Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of molecular evolution?



Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of
molecular evolution?

Everything is standard science up till the discussion. Then I consider
the possibility of teleology.

The formating for some of the equations will not hold in a copy and
paste to the newsgroup. So if anybody is interested, I will have to
email the text in an rtf document.


James Goetz

.