Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- From: an588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Catherine Woodgold)
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:22:42 +0000 (GMT)
"Prof Weird" (poland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
hrvoje-d wrote:
For new ones to be created, mutations must
happen. In my program if you have two arrays (simplified): "1000101"
and "0001111" there is no way you can get 1100111" because there is no
"1" at the second place in this simple population of two individuals.
Of course I don't use such small populations. I use a population of
around 50-80.
But a mutation can PUT a '1' in the second location at any time; and a
population of 50-80 critters IS a rather small population; most genetic
algorithms use populations of several THOUSAND per run.
Wait a second ... so the program didn't allow mutations
such as a 0 changing to a 1? What sorts of mutations did
it allow?
.
- References:
- Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- From: hrvoje-d
- Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- From: UC
- Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- From: hrvoje-d
- Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- From: Prof Weird
- Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
- Next by Date: Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|