talk.origins

• Thread Index

---

• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• JustSayHi.com - Fun Online Dating. 100% Free
  • From: JustSayHi
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: John Burton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Algorithmic formulation of ID & intelligent networks (links)
  • From: nightlight
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Nashton
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Shane
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Shane
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dgenglish
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dgenglish
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Martin
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: UC
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Frank J
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue is old news
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: wf3h
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: AC
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: AC
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Frank J
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Q about FAQ
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Q about FAQ
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Flores 'Hobbits'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Shane
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Q about FAQ
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Shane
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: TomS
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Kermit
• Re: CHEZ WATT nomination Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: A question for Americans.
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• A question for Americans.
  • From: Mephistopheles
• CHEZ WATT nomination Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: theSalamander
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Looking for new friends
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Clash of Worldviews
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Shane
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: shinryuken88
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: TomS
• Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: snex
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Book of Joseph (1842)
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: TomS
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: Googler
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Color vision
  • From: TomS
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: TomS
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• CHEZ WATT Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Chez Watt: Re: Proposal New Newsgroup alt.intelligent-design
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: Sam
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Somatic mutations? (Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?)
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Bob D
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: jim62sch
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Color vision
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Dwib
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of molecular evolution?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The Book of Joseph (1842)
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Conspiracy of Doves
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Chez Watt was Re: Behe and IC
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: dysfunction
• Behe and IC
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Donalbain
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Thomas Paine an IDist?
  • From: Sam
• Looking for new friends
  • From: francis . amptmeijer
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Bob D
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: floyda
• Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: jcon
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: eroot
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Color vision
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: The Flores 'Hobbits'
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Googler
• Re: The Flores 'Hobbits'
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: Dick
• Re: Color vision
  • From: Dick
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Diane L
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: mcv
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: TomS
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: TomS
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Windy
• Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• The Flores 'Hobbits'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: John Taylor
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: Marc
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: topmind
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Satoichi
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Satoichi
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Shane
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: AC
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Clash of Worldviews
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception
  • From: monkeysuncle
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: catshark
• Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: apieceofstring
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: ID's Assault on Science
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Somatic mutations? (Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?)
  • From: Windy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Catherine Woodgold
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Catherine Woodgold
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Catherine Woodgold
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Robin Levett
• ID's Assault on Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Catherine Woodgold
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Catherine Woodgold
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Somatic mutations? (Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?)
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: apieceofstring
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: jim62sch
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: catshark
• Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: catshark
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: topmind
• Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Links to the Past
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: rem947
• Re: Color vision
  • From: josephus
• Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Links to the Past
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: jim62sch
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: It's a Miracle
• What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?
  • From: teavee
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: Windy
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: jimmenegay
• Clash of Worldviews
  • From: Iain
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: Windy
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Final word on the genome
  • From: Bob D
• Final word on the genome
  • From: Windy
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Emma Pease
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: floyda
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: odin
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: floyda
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: information
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: raven1
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: catshark
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Windy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: mel turner
• Somatic mutations? (Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?)
  • From: Windy
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Leonard Evens
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: ErikW
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Frank J
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: NPR Publishes Pro-ID Editorial
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: küpfer
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: TomS
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ron O
• Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: goodrich_ms@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: TomS
• Re: Need definition help
  • From: Ron O
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Need definition help
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: wf3h
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Ron O
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Logos: Portrait of a tear-jerker
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Two Who Changed Science
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Iain
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hovind & Chick
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Iain
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Marc
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Iain
• Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!
  • From: Iain
• Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Iain
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Shane
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Iain
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark'
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Hovind & Chick
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Peacenik
• Re: Response to "Fairy Tale" and "Liberal Ass-Hole. . . ."
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: z
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: username_not_found
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Harry K
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: catshark
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT
  • From: Ron O
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Two Who Changed Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: brogers
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Dick C
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: List of Needed FAQs in Talk.Origins
  • From: rossum
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Frank J
• List of Needed FAQs in Talk.Origins
  • From: JWIL
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Response to "Fairy Tale" and "Liberal Ass-Hole. . . ."
  • From: OpenMinded
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Frank J
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Three score years and ten ....
  • From: Inez
• Re: Sticker For Civics Books Proposed
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: odin
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Inez
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Three score years and ten ....
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Sticker For Civics Books Proposed
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: odin
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction
  • From: josephus
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Windy
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Windy
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Quick-Change Algae
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Beagle's Voyage in Fiction
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: This One Time, in Creation Camp...
