Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
- From: John Harshman <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:11:41 GMT
rev.goetz wrote:
Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of
molecular evolution?
Everything is standard science up till the discussion. Then I consider
the possibility of teleology.
The formating for some of the equations will not hold in a copy and
paste to the newsgroup. So if anybody is interested, I will have to
email the text in an rtf document.
Post it with the equations removed, or reformatted, or merely described.
Generally a review article doesn't deal with equations, so I'm puzzled
as to what they might be.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: USA fascism video
- Next by Date: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
- Previous by thread: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of molecular evolution?
- Next by thread: Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
- Index(es):