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Mark Isaak
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
kveryeffective
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Mark Isaak
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Ernest Major
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Don Cates
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Desertphile
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
gesres
- Re: Semi OT: "He'll be OK",
Alexander
Op-Ed: Crackpot Christianity: Part Two,
Jason Spaceman
Op-Ed: Wrong lessons,
Jason Spaceman
In the News: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design,
Jason Spaceman
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kleuskes & Moos
Theistic evolution and Genesis - plants before light??,
chadmaester
Cornelius the Bollocks,
Tiktaalik
Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Cygnus X-1
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Frank J
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Desertphile
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Spanish Paranoia
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Cygnus X-1
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
John Harshman
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Cygnus X-1
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Alexander
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
John Harshman
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
CreateThis
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Spanish Paranoia
- Re: Hitler was an IDer? - THANK YOU, David Ford!,
Cygnus X-1
The reproductive strategy of the Ottoman Sultans,
dkomo
Opinion: America's Taliban strikes again,
catshark
Telling It Like It Isn't,
Mark Nutter
Harris shows her true stripes.,
Ken Shaw
Human chromosome number,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Human chromosome number,
Dark Paw
- Re: Human chromosome number,
r norman
- Re: Human chromosome number,
Frank J
- Re: Human chromosome number,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Human chromosome number,
John Wilkins
- Re: Human chromosome number,
eyelessgame
- Re: Human chromosome number,
John Wilkins
- Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
Mike McKeown
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
r norman
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
Diane L
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
Mike McKeown
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Human chromosome number,
John Wilkins
- Re: Human chromosome number,
r norman
- Re: Human chromosome number,
rev.goetz
- Re: Human chromosome number,
Ron O
are we born good or bad?,
wf3h
Re: Traipsing through a review,
lanruvi2
Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
lanruvi2
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Mark Iredell
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Mark Iredell
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Mark Iredell
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Marc
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Marc
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Mark Iredell
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
josephus
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
spintronic
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Kent
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
John Wilkins
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Kent
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
John Wilkins
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Kent
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
John Wilkins
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Kent
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
John Wilkins
- Re: Book reviews: Darwin and ID,
Kent
Google Groups Killfile Updated 08/26/2006,
Desertphile
Pluto as a Planet,
miedvied
Concentration is important for success,
NRI Events
Getting tired of being single?,
irresistibleangela2@xxxxxxxxx
Mallard Fillmore on ID,
davidewoon
In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
JH
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
CreateThis
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes ,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
J. J. Lodder
- Message not available
- Re: In the News: Cardin,
J. J. Lodder
- Message not available
- Re: In the News: Cardin,
Deadrat
- Message not available
- Re: In the News: Cardin,
Tiktaalik
- Re: In the News: Cardin,
VoiceOfReason
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
eyelessgame
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
Deadrat
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes,
AC
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn,
J. J. Lodder
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
Dr.GH
Re: In the News: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate,
Frank J
RenewAmerica: Deadly mix: Darwin and Hitler,
Jason Spaceman
Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Desertphile
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Desertphile
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
AC
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Dr.GH
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Stile4aly
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
snex
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
snex
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
John McKendry
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
DJT
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
cactus
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Darrell Stec
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Darrell Stec
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Rich Townsend
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
DJT
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
DJT
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
DJT
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
bullpup
- Re: Re: Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
DJT
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Stile4aly
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Stile4aly
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
mccoy
- Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
snex
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
RAM
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Dave
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Alan Morgan
- Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
snex
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Dave
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Wakboth
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
SeppoP
- Chez Watt was: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
CreateThis
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Darrell Stec
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Kent Hovind - Subornation of False Muster?,
Dean Chesterman
Re: Dwarf planets,
Rowan Malin
OT: Millions of trailers,
Robert Carnegie
Continents and Islands?,
rev.goetz
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
rev.goetz
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
dgenglish
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
William Morse
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Craig T
- Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
bullpup
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Windy
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Desertphile
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Larry Moran
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Walter Bushell
- no ugly biracial children (was Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Don Cates
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Continents and Islands?,
Iain
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Wendel Fendel
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
dgenglish
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Timberwoof
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Windy
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
r norman
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Desertphile
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Desertphile
- Message not available
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
bob young
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Harry K
- Message not available
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Continents and Islands?,
Diane L
Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
John Bode
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
CreateThis
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
CreateThis
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Glenn Shaw
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
wf3h
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
genewardsmith
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
bullpup
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
CreateThis
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
josephus
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
catshark
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
wf3h
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Dean Chesterman
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Frank J
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kermit
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Tiktaalik
Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Frank J
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
cactus
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
AC
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Windy
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Windy
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Desertphile
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Ann Coulter is stunned!,
Kleuskes & Moos
Message not available
Message not available
Waxman Inquires About Omission of Evolution,
Ferrous Patella
Cosmic rays done it!!!!!,
michael . palmer1
Rant: Darwin was a racist,
michael . palmer1
design inference fails!,
snex
- Message not available
- Message not available
Kennedy & Collins Reach Agreement,
catshark
Gitt on a Bus,
Elf M. Sternberg
the molecules-to-man theory,,
NILS BÖRJESSON
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Conspiracy of Doves
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
TomS
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Inez
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Ye Old One
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
John Bode
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Nashton
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
wf3h
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: the molecules-to-man theory,,
John Harshman
Guardian blog piece: Reason lost by AC Grayling,
Dunc Harris
Ohio: School board race evolves into debate over science,
Jason Spaceman
WERE IDEAS CREATED BY THE BIG BANG?,
ck19
WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
david ford
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Message not available
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
david ford
- Message not available
- Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Eric Gill
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kermit
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
eroot
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Columbine killer & Darwinist Eric Harris,
Martin Andersen
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Jason Spaceman
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Ron O
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Andrew Arensburger
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Desertphile
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
wf3h
Re: WingNutDaily: Rabbi defends show linking Darwin, Hitler,
Desertphile
"Homeopathy and astrology are scientific" correlates with creationism,
Kari Tikkanen
Author of "Why Darwin Matters" interviewed,
j
govt. won't pay for studying evolution in college,
wf3h
vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
amoritz
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
amoritz
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Diane L
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Ernest Major
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Ernest Major
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Wakboth
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
AC
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
wf3h
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
michael . palmer1
- Re: vatican probably did fire astronomer,
MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Marlene Winell, Author of Leaving the Fold, to Hold Retreat,
ladyhawk_lh
Looking for quote on the designer,
yapete
Random Problem,
Al
Re: Random Problem,
guscubed
Re: Random Problem,
John Harshman
Re: Random Problem,
Cheezits
Re: Random Problem,
Dale
Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
CreateThis
- Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Manny Feld
- Re: Random Problem,
Kermit
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
CreateThis
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
CreateThis
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Al
- Re: Random Problem,
Dick
Re: Random Problem,
Shane
Re: Random Problem,
Denis Loubet
Re: Random Problem,
TomS
Re: Random Problem,
damnfine
Re: Random Problem,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Random Problem,
markus
Darwin's Deadly Legacy,
Andrew Arensburger
Dead whales: telling tales?,
Zuca Treangeli
UK Creationism Redux,
Alexander
Piltdown Man Hoax was published in thousands of textbooks,
rev.goetz
Evolution removed from list of majors for federal student aid,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Cardinal Schonborn - again,
TomS
Coping with evolution,
deusmaozim
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Aaron
- Re: Coping with evolution,
SeppoP
- Re: Coping with evolution,
jrsp8s
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Coping with evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Coping with evolution,
SeppoP
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Iain
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Inez
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Nickhotep
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Dwib
- Re: Coping with evolution,
John Bode
- Re: Coping with evolution,
dkomo
- Re: Coping with evolution,
dgenglish
- Re: Coping with evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Coping with evolution,
David Canzi -- non-mailable
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Codebreaker
- Re: Coping with evolution,
TCE
- Re: Coping with evolution,
Marc
- Re: Coping with evolution,
J. J. Lodder
Pluto's a dwarf,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
TCE
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Brian Westley
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
TomS
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
coaster
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
rev.goetz
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Phillip Brown
- Message not available
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
rev.goetz
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
mvillanu
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Timberwoof
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Stuart
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Timberwoof
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Timberwoof
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Klaus
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
AC
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Timberwoof
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Dave
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bob Pease
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
John Wilkins
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bob Pease