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!
  • From: bullpup
• Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!
  • From: John Jones
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: This One Time, in Creation Camp...
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Ken Shaw
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: odin
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Sticker For Civics Books Proposed
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: odin
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Hovind & Chick
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: floyda
• Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: mel turner
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: floyda
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: floyda
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Hovind & Chick
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Craig Pennington
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: RAM
• Rev Hovind is funny!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: raven1
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: DougC
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Nic
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: catshark
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ck19
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: John Harshman
• This One Time, in Creation Camp...
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Harry K
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Him and Her
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Marc
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Frank J
• Him and Her
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Marc
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: catshark
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: NCSE on Kansas Election
  • From: Ron O
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: catshark
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Zeerok
• Hovind & Chick
  • From: Alexander
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: Science In The Bible
  • From: Shane
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Shane
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Shane
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Science In The Bible
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: John Hynes
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Nashton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Alexander
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again
  • From: Westprog
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Westprog
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ck19
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Ash
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ray
• Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ck19
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ray
• MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ck19
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Elmer
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: Elmer
• Re: I need help refuting this argument
  • From: jjm1954
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: michael . palmer1
• I need help refuting this argument
  • From: shinryuken88
• Re: Dinosaur Body Heat
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• [FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: D.I. In Denial
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Dale
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Frank J
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Ron O
• When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: snex
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: Frank J
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Klaus
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: D.I. In Denial
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: In the News: Evangelist arrested on federal charges
  • From: Frank J
• Re: In the News: Evangelist arrested on federal charges
  • From: Frank J
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Quick-Change Algae
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: D.I. In Denial
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: bullpup
• Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Kermit
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• When did creationists adopt adaptation?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Kim G. S. Řyhus
• Re: Quick-Change Algae
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Questions about a universal common ancestor
  • From: Joan
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: robin
• D.I. In Denial
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Dick
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: jcon
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Inez
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Inez
• Re: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: NCSE on Kansas Election
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Chez watt Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: jcon
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: jcon
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Iain
• Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Iain
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Inez
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Inez
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Inez
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: NCSE on Kansas Election
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?
  • From: nygdan_morteauxspam
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work!
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Jim
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Bob D
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: Inez
• Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: Robert Weldon
• NCSE on Kansas Election
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Al Gore vs. Evolution?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work!
  • From: Jim
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Inez
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: Inez
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Christopher Heiny
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05
  • From: ercaen
• Ratings of posts in this NG
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: TomS
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Kermit
• Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Kermit
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Mujin
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: TomS
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Andrew Arensburger
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Quick-Change Algae
  • From: Dick
• Re: What begat God
  • From: dkomo
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Christopher Heiny
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Mujin
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Cyde Weys
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Marc
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: UC
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Ilas
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: OT: Your Tax Dollars at Work!
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: TomS
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: TomS
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dick
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: astrochymist
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Dick
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: TomS
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: catshark
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• OT: Your Tax Dollars at Work!
  • From: catshark
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Ron O
• Re: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: nightlight
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: JPG
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: Radix2
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Larry Moran
• FREE "e-book" on DATING
  • From: Jennifersah
• Re: D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• D.I. Self-Promotion
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Donalbain
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Iain
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: READING THIS COULD ***!!!
  • From: lycquan
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Something I would like to see
  • From: Iain
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Bob D
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Shane
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: allanm
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: logos didn't win.
  • From: AC
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Susan S
• Re: USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• USA fascism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: AC
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: shipping companies
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: AC
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: AC
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: coaster
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Stile4aly
• OT: shipping companies
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Chez what Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: brogers
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: RAM
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: John Burton
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: apieceofstring
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Harry K
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: RAM
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: wf3h
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Stuart
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Quote Mine: Yockey
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: What begat God
  • From: WithGLEE
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: What begat God
  • From: WithGLEE
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: raven1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Pfusand
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Roger Coppock
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Nashton
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: Phillip Brown
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: raven1
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: bullpup
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: R Brown
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: John Thompson
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Dick
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: Shane
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Radix2
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Shane
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: RAM
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: wf3h
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Shane
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: wf3h
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: JWIL
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: kent hovind arrested
  • From: Jack
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Something I would like to see
  • From: Gebby69
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Something I would like to see
  • From: Ohsojourner
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• McCoy and Piltdown
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• kent hovind arrested
  • From: snex
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Chez Watt: 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: Windy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• 30 year mind meld between prof. Hall and his E. coli
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: RAM
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: EKurtz99
• Something I would like to see
  • From: Gebby69
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Dick
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Inez
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Get Fuzzy
  • From: Dick
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Nashton
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Dave
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Iain
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Inez
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Inez
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: ncrice
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Very, very old fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Joshua Aaron
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: coaster
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Whoops, nightlight resorts to special pleading!