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Dave
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Dave
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
elcidbivar
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Stuart
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
CreateThis
- Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Phillip Brown
Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
FiveLongYears
Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Bob Casanova
Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
dgenglish
Re: Pluto's a dwarf,
Iain
another amusing analogy,
TomS
Department of Education folly,
9fingers
OT: Online Alife simulations?,
Koppe
Questioning Darwin: Ten UW-affiliated scientists express skepticism of evolution,
Jason Spaceman
Scientific Definitions,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Harshman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Harshman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Harshman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Ymir
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Zachriel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Zachriel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
genewardsmith
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Ross Langerak
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Re: Scientific Definitions,
Jeff Rosenberg
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Zachriel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Harshman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Zachriel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
genewardsmith
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- [MODERATOR NOTE] ]Re: Scientific Definitions,
David Iain Greig
- Re: [MODERATOR NOTE] ]Re: Scientific Definitions,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [MODERATOR NOTE] ]Re: Scientific Definitions,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
genewardsmith
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
genewardsmith
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Bryan Heit
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kent
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Codebreaker
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Shane
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Kermit
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Codebreaker
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Codebreaker
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
SeppoP
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Codebreaker
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
r norman
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
kveryeffective
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
john . 19071969
- Re: Scientific Definitions,
alwaysaskingquestions
In the News: Professor leaves VCU after criticizing book,
Jason Spaceman
Cows have accents,
Iain
- Re: Cows have accents,
John Wilkins
- Re: Cows have accents,
Radix2
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Cows have accents,
Dogma Discharge
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Cows have accents,
Stile4aly
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
Desertphile
- Re: Cows have accents,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Cows have accents,
Desertphile
- Re: Cows have accents,
Stile4aly
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Cows have accents,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Cows have accents,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Cows have accents,
Desertphile
- Re: Cows have accents,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Cows have accents,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Cows have accents,
B Richardson
- Re: Cows have accents,
TomS
- Re: Cows have accents,
Fangren
- Re: Cows have accents,
Dick C
- Re: Cows have accents,
Aaron
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kermit
- Re: Cows have accents,
Stile4aly
- Re: Cows have accents,
Dick C
- Re: Cows have accents,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Cows have accents,
Kent
- Re: Cows have accents,
Koppe
- Re: Cows have accents,
Ian H Spedding
Re: Cows have accents,
Fistpout Trebuchet
Re: Cows have accents,
Gerry Murphy
Maybe there's an innocent explanation ...,
michael . palmer1
Sheer unadulterated bigotry,
Tiktaalik
Rock age question,
brian452
Response to OEC webpage (long),
Giant Sloth
CC202: Transitional fossils do not show direct ancestry.,
Mark Isaak
I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!have TWO WORD-DOCUMENT!that I!!!!!!!!!!!!!Would like to E-MAIL to YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Re: I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!have TWO WORD-DOCUMENT!that I!!!!!!!!!!!!!Would like to E-MAIL to YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Delaware Dave
(***ic title snipped),
Thurisaz the Einherjer
Re: I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!have TWO WORD-DOCUMENT!that I!!!!!!!!!!!!!Would,
SeppoP
Re: I!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!have TWO WORD-DOCUMENT!that I!!!!!!!!!!!!!Would like to E-MAIL to YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
michael . palmer1
Re: Lecture of the Week: Mac/Linux,
Perplexed in Peoria
"ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
APOCALYPSE
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Erik the Red
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
wade
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jenspolsen
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
wade
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Dick
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jrsp8s
- "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
snex
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
wade
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength,,
Josh Miles
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Richard Forrest
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jrsp8s
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Inez
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Mark Stahl
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Richard Forrest
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
jrsp8s
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Inez
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
CreateThis
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
APOCALYPSE
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Inez
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
T Pagano
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
Deadrat
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
Mark Stahl
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
Inez
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
T Pagano
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Ken Rode
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
wf3h
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Kermit
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Deadrat
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
John Wilkins
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Kermit
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Deadrat
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
CreateThis
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Deadrat
- Re: Pagano tries the tired ID herring, fails again.,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Inez
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Tracy P. Hamilton
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Inez
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Inez completely misses the point,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: NeoDarwinism says nothing about the first replicating molecule: a Weakness, not Strength, of Evolutionism,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
Frank J
- Re: "ID Says Nothing About the Designer": a Weakness, not Strength, of the Design Argument,
goodrich_ms@xxxxxxxxx
[OT] American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
mvillanu
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
mvillanu
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
mvillanu
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
mvillanu
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
AC
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
mvillanu
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Tiktaalik
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Windy
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Josh Hayes
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Stuart
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Tracy P. Hamilton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
rich hammett
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Desertphile
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Deadrat
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
AC
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: American Jewish Paranoia,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: [OT] American Jewish Paranoia,
Jeffrey Turner
OT astrology and new planets,
TomS
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
jcon
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Wendel Fendel
- OT astrology and new planets,
snex
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Desertphile
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Desertphile
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Ron O
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Timberwoof
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: OT astrology and new planets,
J. J. Lodder
Re: Macroevolution Mechanism Demonstrated,
Windy
Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Spanish Paranoia
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Sverker Johansson
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Nick Keighley
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Spanish Paranoia
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Kermit
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Spanish Paranoia
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
AC
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Klaus
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Noone Inparticular
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
Fangren
- Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon,
J. J. Lodder
David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Jason Spaceman
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Wendel Fendel
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
indriko
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
TomS
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
CreateThis
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Ferrous Patella
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Desertphile
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Cheezits
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Free Lunch
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
bentley
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
bentley
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Desertphile
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Matt Silberstein
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Larry Moran
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Dan Luke
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
DougC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Stile4aly
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Kent
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Stile4aly
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Stile4aly
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Stile4aly
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Stile4aly
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Tom McDonald
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Tom McDonald
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
snex
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
CreateThis
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
UC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Tom McDonald
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
DougC
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
VoiceOfReason
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
9fingers
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Bill Wayne
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
Dave Oldridge
- Re: David Klinghoffer: 'Darwin Would Put God Out of Business',
michael . palmer1
DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
ck19
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
ck19
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
prospero33
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
alextangent
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
alextangent
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
alextangent
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
alextangent
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Don Cates
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER?,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: DOES DARK MATTER MATTER TO DARK MATTER?,
ck19
WingNutDaily: ADL joins in criticism of evolution expose,
Jason Spaceman
Where evolution breaks down?,
Jama
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
bullpup
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
A. Carlson
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Dale
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
flonesaw
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Jenny6833A
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
Codebreaker
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Where evolution breaks down?,
TCE
POTM: The Expanding Earth and Mind and other paradox,
Shane
RNA abiogenesis question,
jjsavage
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Ye Old One
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Gary Bohn
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Dale
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
spintronic
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
jjsavage
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
spintronic
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
spintronic
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
spintronic
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
dgenglish
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
Larry Moran
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
wade
- Re: RNA abiogenesis question,
dgenglish
ADL, Collins reaction to TV show,
michael . palmer1
Evolutionary Biology and the Simultaneous Policy,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: fast, easy cash,
David Canzi -- non-mailable
Worldnutdaily, PZ Myers and the Darwin/Hitler Connection,
Googler
Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Dennis Arndt
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Tracy P. Hamilton
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Stuart
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
John Harshman
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
eyelessgame
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Inez
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
mel turner
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Nic
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Kent
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Stuart
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Ron O
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
Dick C
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
hersheyhv
- Re: Question on Falsification of Common Descent,
alextangent
EcoFeedback,
virtualadepts
OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Occidental
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Inez
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Bill Wayne
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Inez
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Wakboth
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
William Morse
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
MitchAlsup
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
raven1
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
skyeyes
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
eyelessgame
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Desertphile
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Dale
- Re: OT: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Controlling Overpopulation in the Democratic Party,
Perplexed in Peoria
News: Colossal Cosmic Collision Reveals Mysterious Dark Matter,
Ye Old One
Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Vend
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Kermit
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Exponent
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
coaster
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
r norman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
r norman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
William Morse
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
William Morse
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
William Morse
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
William Morse
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
r norman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
Nic
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
- Re: Sexual selection of disadvantageous traits,
John Harshman
Re: Never seen before? A system seen on Oprah, 3,000 a day!,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
Hobbits not a separate speciies after all,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
The biggest non sequitur in history,
Jo
Biological knowledge correlates acceptance of human evolution (my study),
Kari Tikkanen
In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
mcv
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Nashton
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Googler
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Ken Shaw
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Googler
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Ken Shaw
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Ken Shaw
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Ken Shaw
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Ernest Major
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Googler
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
Gordon Hill
- Re: In the News: Pope Replaces Intelligent Design Critic at Observatory,
AC
WingNutDaily: Darwin-Hitler connection sparks attacks,
Jason Spaceman
Regarding "Darwinism",
Fangren
Girls Gone Wild!,
Desertphile
Ping: Lenny Flank (OT herp care),
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Just another Hitler comparison,
michael . palmer1
Re: OT: Attacks on the warrantless wiretap ruling,
John Wilkins
In the News: Astronomers offer proof of 'dark matter',
Jason Spaceman
Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Frank J
- POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Nashton
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Bill Wayne
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Marc
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
bullpup
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
T Pagano
- Re: Pagano slides into the gutter with the liars, settles in to get comfortable.,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Ving skewers Pagano. Shishkabob, anyone? Can't wait for Nashton; POTM seconded!,
Mark Iredell
- Iredell finds Pagano Posts to be Gateway, Pagano Utterly Vacuous as Usual,
Tracy P. Hamilton
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
Deadrat
- How many fallacies can Pagano fit into a single paragraph?,
John Harshman
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Tony's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
Dean Chesterman
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
wf3h
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Frank J's FAITH blinds him from the plain unavoidable facts,
Frank J
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Tiktaalik
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
wf3h
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
bullpup
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
RAM
- Re: POTM nomination - Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Joshua Zelinsky
- Re: Evolution takes more faith than what?,
Robert Carnegie
Jack Kemp's 2 cents,
michael . palmer1
Re: Jack Kemp's 2 cents,
Scooter the Mighty
Re: Jack Kemp's 2 cents,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
OT: Olmert learns from Bush,
Perplexed in Peoria
When Did Mathmatics Come About,
curtjester
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Kermit
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
curtjester
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
michael . palmer1
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
curtjester
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Gene Ward Smith
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
CreateThis
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
DougC
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About [sic],
Marc
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Gordon Hill
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
dkomo
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
John Wilkins
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
John Wilkins
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
John Wilkins
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Marc
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Walter Bushell
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Michael Siemon
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Free Lunch
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
dkomo
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
John Wilkins
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
dkomo
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
dkomo
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Walter Bushell
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
John Wilkins
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Walter Bushell
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
john . 19071969
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
curtjester
- Re: When Did Mathmatics Come About,
Perplexed in Peoria
Ham denies education report,
michael . palmer1
Exodus Decoded,
Pastor Dave
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
r norman
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Klaus
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Nasht0n
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
John Wilkins
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
r norman
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Sam
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Quantum Leaper
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Desertphile
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
Ye Old One
- Re: Exodus Decoded,
indriko
Re: The Expanding Earth and Mind and other paradox,
Wakboth
quiz - taliban or talibangelical?,
GSP
Debunking Physics,
paradigm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Debunking Physics,
prospero33
- Re: Debunking Physics,
bullpup
- Re: Debunking Physics,
paradigm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Timberwoof
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Nashton
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Debunking Physics,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Debunking Physics,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunking Physics,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Debunking Physics,
MitchAlsup
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Stuart
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Ernest Major
- Re: Debunking Physics,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Debunking Physics,
bullpup
- Re: Debunking Physics,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Debunking Physics,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Debunking Physics,
paradigm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Timberwoof
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Nashton
- Re: Debunking Physics,
bullpup
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Debunking Physics,
CreateThis
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Re: Debunking Physics,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Rolf
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunking Physics,
Desertphile
- Re: Debunking Physics,
jcon
ReNew America: Evolution: The Thalidomide of social silver bullets,
Jason Spaceman
Relationship between politics and science 2,
Sean_MacCloud
Re: MODERATORS SHOULD HAVE THEIR OWN USENET GROUP,
Sean_MacCloud
New Group of Birds Disproves Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Cops for ID,
Jason Spaceman
Age dating question,
AllanL
FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
hbarwood
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
bullpup
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD Not gradualistic,
Greg S
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Desertphile
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Dave
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD! (***ic "!" overload snipped),
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Kermit
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Dave
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
prospero33
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
CreateThis
- Re: FOSSIL RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Not gradualistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
UC
Letter to the Editor: Darwinists are on a wild goo chase,
Jason Spaceman
Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
rlbaty@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Geoff
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Free Lunch
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
bullpup
- Re: Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Ye Old One
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Ron O
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
bullpup
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
B Richardson
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
bullpup
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Desertphile
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
Flakey714
- Re: Dr. Dino trial delay, send money now!,
AC
Our Heavenly Father on 9-17-05,
urelian
Jesus returns code 444, 666 the truth and facts >>>> Da Vinci code,
Horizon246
Hendren v. Campbell: New TalkOrigins Archive FAQ; New Wikipedia article,
Harlequin
OT: The System Administrator Song,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
News Media Already "Teaching the Controversy",
CreateThis
selecting for buffoonery,
Mark Iredell
anti-ID e-book available at Talk.Reason,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Nashton
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Shane
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Ernest Major
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
wf3h
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
eroot
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Nashton
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Wakboth
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Nashton
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Ye Old One
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Shane
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
SortingItOut
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Marc
- Re: Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Ye Old One
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
CreateThis
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
CreateThis
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
guscubed
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Iain
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Dick
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
SeppoP
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
dgenglish
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Dick
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Larry Moran
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Larry Moran
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
amoritz
- Re: Article: The Origin of Life,
Perplexed in Peoria
The occurrence of abnormally high gas and oil pressures!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Lucy,
pvrmyth
Creationist Claim,
Giant Sloth
- Re: Creationist Claim,
r norman
- Re: Creationist Claim,
CreateThis
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Greg S
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Ye Old One
- Re: Creationist Claim,
A.Carlson
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Giant Sloth
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Nashton
- Message not available
- Re: Creationist Claim,
Ron O
- Re: Creationist Claim,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12 pages of quotes from Hubert Yockey,
Dr.GH
Question regarding mutation under sexual reproduction,
AL
Maybe OT?: Viruses approved as food additive,
Andrew McClure
John Calvert: Instruction needs 'clear thinking,' not rhetoric,
Jason Spaceman
WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
michael . palmer1
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dan Clore
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
snex
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Josh Miles
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ernest Major
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dan Clore
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ernest Major
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ernest Major
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Googler
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Josh Miles
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Greg S
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Richard Smol
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
wf3h
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Inez
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Inez
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Free Lunch
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Walter Bushell
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Walter Bushell
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Inez
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
TCE
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Walter Bushell
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Free Lunch
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Shane
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Shane
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Alexander
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
wf3h
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Walter Bushell
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Augray
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Augray
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Diane L
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Nashton
- Re: Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Shane
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Tom McDonald
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Rich Townsend
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Shane
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Josh Miles
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
eroot
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
neutralino
- Re: Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Ye Old One