  • From: Windy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Revisiting Galapagos Finches
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Googler
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: Whoops, anticipatory networks falsification falsified!
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Inez
• Re: DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Inez
• Role of 'Junk' DNA
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Inez
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Googler
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: UC
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Ohsojourner
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Very, very old fossils
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public
  • From: Phil Roberts
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Inez
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: heyref
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Thanks for exploring "The Origins of a Science"
  • From: Gordon Hill
• The scientifically ignorant mass public
  • From: Rubystars
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dick C
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Kermit
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: UC
• Re: Get Fuzzy
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: UC
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: JohnN
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Get Fuzzy
  • From: Kevin Wayne Williams
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Kermit
• Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: jcon
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Ringer
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: lt.kizhe
• DNA forms hologram?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Vend
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Westprog
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Ilas
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Windy
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: eroot
• Whoops, anticipatory networks falsified!
  • From: Windy
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Nashton
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Nashton
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: TomS
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: TomS
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Bob D
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Posting my thesis
  • From: Stephan Schulz
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: mcv
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Nashton
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Nashton
• John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: Nashton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: tim.anderson
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Quote Mine: Yockey
  • From: catshark
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Phil Roberts
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: Alan Kellogg
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Re: Gene function
  • From: Dr John Wilkins
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Basty Castellio
• Re: Americans United Files Public Records Request Regarding Ohio Science Standards
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Rolf
• Re: They don't care
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: brogers
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Josh Miles
• Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Americans United Files Public Records Request Regarding Ohio Science Standards
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Marc
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Marc
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Earle Jones
• Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Josh Miles
• Dinosaur Body Heat
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Marc
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dick C
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• CHEZ WATT Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Mike Ruskai
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Inez
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: God as collective consciousness
  • From: Inez
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Nic
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: raven1
• God as collective consciousness
  • From: Vend
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Inez
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: raven1
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Frank L
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Frank L
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: allanm
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: allanm
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Windy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Noone Inparticular
• Re: Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Martin Kess
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Shane
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Gebby69
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Teach Darwin Honestly
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Shane
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: logos didn't win.
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Logos
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Inez
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: coaster
• Chez Watt
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Jim
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: UC
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Larry Moran
• Darwin is a gateway science
  • From: Logos
• Re: I need help.
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Dick
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: UC
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Iain
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: jcon
• Evolution/Creationism Debate
  • From: robin
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: locke
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Iain
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Evolutionists' name-calling
  • From: robin
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Gold is a noxious gas!
  • From: UC
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: teavee
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dick
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: ncrice
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: teavee
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Inez
• Re: Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Inez
• Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: snex
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: UC
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Gebby69
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Stuart
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Steve Schaffner
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: mccoy
• The Great Evolutionist's Name-calling machine
  • From: mccoy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: anthonyberet
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Dinosaur Soft Tissue
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: logos didn't win.
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: floyda
• Re: I need help.
  • From: floyda
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: I need help.
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• I need help.
  • From: JamesGebhart
• Re: logos didn't win.
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Inez
• logos didn't win.
  • From: elcidbivar
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• early origins of bilaterality
  • From: TomS
• Re: Gene function
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Leonard Evens
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: UC
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Googler
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Googler
• Carnivorous kangaroos
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: What begat God
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Gene function
  • From: Dick
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: CreateThis
• Wistar conference math quote mining. QMP needs to cover this
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Kansas: Citizens for Science claim Intelligent Design running a smear campaign
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: What begat God
  • From: bob young
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Age of Earth, 1851 opinion
  • From: Murf
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Nashton
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Nashton
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: ErikW
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Evolution/Creationism Debates
  • From: Westprog
• After World Cup- "funniest creationist site" challenge
  • From: Murf
• Re: What begat God
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: z
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Iain
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Math In D.I. Land
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Shane
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Math In D.I. Land
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Kermit
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Kermit
• Dumbest quote mine ever...