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Mike Painter
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
wf3h
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
CreateThis
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Will in New Haven
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
bullpup
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Will in New Haven
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
lhcarter@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
bullpup
- Re: WingNutDaily: Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies,
Geoff
BBC radio programme: information theory guy,
Robert Carnegie
Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Bob Pease
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Greg S
- Re: Fermi paradox,
CreateThis
- Re: Fermi paradox,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fermi paradox,
topmind
- Re: Fermi paradox,
bryce . topmind . jacobs
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Zachriel
- Re: Fermi paradox,
topmind
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Zachriel
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Ali Day
- Re: Fermi paradox,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Fermi paradox,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Inez
- Re: Fermi paradox,
dkomo
- Re: Fermi paradox,
dkomo
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
dkomo
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Zachriel
- Re: Fermi paradox,
spintronic
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Fermi paradox,
dkomo
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Timberwoof
- Re: Fermi paradox,
dkomo
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Zachriel
- Re: Fermi paradox,
mcv
- Re: Fermi paradox,
Richard Smol
schlafly's new essay on evolutioun,
wf3h
RandomMaterialsPlusRandomVariationsPlus RandomEnvironment=Random Net Outcome,
Al
Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Matt Silberstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
jrsp8s
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
jrsp8s
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
jrsp8s
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Shane
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
CreateThis
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Al
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
CreateThis
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Shane
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
UC
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Iain
- Re: Random Materials + Random Variations + Random Environment = Random Net Outcome,
Greg S
Paging McCoy! Triceratops bred in captivity!,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
OT: Answer to question frequently raised here...,
zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
CreateThis
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jrsp8s
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
dysfunction
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
mcv
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Occidental
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Occidental
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kermit
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kermit
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
June
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
RAM
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
June
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
June
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Scooter the Mighty
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
dgenglish
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Desertphile
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Ken Denny
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
CreateThis
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
CreateThis
- Message not available
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Message not available
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
John McKendry
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
guscubed
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
AC
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kermit
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Relationship between politics and science,
AC
- Message not available
- Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the Government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character.",
UC
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Nashton
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Nashton
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Free Lunch
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
wf3h
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
wf3h
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Augray
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Lee Jay
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
UC
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Aid from Washington, D.C., he wrote, only "encourages the expectation,
AC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Ken Shackleton
Message not availableRe: Relationship between politics and science,
Kermit
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Desertphile
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Ken Shackleton
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Robert Grumbine
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
RAM
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Walter Bushell
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
RAM
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Ken Shackleton
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Robert Grumbine
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
John Wilkins
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Robert Grumbine
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Walter Bushell
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Walter Bushell
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Matt Silberstein
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Walter Bushell
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Kermit
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
UC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
AC
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Desertphile
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
jcon
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
APOCALYPSE
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Scooter the Mighty
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Windy
Re: Relationship between politics and science,
Desertphile
Native American Peyote Totems,
CoreyWhite
The mathematics of Chez Watt,
SRNissen
Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
GSP
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
GSP
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Al
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Al
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Al
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Al
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Al
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Peter Barber
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Alexander
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Fundies try to close down museum exhibits,
Geoff
early precursors of IC,
TomS
Good news for America,
LSR
The reDiscovery Insitute,
catshark
For Review and Approval - New QMP Entry,
catshark
Re: In the News: Experts debunk evolution,
Robin Levett
Mark Isaak's book,
Jim Heckman
- Re: Mark Isaak's book,
Inez
- Re: Mark Isaak's book,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Mark Isaak's book,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Mark Isaak's book,
Alexander
- Re: Mark Isaak's book can help justify one's belief otherwise it would be an expensive paper weight.,
T Pagano
- Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
John Harshman
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
T Pagano
- Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
snex
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
Free Lunch
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
CreateThis
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
John Harshman
- Re: Pagano retreats stage left, clutching a teddy bear.,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: Pagano retreats stage left, clutching a teddy bear.,
AC
- Re: Pagano retreats stage left, clutching a teddy bear.,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
CreateThis
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Pagano's thread title changes become tedious,
John Harshman
- Re: Mark Isaak's book can help justify one's belief otherwise it would be an expensive paper weight.,
Robert Carnegie
- Tony's Jealous Again,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Tony's Jealous Again,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Tony's Jealous Again,
Alexander
- Re: VoiceOfReason gets something right but it ain't about jealousy,
T Pagano
- Re: VoiceOfReason gets something right but it ain't about jealousy,
Bill Wayne
- More weaseling by Pagano.,
Ken Shaw
- I don't usually pay attention to Pagano because, well, he's Pagano; but this is so out-of-touch-with-reality that I figured, what the hell?,
Tom McDonald
- Tony's Jealous Again,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: VoiceOfReason gets something right but it ain't about jealousy,
Jim Lovejoy
Mr. Green Jeans,
UC
Giants!,
rich hammett
Yet another proof of natural selection,
Tim
Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Dunc Harris
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
seemysig
- Re: Three essays on the origin of life,
borg31de777@xxxxxxxx
Re: Determinism,
Beautiful and Damned
Two articles in Bioscience,
Dunc Harris
Americans Want Two Theories in School,
Ferrous Patella
Hybrid Animals,
virtualadepts
News: New Source of Replacement Brain Cells Found,
Ye Old One
News: Australia formed by three continent collision: study,
Ye Old One
TomS,
an example of design
2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
boltzenator
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
TomS
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Richard Smol
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Nashton
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
CreateThis
- Re: Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
The Last Conformist
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Sam
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Sam
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kermit
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Pavil Natanovich
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Michael Siemon
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Michael Siemon
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Pavil Natanovich
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Michael Siemon
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Pavil Natanovich
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Pavil Natanovich
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Shane
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Shane
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Diane L
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Diane L
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Gordon Hill
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Shane
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Mark Isaak
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Gordon Hill
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Rowan Malin
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Walter Bushell
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Don Cates
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Wakboth
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Wikiality Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
roger_pearse
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
TCE
- 2 questions about Chez Watt,
Windy
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Mike Painter
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
wf3h
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
TomS
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
TomS
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
mcv
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
boltzenator
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
eyelessgame
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Dave Oldridge
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
UC
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Victor Eijkhout
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Chris Rohrer
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Perplexed in Peoria
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Gordon Hill
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
floyda
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
eyelessgame
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
jjurbanus
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Dick
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
Re: 2 questions about Inteligent Design vs Evolution,
Codebreaker
Editorial: Keep the Light On in Kansas,
Jason Spaceman
"Subornation of false muster": The case against "Dr. Dino" and Young Earth Creationism,
Jason Spaceman
Beavis's buddy stays busy,
michael . palmer1
Scientists may have found key gene,
michael . palmer1
[OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Noone Inparticular
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Alan Morgan
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Inez
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Occidental
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Inez
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Inez
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Inez
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Susan S
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Inez
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
William Morse
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Ernest Major
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Walter Bushell
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Walter Bushell
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Ken Denny
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Stuart
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
floyda
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Noone Inparticular
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
floyda
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Geoff
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
michael . palmer1
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Jim Willemin
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Nashton
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Bill Hudson
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
jrsp8s
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Message not available
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
jrsp8s
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
eroot
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
wf3h
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
David Iain Greig
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
William Morse
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
The Enigmatic One
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John McKendry
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Tom McDonald
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John Wilkins
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Walter Bushell
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John Wilkins
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Tom McDonald
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
William Morse
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John Wilkins
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John McKendry
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John McKendry
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John McKendry
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
John McKendry
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Deadrat
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
AC
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Walter Bushell
- Re: [OT]Why I love Pat Buchanan, rarely,
Susan S
pro-creators,
Faux_Pseudo
Re: Scientist and evangelical,
David Thuleen
Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Bill Wayne
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
FiveLongYears
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Pyong-Yang People's Daily Restaurant Reviewer
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Dick
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Ron O
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
TomS
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
wf3h
- Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Desertphile
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
rich hammett
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Ron O
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
wendel . fendel
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
panamfloyd
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
VoiceOfReason
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Gordon Hill
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Ye Old One
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Dave
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
CreateThis
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Diane L
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Dave Oldridge
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
ed
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
JohnN
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
wf3h
Re: Most Americans Want Two Theories Taught,
Desertphile
The Human Brain Wins The Genome Race (from Nature),
Marc
How did cold-blooded animals survive the KT event?,
casioculture
Re: Called brogers's bluff and as I suspected he folded.,
T Pagano
ORIGINATING A FUTILE THEORY,
Al
32 nations: science knowledge correlates with agreeing human evolution,
Kari Tikkanen
Re: 32 nations: science knowledge correlates with agreeing human evolution,
Desertphile
Gradual evolution from***to asex.,
Perplexed in Peoria
Brainless -- Human Events on Ann Coulter,
Chris Rohrer
rapid brain evolution to humans,
TomS
DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Inez
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Inez
- Re: DNA carries information,
George Evans
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Inez
- Re: DNA carries information,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: DNA carries information,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: DNA carries information,
Inez
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
eroot
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
hersheyhv
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Nasht0n
- Re: DNA carries information,
jrsp8s
- Re: DNA carries information,
Nashton
- Re: DNA carries information,
jrsp8s
- Re: DNA carries information,
Wakboth
- Re: Re: DNA carries information,
Ye Old One
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Nashton
- Re: DNA carries information,
B Richardson
- Re: Re: DNA carries information,
Ye Old One
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Augray
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Augray
- Re: DNA carries information,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
Denis Loubet
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Denis Loubet
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Denis Loubet
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Denis Loubet
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Denis Loubet
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Mark Stahl
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Shane
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: Re: DNA carries information,
Ye Old One
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: DNA carries information,
Susan S
- Re: DNA carries information,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
shipmodeler1
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Free Lunch
- Re: DNA carries information,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Kent
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
r norman
- Re: DNA carries information,
hersheyhv
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: DNA carries information,
Dick
- Re: DNA carries information,
Inez
- Re: DNA carries information,
hersheyhv
- Re: DNA carries information,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA carries information,
Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
In the news: Babyrousa babyrussa mates domisticated swine,
Carsten Troelsgaard
YEC meets the expanding earth,
Mark Isaak
Krause NY Times Op-ed Gross Exaggeration?,
Giant Sloth
space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dogma Discharge
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
MitchAlsup
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
wade
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
Dwib
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
r norman
- Re: space time,
AC
- Re: space time,
Dick
- Re: space time,
wendel.fendel
Weird World,
Dick
- Re: Weird World,
CreateThis
- Re: Weird World,
FiveLongYears
- Re: Weird World,
A.Carlson
- Re: Weird World,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Weird World,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Weird World,
Kent
- Re: Weird World,
John Bode
- Re: Weird World,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Weird World,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Weird World,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Weird World,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Weird World,
Desertphile
Terry Mortenson's e-mail and info on scriptural geologists,
Troy Britain
Kosmic Balance Presentation.,
Primal Point
Re: The Fallacy of Nonfunctional Intermediates,
Mark Fox
Talk about women and there issues?,
Jesus Helper
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Inez
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Diane L
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Nashton
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Diane L
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Wakboth
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Windy
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
CreateThis
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
mcv
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Inez
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Kermit
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
guscubed
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Diane L
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Desertphile
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Talk about women and there issues?,
Robert Grumbine
Catch the BBC's In Our Time podcast mp3s while they're still there,
casioculture
Arkansas candidate tells us the difference between ID and creationism,
Jason Spaceman
Re: Arkansas candidate tells us the difference between ID and creationism,
Phillip Brown
Re: Arkansas candidate tells us the difference between ID and creationism,
michael . palmer1
Re: Arkansas candidate tells us the difference between ID and creationism,
VoiceOfReason
Message not available
Re: Arkansas candidate tells us the difference between ID and creationism,
Robert Carnegie
HATE SPEECH,
ck19
Pre Big Bang/No "Code"- Can't Make Code.,
Al
Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Kevin Wayne Williams
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Dan Luke
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Mark Vaughan
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Nashton
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Free Lunch
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Marc
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Bill Wayne
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Tuokku
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Ferrous Patella
- Re:,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Don Cates
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Susan S
- Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Desertphile
- Winner - Re: Chez Watt Vote 15 AUG 06,
Harvest Dancer
Three easy(?) steps to get creationism accepted as science.,
Kent
test,
wendel.fendel
Visit Now www.sweetinbox.com/Special And Get Everything You Need On Internet.,
Allmasti
An atheist's defense of religion,
noctiluca
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Larry Moran
- An atheist's defense of religion,
snex
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- An atheist's defense of religion,
snex
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Kleuskes & Moos
- An atheist's defense of religion,
snex
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- An atheist's defense of religion,
snex
- Message not available
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Westprog
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Stile4aly
- Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Ben Standeven
POTM Nom: Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
VoiceOfReason
Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
john . 19071969
Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
Dave
Re: An atheist's defense of religion,
UC
Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
hbarwood
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Westprog
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Emma Pease
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
TCE
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
john . 19071969
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
TCE
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Bob D
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Tim Norfolk
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Bob D
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Stanley Friesen
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Larry Moran
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
alextangent
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Emma Pease
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Denis Loubet
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
TomS
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Sasha
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Nashton
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
LKU
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Augray
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Augray
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Nashton
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Augray
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Inez
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
SeppoP
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Larry Moran
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
SeppoP
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Augray
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Ye Old One
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
SeppoP
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Sasha
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Iain
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Nashton
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Craig T
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Annie . Orange
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
floyda
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Father Haskell
- Re: Disturbing event at my daughter's school,
Frank J
Re: Creation Science,
Andrew Arensburger
Re: Education, not ignorance,
johnreynolds2222
How Evolution Has Evolved - Niles Eldredge,
Jeffrey Turner
Ann Coulter, holocaust,
indriko
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
TomS
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
TomS
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
TomS
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
John Wilkins
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Windy
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Gray Shockley
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
hbarwood
- Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
TomS
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
TomS
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
A.Carlson
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
hbarwood
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
hbarwood
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
A.Carlson
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Free Lunch
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Message not available
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Message not available
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
floyda
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Free Lunch
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
hbarwood
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
CreateThis
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
david ford
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Dick C
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Inez
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
A.Carlson
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Mitchell Coffey
- Democrat fund-raisers: wasRe: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
RAM
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
UC
- Re: Real benefits? Was Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiktaalik
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Dan Clore
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiktaalik
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Shane
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Free Lunch
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Josh Miles
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Nashton
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ye Old One
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
WuzYoungOnceToo2
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Windy
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ye Old One
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Windy
- Re: Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
John Wilkins
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Josh Hayes
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
AC
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Augray
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
wf3h
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
wf3h
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Steven Sullivan
Message not available
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
A.Carlson
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Neil Harrington
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
bullpup
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Dave
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Walter Bushell
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Neil Harrington
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: Ann Coulter, holocaust,
Ron O
Message not available
Gravity vs Curved space-time,
Dick
Perhaps slightly off topic,
monkeys
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
DougC
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
A.Carlson
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
monkeys
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
A.Carlson
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
A.Carlson
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
fropome
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
fropome