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Windy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Quote Mine: Yockey
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Inez
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What begat God
  • From: dkomo
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Jim Spaza
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: LKU
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Nashton
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: guscubed
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Nic
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Kansas: Citizens for Science claim Intelligent Design running a smear campaign
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: Nic
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dick
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Nic
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dick
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Nic
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What's the Problem?
  • From: UC
• What's the Problem?
  • From: OpenMinded
• What's the Problem?
  • From: OpenMinded
• What's the Problem?
  • From: OpenMinded
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Joshua Aaron
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dave
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: dkomo
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Inez
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Kermit
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Inez
• Does someone here know what this psychological phenomenon is?
  • From: teavee
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: Jim
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Inez
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Re: They don't care
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Inez
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• White "pongo"; evidence of missing link fabricated
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: wade
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: Mahlon Wagner
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Kermit
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Tracy P. Hamilton
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Chris Manteuffel
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Chris Manteuffel
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Googler
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Alexander
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: coaster
• Re: Dr. Walt Brown and Uluru
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: What begat God
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Woland
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: Jim
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Jim
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: They don't care
  • From: UC
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: LKU
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Sam
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Dwib
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: jcon
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Stile4aly
• Logos Secret Identity? [WAS Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion]
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Jim
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What begat God
  • From: Dick
• Re: What begat God
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Westprog
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• What begat God
  • From: WithGLEE
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: wade
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Review: Crick Bio
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Googler
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: ed1ward2
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Dr. Walt Brown and Uluru
  • From: Shadowin
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Marc
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Jim
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Iain
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez watt Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: wade
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: JohnN
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Dick
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Jim
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Chez watt Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Shane
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Shane
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: TomS
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Marc
• Re: Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: David Ewan Kahana
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: TomS
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: TomS
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Nashton
• Re: They don't care
  • From: catshark
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: avital . pilpel
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Nashton
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ed
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: jack . mollier
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: jack . mollier
• Re: Is suffering selected against
  • From: FiveLongYears
• Re: American Heritage on Scopes Trial
  • From: catshark
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Stuart
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Midgets And Giants In The Deep Sea
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: ErikW
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Is suffering selected against
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Review: Crick Bio
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: floyda
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Adam Grinter
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: floyda
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Tony Raymonds
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Penn
• Ohio: State school board urged to add guide for hot-button discussions
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: thissteve
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Inez
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Marc
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: American Heritage on Scopes Trial
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Greg S
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Radix2
• Using an Onion to stop an abortion
  • From: Marc
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Tirade of the Month
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Bob
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The way it stands
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• The way it stands
  • From: Logos
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Inez
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Inez
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: eroot
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Inez
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Tirade of the Month
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: guscubed
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Dick C
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: John Burton
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Coulter creationism
  • From: bullpup
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Get loaded Paypal style
  • From: thissteve
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Coulter creationism
  • From: Marc
• Re: $10 FREE, traffic and hits
  • From: Marc
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Marc
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: wade
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Windy
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Shane
• Midgets And Giants In The Deep Sea
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Sam
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Coulter creationism
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Now: Gish lies, was: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: UC
• Re: $10 FREE, traffic and hits
  • From: UC
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Dale
• Re: They don't care
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: SMERFs responsible
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Marc
• Re: Coulter creationism
  • From: Marc
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• SMERFs responsible
  • From: Mark Nutter
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Shane
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Dave
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: bullpup
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: They don't care
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: wade
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• American Heritage on Scopes Trial
  • From: catshark
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: wade
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Evolution in the Light of Modern Knowledge
  • From: UC
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Jim
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Jim
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Coulter creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: Coulter and L. Ron Hubbard (Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Dr. Walt Brown and Uluru
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• The Church got some new "Scientific Stuff" for their library
  • From: Jim
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Kermit
• I admit I'm over my head on this one.
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Windy
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Coulter and L. Ron Hubbard (Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again)
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The Origins of a Science
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Get loaded Paypal style
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Sam
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Get loaded Paypal style
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Inez
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Dave
• Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: snex
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: wade
• Possibly original argument against evolution!
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Windy
• Re: Reconciling God and Science
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: wade
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: Dwib
• Re: They don't care
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Woland
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Chris H
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Windy
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Woland
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: CreateThis
• Reconciling God and Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: They don't care
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Dr. Walt Brown and Uluru
  • From: Shadowin
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Windy
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Inez
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Inez
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Kermit
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: Map projections
  • From: Brian Cryer
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Murf
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: My friend, the creationist
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• My friend, the creationist
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Ann Coulture hands are monkey feet
  • From: sng
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: TomS
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific
  • From: Leonard Evens
• Re: They don't care
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Iain
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: TomS
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Iain
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: UC
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Ray
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Windy
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: Marc
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: TomS
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: TomS
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: wade
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Ron O
• Re: POTM Nomination. Re: They don't care
  • From: Geoff
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Geoff
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: Nashton
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Westprog
• Re: They don't care
  • From: michael . palmer1
• POTM Nomination. Re: They don't care
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: Marc
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Shane
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: LSR
• Re: OT: Map projections
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Theocrats Mass Forces to Storm Nation's Courtrooms
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: They don't care - more proof that Logos is a troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Windy
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• OT: Map projections
  • From: mvillanu
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: coaster
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: coaster
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: brogers
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• THERE ARE HONEST AND DISHONEST TROLLS
  • From: ck19
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Peacenik
• Re: They don't care
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: floyda
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: floyda
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: They don't care
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: They don't care
  • From: eroot
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: They don't care
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Inez
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: floyda
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: They don't care
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Ron O
• Re: They don't care
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: They don't care
  • From: raven1
• Re: Quick-Change Algae
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: They don't care
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: They don't care
  • From: bullpup
• Re: They don't care
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: They don't care
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Peacenik
• Re: They don't care
  • From: floyda
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: They don't care
  • From: steven_pirie
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: floyda
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: floyda
• They don't care
  • From: Logos
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: nathan_baum
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Uncommon Descent, Panda's Thumb and Ohio
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Uncommon Descent, Panda's Thumb and Ohio
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: wade
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• A point lost to history, and found again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: guscubed
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Windy
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: floyda
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Marc
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Nic
• Op-Ed: Intelligent design not testable; it can't be a scientific theory
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: wade
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Quick-Change Algae
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Nic
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: wade
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Greg S
• The Origins of a Science
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: bullpup
• Get loaded Paypal style
  • From: payments
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Coulter again - comment with a more political slant
  • From: Shane
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Cabbage
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: Nic
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Chez Watt: Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: ranDoM ark
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Uncommon Descent Blog Policy
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: Nic
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Windy
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: Nic
• Political 'Science' in Ohio
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Intelligent design not testable
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Codebreaker
• Intelligent design not testable
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Nic
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Nic
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Alexander
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: AC
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: AC
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Coulter again - comment with a more political slant
  • From: codebreaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: ed1ward2
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: TomS
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: ed1ward2
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Frank J
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: UC
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: wade
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: test post, please ignore
  • From: wade
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Moment of Truth..
  • From: Inez
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: thissteve
• test post, please ignore
  • From: theSalamander
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Moment of Truth..
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Dan Luke
• Creationist logic
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: raven1
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Diane L
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: TomS
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: ranDoM ark
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: bdfasching
• Sean Pitman changes his web site, to no effect
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: wade
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Ron O
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Peacenik
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: TomS
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: TomS
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: eroot
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: TomS
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Nic
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Alexander
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Mark
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Allergies in modern urbanized people or a "In a healthy body a healthy spirit"
  • From: Mark
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Ash
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Transitional Fossils
  • From: Iain
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Transitional Fossils
  • From: Jama
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Coulter again - comment with a more political slant
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing Chez Watt?
  • From: Marc
• WingNutDaily Poll: Why do you think evolutionists are so unwilling to 'teach the controversy'?