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
skyeyes
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Kent
- Message not available
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Kent
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Ye Old One
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
floyda
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
John Wilkins
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
John Wilkins
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
floyda
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
John Wilkins
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
John Wilkins
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Windy
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Gordon Hill
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
mel turner
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Rolf
Re: Perhaps slightly off topic,
Desertphile
Origin of universe, religion versus science,
shanefield
HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Roland Anderson
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Wakboth
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Shane
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
CreateThis
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Inez
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Bob Pease
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
A.Carlson
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
UC
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Ross Langerak
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
Iain
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
John Harshman
- Re: HERE IS EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!,
eroot
how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
gm
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Shane
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Dave
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
wade
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
bullpup
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
TomS
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
CreateThis
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Cheezits
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Bob Pease
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Bob Pease
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Inez
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
TCE
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Mike Painter
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Desertphile
- Re: how are you supposed to debunk this mathematical nonsense,
Desertphile
Value of Cosmological constant is close to Hubble parameter squared!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Ron O
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Dick
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Bob Pease
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
moxmaniac
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
CreateThis
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
Ron O
- Re: Editorial: Teach Students To Ask Questions,
michael . palmer1
How to Make Sure Children Are Scientifically Illiterate,
michael . palmer1
Re: Lecture of the Week: Redesigning Life for Mars,
Perplexed in Peoria
[FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins,
David Iain Greig
A trivia question!,
casioculture
- Re: A trivia question!,
Bill Wayne
- Re: A trivia question!,
bullpup
- Re: A trivia question!,
Inez
- Re: A trivia question!,
Greg S
- Re: A trivia question!,
michael . palmer1
- Re: A trivia question!,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: A trivia question!,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: A trivia question!,
John Bode
- Re: A trivia question!,
Robin Levett
- Re: A trivia question!,
Desertphile
Britain: How did we get here?,
Jason Spaceman
Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
wuzyoungoncetoo
- Re: Curved space,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Curved space,
Sam
- Re: Curved space,
wendel . fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Curved space,
AC
- Re: Curved space,
Kent
- Re: Curved space,
Dick
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
DougC
- Re: Curved space,
r norman
- Re: Curved space,
DougC
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
CreateThis
- Re: Curved space,
DougC
- Re: Curved space,
r norman
- Re: Curved space,
DougC
- Re: Curved space,
John McKendry
- Re: Curved space,
John McKendry
- Re: Curved space,
r norman
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
TomS
- Re: Curved space,
DougC
- Re: Curved space,
TomS
- Re: Curved space,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Curved space,
CreateThis
- Re: Curved space,
CreateThis
- Re: Curved space,
CreateThis
- Re: Curved space,
wendel.fendel
No Big Bang, no Universal Laws, no Creation- What is it?,
ivars . fabriciuss
Schlafly polemic,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
jcon
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Dan Luke
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
rich hammett
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
catshark
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
catshark
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
rich hammett
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Dale
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Inez
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
CreateThis
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Desertphile
- Re: Schlafly polemic,
Frank J
What is an environmental catastrophe?,
rev.goetz
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Will in New Haven
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Cubist
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
r norman
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
rev.goetz
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robin Levett
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robin Levett
- Message not available
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
TomS
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robin Levett
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robin Levett
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robin Levett
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Grumbine
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
r norman
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Matt Silberstein
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
rev.goetz
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Will in New Haven
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Johnny Bravo
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
r norman
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Tiktaalik
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Matt Silberstein
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
eyelessgame
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Shane
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
Gordon Hill
Re: What is an environmental catastrophe?,
wendel . fendel
Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
mvillanu
- Re: Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Way off topic, OT .. mail to US from Greece,
Matt Silberstein
What makes us human?,
Jenny Brien
- Re: What makes us human?,
rev.goetz
- Re: What makes us human?,
r norman
- Re: What makes us human?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: What makes us human?,
r norman
- Re: What makes us human?,
Jenny Brien
- Re: What makes us human?,
William Morse
- Re: What makes us human?,
John Wilkins
- Chez Watt: Re: What makes us human?,
bullpup
- Re: Chez Watt: Re: What makes us human?,
Marc
- Re: Chez Watt: Re: What makes us human?,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: Chez Watt: Re: What makes us human?,
Ferrous Patella
- Re: What makes us human?,
William Morse
- Re: What makes us human?,
Nashton
- Re: What makes us human?,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: What makes us human?,
Dick
- Re: What makes us human?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: What makes us human?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: What makes us human?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: What makes us human?,
Dick
- Re: What makes us human?,
Rolf
- Re: What makes us human?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: What makes us human?,
r norman
- Re: What makes us human?,
wuzyoungoncetoo
- Re: What makes us human?,
Ron O
Conservative Christian Schools Quality,
Christopher Manteuffel
Re: Kent Hovind News: Lift restrictions, evangelist asks,
SeppoP
Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine,
SeppoP
Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue,
SeppoP
Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Aaron
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Aaron
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Nashton
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Nashton
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Shane
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Ye Old One
- Message not available
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Ye Old One
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Ye Old One
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Ye Old One
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Nashton
Message not available
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
Vend
- Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
Nashton
- Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Andrew McClure
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Nashton
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Shane
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Nashton
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kermit
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Shane
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kermit
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Message not available
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kermit
- Message not available
- Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Ye Old One
Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kermit
Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
Kermit
Re: Talk.Origins Poll: How do readers think...,
guscubed
Message not available
Message not available
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path,
dkomo
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
Kermit
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
Johnny Bravo
Re: Humans losing to nature in the speed of complexity growth- path to extinction?,
Desertphile
Re: Bias in science,
Robin Levett
In the News: Many Ark. candidates say intelligent design in schools is OK,
Jason Spaceman
Same ol' Arkansas,
michael . palmer1
Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
rev.goetz
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Josh
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Craig Franck
Message not available
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
michael . palmer1
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Nick Keighley
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
John Bode
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Zachriel
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Aaron
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Robert Grumbine
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
JohnN
Re: Astronomers struggle to define 'planet',
Harvest Dancer
OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Shane
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Tom McDonald
- Message not available
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John Wilkins
- Re: Mike Ag - The Death of Fe,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Mike Ag - The Death of Fe,
catshark
- Re: Mike Ag - The Death of Fe,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
alextangent
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Don Cates
- Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Shane
- Message not available
- Message not available
Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
alwaysaskingquestions
Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Dr.GH
Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Mitchell Coffey
Re: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Dale
Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Nashton
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
jcon
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Bill Wayne
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Nashton
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
RAM
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Shane
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Bill Wayne
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Bill Wayne
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Harlequin
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
jcon
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Kermit
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
CreateThis
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
bullpup
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Walter Bushell
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
bullpup
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John Wilkins
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John Wilkins
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Walter Bushell
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John Wilkins
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Tiktaalik
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Diane L
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Larry Moran
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Tiktaalik
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Diane L
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Shane
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Mark Isaak
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Walter Bushell
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
bullpup
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Ernest Major
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Tiktaalik
- Chez What:,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John Wilkins
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
Josh Hayes
- Re: OT: Mike Argento - The Death of Irony,
John McKendry
we're all descended from mohammed?,
wf3h
Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Paul Blake
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Greg S
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
wendel . fendel
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
William Morse
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
fropome
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Wendel Fendel
- Re: Time is what we measure with a clock.,
Dick
Re: THE EXISTENCE OF GOD AND HELL,
bullpup
Re: Proposed Article for the Quote Mine Project,
catshark
Re: Imagining the Tenth Dimension,
Rob
Gene Sequence Symbols,
The CDesign Proponentist
Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
mundanezen
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
- Message not available
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Richard Harter
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Robin Levett
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Bob Pease
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Robin Levett
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
wade
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Robin Levett
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Robin Levett
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Alan Morgan
- Message not available
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
r norman
- Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
John Wilkins
Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Friar Broccoli
Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
Re: Information as the carrier of efficiency,
Nic
Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Dunc Harris
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Windy
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Nic
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Ernest Major
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Windy
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Windy
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Ernest Major
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
David Holland
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Windy
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Harshman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
allanm
- Message not available
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Larry Moran
- Message not available
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Larry Moran
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Message not available
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Windy
- Message not available
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Larry Moran
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Nic
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Why sexual reproduction exists. (was: Cost of***- a bargain!),
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: Why sexual reproduction exists. (was: Cost of***- a bargain!),
r norman
Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Ben Standeven
Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Ernest Major
Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Inez
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Nic
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Inez
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Inez
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
r norman
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Inez
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Inez
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Tiny Bulcher
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Cost of***- a bargain!,
Perplexed in Peoria
Re: Holidays,
Inez
Re: This One Time, in Creation Camp...,
Bob Pease
EVIDENCE COVERED-UP BY THE GOVERNMENT INIDICATES THAT THE BIG BANG IS ACTUALLY THE SUPRISE INSIDE AN ENORMOUS BOX OF CRACKER JACKS,
ck19
Timothy Birdnow: Intelligent Design and Panspermia,
Jason Spaceman
Greece: Schools shun evolution,
Jason Spaceman
Jurassic Park; not the movie,
michael . palmer1
Booktv tonight,
Troy Britain
And Down Under ...,
michael . palmer1
Why is it macroevolution?,
Dunk
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Denis Loubet
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
topmind
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Nashton
- Re: Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Frank J
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
wf3h
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Frank J
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
rev.goetz
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
rev.goetz
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Nashton
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
TomS
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Nashton
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
TomS
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Shane
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
wf3h
- Re: Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Nashton
- Re: Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Frank J
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Larry Moran
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Dunk
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
r norman
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
MyUsefulAddress@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is it macroevolution?,
Dunk
Re: What are the most interesting or useful things you have learned from,
Dunk
Re: A Mathematical Proof,
Frank J
FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Qayam
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Inez
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Delaware Dave
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Kermit
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
VoiceOfReason
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
RAM
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Shane
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Gary Bohn
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
topmind
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Sam
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
David Iain Greig
Re: FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
JohnN
<Possible follow-ups>
FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!,
Qayam
[OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Rolf
- Re: My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Marc
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
John Wilkins
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Rolf
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
CreateThis
- Re: [OT] My new sig, with a bow to CreateThis.,
Ye Old One
Stalin was NOT a Darwinian,
wendel . fendel
Kansas Whinging (Part Deux) - The AiG Take,
Alexander
Kansas Whinging - the Agape take,
Alexander
In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
Jason Spaceman
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
VoiceOfReason
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
bullpup
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
TomS
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
mccoy
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
topmind
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
wf3h
Re: In the News: Evangelicals urge museum to hide man's ancestors,
Desertphile
I failed myself,
jjurbanus
ReNew America: Darwin's evolutionary disciples silent,
Jason Spaceman
Re: Creation Myths,
VoiceOfReason
Super Duper God-of-the-Gaps,
Zachriel
New Book 'Takes ID Seriously',
michael . palmer1
Rapid evolution evens the score,
michael . palmer1
Re: Why are Darwinists so SCEEEEEEEERED?,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
Re: new evidence for 3.8 billion year old life,
AC
Election loser flails about,
michael . palmer1
Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Free Lunch
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
MitchAlsup
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
John Wilkins
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Nic
- Cretinists silent when asked "2+2=?",
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Pastor Kutchie
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Inez
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
wf3h
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
wf3h
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Desertphile
- Re: Darwin's Evolutionary Disciples Silent,
Desertphile
Opt out?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Opt out?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Opt out?,
Bill Wayne
- Re: Opt out?,
Ken Shaw
- Re: Opt out?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Opt out?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Opt out?,
CreateThis
- Re: Opt out?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Opt out?,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: Opt out?,
A.Carlson
- Re: Opt out?,
wendel . fendel
Molecules of Emotions,
Dick
IMP,
Dick
DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
mcv
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Ken Denny
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
josephus
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
dtheobald
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
dtheobald
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Wilkins
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
dtheobald
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Kent
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Kent
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
dtheobald
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
John Harshman
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Don Cates
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Don Cates
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Giant Sloth
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Don Cates
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Don Cates
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
dtheobald
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
josephus
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Ye Old One
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Scooter the Mighty
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Alexander
- Re: DNA supports OEC?,
Desertphile
fossil-embryo story,
GSP
Science is nihilism,
michael . palmer1
Coulter's sourcing problems,
shepherdmoon
Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
michael . palmer1
- [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Inez
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Gary Bohn
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Alan Morgan
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
bullpup
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Robert Weldon
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Josh Hayes
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Shane
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Jim Willemin
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
A.Carlson
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Diane L
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
A.Carlson
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
bullpup
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Ken Rode
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
bullpup
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Roland Anderson
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Peter Barber
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Von R. Smith
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Kermit
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Diane L
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Nic
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
John Wilkins
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Shane
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Cheezits
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Shane
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Don Cates
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
catshark
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Desertphile
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Stile4aly
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Desertphile
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Desertphile
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: [MODERATOR POST] Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
MitchAlsup
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from,
dkomo
- Re: Try to calculate Your choroscope by substracting 6 years from Your birth ( e.g. 1957 instead of 1963). Just try once.,
Kermit
Re: Natural selection gave us souls,
Curt Welch
Australian creationist John Mackay on Canadian TV,
Jason Spaceman
In the News: 'Misinformation' Key to Kansas Conservatives' Ouster, Says ID Proponent,
Jason Spaceman
Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
designedevolution
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
dysfunction
- Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
snex
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
Timberwoof
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
CreateThis
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
wendel . fendel
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
Kermit
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
UC
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
dkomo
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
dkomo
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
raven1
- Re: Is symmetry a mere coincidence,
Greg S
Re: New medal,
AC
In the News: Pope to Dissect Evolution With Former Students,
Jason Spaceman
On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
John Wilkins
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Nashton
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Ye Old One
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
John Wilkins
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Nashton
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
John Wilkins
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Shane
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Shane
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
TomS
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
John Wilkins
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
CreateThis
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Kent
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Kent
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Desertphile
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Kent
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Desertphile
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Kent
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Kent
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
hawat . thufir
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
hawat . thufir
- Re: On the Nature of Science (and Religion),
Gordon Hill
Re: *** Post of the Month for June 2006: Vote Now! ***,
isatinov
Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Frank J
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- <Possible follow-ups>
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Westprog
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Walter Bushell
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Stile4aly
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Robert Carnegie
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
John McKendry
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
John Wilkins
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
John Wilkins
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
John Wilkins
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Message not available
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
TomS
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Zachriel
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Zachriel
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Zachriel
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Westprog
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Westprog
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Westprog
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- pinning the tail on the theist,
snex
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Westprog
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Shane
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
VoiceOfReason
Re: pinning the tail on the theist,
Ihab Hussein
New survey on opinions of evolution,
michael . palmer1
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Alexander
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Gary Bohn
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Larry Moran
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
David Iain Greig
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Larry Moran
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Fistpout Trebuchet
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Gary Bohn
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Gary Bohn
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Bill Wayne
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Alexander
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
goodrich_ms@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Gary Bohn
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Kari Tikkanen