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: John Wilkins
• Maybe I am an IDist after all,
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY OR TOMORROW OR WHENEVER YOU HAVE THE TIME ON YOUR HANDS TO DO SO AND OR SO ON
  • From: ck19
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: slothrop
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Shane
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: bullpup
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: tjake13
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: monkeysuncle
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• OT: David Ford loses a talking point
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: pzmyers
• The Irreconcilable Records: or, Genesis and Geology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Op-Ed: The real truth about morality
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: z
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: John Wilkins
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Nic
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Nic
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Nic
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Nic
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Kansas Links
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Recent Origins of Man, published 1875
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Westprog
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: bullpup
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Op-Ed: The real truth about morality
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Stuart
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Creation site compiling responses to talk origins
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Emma Pease
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: robin
• D.I. 'Significant Issues'
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Gerald Schroeder
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: A.Carlson
• John Wilkins
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Googler
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Togakure
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: catshark
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: johnreynolds2222
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: (OT) Ann Coulter plagerism video
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Coulter again - comment with a more political slant
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: (OT) Ann Coulter plagerism video
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Bob
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: wade
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: catshark
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Ash
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: TomS
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Discovery Institute to "Defend Science" in Kansas
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Alexander
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Frank J
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Frank J
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Gerald Schroeder
  • From: alwaysaskingquestions
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ivar Ylvisaker
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Nantko Schanssema
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ron O
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: Iain
• Chez WattI recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: Alexander
• News: Gene study shows***differences go deep.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Teaching Religion In Schools
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: new post submission
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ed
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: (OT) Ann Coulter plagerism video
  • From: JPG
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Susan S
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: AC
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• WingNutDaily: 'Outrageous misinformation' on Kansas standards
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: David Ewan Kahana
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Robin Levett
• Uncommon Descent, Panda's Thumb and Ohio
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Junius J. Thomas
• Re: Age of Earth, 1851 opinion
  • From: Westprog
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Windy
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Inez
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: TCE
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: TCE
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: TCE
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: michael . palmer1
• In the News: Group launches campaign for Kan. school science standards
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Stuart
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Kansas Links
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: bullpup
• Re: start making money fast
  • From: Marc
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: catshark
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Marc
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Discovery Institute to "Defend Science" in Kansas
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Marc
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Shane
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Shane
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Mark
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Kermit
• Coulter Syndicate to Probe Charges
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: The Last Conformist
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: skyeyes
• Re: Commentary on Coulter
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Frank J
• Commentary on Coulter
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Chez Watt Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: feedbackdroid
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Cabbage
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: mejercit
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: mejercit
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: wade
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: thissteve
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Inez
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Kermit
• It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: snex
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: jrsp8s
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Pavil Natanovich
• Re: D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• D.I. Decries Evil Darwinist Censors
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: wade
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: thissteve
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Multiple Postings
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: snex
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Age of Earth, 1952 opinion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: dkomo
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: David Wilson
• Audio: "The Case Against 'Intelligent Design'"
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Multiple Postings
  • From: Tiktaalik
• It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: snex
• Re: Evolution of regulatory sequences from transposable elements
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: snex
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Dave
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Kermit
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: jcon
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: dkomo
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• (OT) Ann Coulter plagerism video
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Kermit
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: wade
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: slothrop
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dkomo
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Discovery Institute to "Defend Science" in Kansas
  • From: Jim
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Jim
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Shane
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Kermit
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Bob Pease
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: TomS
• Evolution of regulatory sequences from transposable elements
  • From: Pie . Merchant
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Shane
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Windy
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: Nic
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Marc
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: John Wilkins
• Discovery Institute to "Defend Science" in Kansas
  • From: catshark
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Mark_Reichert
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: eroot
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cubist
• Re: Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Coulter and L. Ron Hubbard (Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again)
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Insects and the Evolution of Intelligence
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Nashton
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Nashton
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Cubist
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: catshark
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: bullpup
• Re: new post submission
  • From: Cubist
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Cubist
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Windy
• Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Junius J. Thomas
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• about asthma, evolution and sports
  • From: Mark
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: Vend
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ed
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ed
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Vend
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ilas
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Stephan Schulz
• Is this the place where people educated in genetics post?
  • From: Mark
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Insects: Evolution of Human Intelligence
  • From: Junius J. Thomas
• Re: Insects and the Evolution of Intelligence
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: indriko
• Re: ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: test
  • From: Marc
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: z
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Bob D
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Ping Don Findlay's strike game players
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Insects and the Evolution of Intelligence
  • From: Radix2
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: ck19
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cubist
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: SteveR
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: mel turner
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: bullpup
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: Hox genes in jawed vertebrates and insects
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: bullpup
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Hox genes in jawed vertebrates and insects
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Shane
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Shane
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: test
  • From: Shane
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Dale
• Re: Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: Nic
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Tom
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Dave
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Inez
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: classroom display
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Nic
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Desertphile
• The doom monkies
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Quote Mine: Maciej Giertych
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: The sea monkies
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Ash
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: catshark
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Ash
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Lee Jay
• The sea monkies
  • From: Logos
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: catshark
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Adam
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Ron O
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God [sic]?