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
DougC
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
Richard Forrest
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
UC
- Re: New survey on opinions of evolution,
michael . palmer1
God = Nature,
Sam
Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Sasha
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
lucaspa
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Inez
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
RAM
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
RAM
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
RAM
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Dick C
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Jon Fleming
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Jon Fleming
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Stuart
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Windy
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Windy
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
john . 19071969
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Dick C
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Diane L
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
TomS
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Frank J
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Frank J
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Kent
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Timberwoof
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Stuart
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
George Evans
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
John Wilkins
- Re: Creationism is a falsified scientific theory,
Draccus
epigenetics,
Dick
What is this process exactly?,
Dogma Discharge
Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Diane L
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Ken Denny
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
John Wilkins
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Ron O
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
John Wilkins
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Windy
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Ron O
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
John Wilkins
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Frank J
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Don Cates
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
John Wilkins
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
TomS
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
AC
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Peter Barber
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Stuart
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
JohnN
- Message not available
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Frank J
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Inez
- Re: Press Release: Noted Creationist to Address Wichita State University,
Desertphile
Commentary: Intelligent Design On Another Planet?,
Jason Spaceman
A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
MattDP
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Richard Forrest
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
MattDP
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Richard Forrest
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Gordon Hill
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Richard Forrest
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Alan Morgan
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
rappoccio@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
lucaspa
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
rappoccio@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
lucaspa
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
lucaspa
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
Kent
- Re: A Question of Faith: the Root of the Problem?,
CreateThis
Commentary: Political Science: McGavick Caters to Religious Conservatives, Backs Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Schools,
Jason Spaceman
OFF TOPIC,
ck19
New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
St Onan
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Timberwoof
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
bullpup
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Nashton
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
St Onan
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Augray
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Nashton
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Augray
- Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates),
Augray
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates),
TomS
- Re: Chez Watt?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates),
Shane
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive,
Nashton
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive,
Augray
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive,
Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Watt? (Was: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
lucaspa
- Re: New Creationist Claim: Possible to alter radioactive decay rates,
Cygnus X-1
New Wells book, FWIW,
michael . palmer1
Re: Science,
Shane
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Science,
Bill Wayne
- Re: Science,
Raimo Suonio
- Re: Science,
Frank J
- Re: Science,
Shane
- Re: Science,
John Wilkins
- Re: Science,
bullpup
- Chez Watt Re: Science,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Science,
bullpup
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Science,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Science,
bullpup
- TO: John Wilkins & bullpup,
Gordon Hill
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
bullpup
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
Free Lunch
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
bullpup
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
John Wilkins
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
John Wilkins
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
Gordon Hill
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: John Wilkins & bullpup,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Science,
Gordon Hill
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
wendel fendel
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
wendel.fendel
- Re: Science,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Science,
Desertphile
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
- Re: Science,
A.Carlson
Re: kent hovind arrested,
Robin Levett
"I gotta Degree!",
mccoy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Alexander
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
mccoy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
bullpup
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
mccoy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
bullpup
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
mccoy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
bullpup
- Re: Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ye Old One
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Alexander
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
A.Carlson
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Tom McDonald
- Re: Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ye Old One
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
mccoy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
A.Carlson
- Re: Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ye Old One
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
A.Carlson
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Klaus
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Wilkins
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Wilkins
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
DJT
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Augray
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Augray
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Desertphile
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ken Rode
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Inez
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Kermit
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
raven1
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Dana Tweedy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
hbarwood
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Robert Weldon
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
bullpup
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Ye Old One
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
raven1
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Wilkins
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Alexander
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Wilkins
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
JPG
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
mcv
- Message not available
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Wendel Fendel
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Gerry Murphy
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Desertphile
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
JPG
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Harshman
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Kermit
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
John Wilkins
- Chez What? Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Snidely F Whiplash
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Walter Bushell
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Desertphile
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Desertphile
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
raven1
- Re: "I gotta Degree!",
rev.goetz
Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Mark VandeWettering
Re: "I gotta Degree!",
VoiceOfReason
Re: "I gotta Degree!",
Desertphile
End of the world ?,
Logic Love
- Re: End of the world ?,
Craig T
- Re: End of the world ?,
bullpup
- Re: End of the world ?,
Pithecanthropus Erectus
- Re: End of the world ?,
John Wilkins
- Re: End of the world ?,
Harry K
- Re: End of the world ?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: End of the world ?,
slothrop
- Re: End of the world ?,
Don Cates
- Re: End of the world ?,
Gerard
- Re: End of the world ?,
Free Lunch
- Re: End of the world ?,
Shane
- Re: End of the world ?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: End of the world ?,
Don Cates
- Re: End of the world ?,
Andrew Arensburger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: End of the world ?,
Kermit
ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Inez
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Josh Miles
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Bill Wayne
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Bill Wayne
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Bill Wayne
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
SRNissen
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Bill Wayne
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Desertphile
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Inez
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Desertphile
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
JohnN
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
TomS
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
JohnN
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
JohnN
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Desertphile
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Richard Forrest
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
David Iain Greig
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
JohnN
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Al
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Kermit
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
bullpup
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Robert Weldon
- Re: ORIGIN FUNDAMENTALISTS AVOID VALID IDEAS,
Peter Barber
AAAS book on evolution and Christianity,
michael . palmer1
More musings from Babu,
michael . palmer1
What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Harshman
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Inez
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Harshman
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Inez
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Richard Forrest
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Dan Luke
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
OvC
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Wilkins
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
OvC
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Wilkins
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Wilkins
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Shane
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Dan Luke
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
OvC
- Message not available
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
John Harshman
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Bill Hudson
- Re: What Sean Pitman still says about the fossil record,
Frank J
Chandra confirms Hubble constant,
TomS
Re: Why total silence of islam ?,
Cheezits
Re: New hypothesis on orbital dynamics of Pluto,
TomS
Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Jeffrey Turner
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
mcv
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Westprog
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
John Wilkins
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
mcv
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
John Wilkins
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
John Wilkins
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
John Wilkins
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Wakboth
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Jenny Brien
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
SRNissen
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Richard Forrest
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Matt
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Dick C
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Shane
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Westprog
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
Dick C
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
TomS
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
michael . palmer1
- Re: Commentary: Tantalizing Evidence,
J. J. Lodder
WHO'S ON FIRST, WHAT'S ON SECOND. I DON'T KNOW IS ON THIRD,
ck19
Uncommon Conceit,
catshark
why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
samzen06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Radix2
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
bullpup
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Greg S
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Inez
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Ernest Major
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Inez
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Andrew Arensburger
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Marc
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
samzen06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Greg S
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gerry Murphy
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
DJT
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Gary Bohn
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Noelie S. Alito
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Kermit
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
VoiceOfReason
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Diane L
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Ye Old One
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Dwib
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
UC
- Re: why do scientists think that evolution is in their hands?,
Ken Shackleton