  • From: Desertphile
• Fish evolution and diversity
  • From: Dale Husband
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Shane
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God [sic]?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• ID and "Fine Art"
  • From: catshark
• Fossils show how fish grew legs
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Kansas: Cultures clash in Democratic primary
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: classroom display
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: dysfunction
• Some Interesting questions on mutatio rates.
  • From: Gary Bohn
• Focus on the Family: I'm No Monkey's Brother
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: robin
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Frank J
• It's the origin of the *Universe* that should be argued about.
  • From: mike4ty4
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Radix2
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God [sic]?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ron O
• Re: classroom display
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ron O
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Windy
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Dave
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: bullpup
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Shane
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: bullpup
• D.I. Revisits Dover
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Quote Mine: Maciej Giertych
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: test
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: R Brown
• Re: Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: Inez
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: RAM
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Evidence for Big Leaps?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ash
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Iain
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God [sic]?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: AC
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God [sic]?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: classroom display
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Dave
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Bryan Heit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Dave
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Faux_Pseudo
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Iain
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: CreateThis
• Coulter and L. Ron Hubbard (Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again)
  • From: Mark_Reichert
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Iain
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Alexander
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: r norman
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Martin Hutton
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: jasongrehan
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Bob D
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: classroom display
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: küpfer
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: classroom display
  • From: r norman
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dkomo
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: pzmyers
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: classroom display
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Jim
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: r norman
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Jim
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Windy
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Iain
• Re: test
  • From: TomS
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Ron O
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: TomS
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: jasongrehan
• Re: About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Iain
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Windy
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: catshark
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ping Don Findlay's strike game players
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ping Don Findlay's strike game players
  • From: Odysseus
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: Marc
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: coaster
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: brogers
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: ck19
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Thought Provoker
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Shane
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: brogers
• Re: I recommend this analysis of Dembski's "No Free Lunch"
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Shane
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• online religion test - do you believe in God?
  • From: Adam
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Autonomous|Self
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Autonomous|Self
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Autonomous|Self
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Marc
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: RAM
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: Scooter the Mighty
• Re: classroom display
  • From: r norman
• About Nasht0n's teddy bear and evolution
  • From: Marc
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: wf3h
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: Inez
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Shane
• Re: Logos and patriotism
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: r norman
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: catshark
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Inez
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: r norman
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: coaster
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Ron O
• Logos and patriotism
  • From: robin
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Marc
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: guscubed
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Windy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Marc
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Inez
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: r norman
• Re: classroom display
  • From: r norman
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Inez
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Inez
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Windy
• Re: Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Shane
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• about gills, lungs scuba divers, and aualungs. Please do not laugh, this is from the newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Shane
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Shane
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: MitchAlsup
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: flabbergasted
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Mephistopheles
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Frank L
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Dunc Harris
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Wilkins and Others Get Recognition
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: catshark
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: UC
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: test
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Jim
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: My "Wombat Origins" Creationists church song
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Re: classroom display
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Adam's story
  • From: Iain
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Dave
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: catshark
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Inez
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Inez
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: classroom display
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: David Iain Greig
• {OT} USA Topographic Database free for download (Off-topic)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Adam's story
  • From: josephus
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Dave
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: AC
• Re: classroom display
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: AC
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: AC
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dave
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Jim
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Ben Standeven
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: coaster
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: AC
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Adam's story
  • From: Stephan Schulz
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: AC
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: AC
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: AC
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: AC
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: wade
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: TomS
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Jenny Brien
• Re: My "Wombat Origins" Creationists church song
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Kermit
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Murf
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: supernova remnants
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: UC
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: Marc
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: test
  • From: Marc
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: UC
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Richard Clayton
• My "Wombat Origins" Creationists church song
  • From: Murf
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: test
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: UC
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Wilkins
• supernova remnants
  • From: TomS
• Re: test
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: classroom display
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: How many times did the origin of flight converge?
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: UC
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Marc
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Craig T
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Marc
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: jasongrehan
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Marc
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Episcopal Church reaffirms evolution education
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Pithecanthropus Erectus
• Re: classroom display
  • From: ediebur
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: Nashton
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Augray
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Klaus
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Klaus
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Geoff
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Windy
• Re: IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Darwin and God: can they co-exist?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• IF YOU REALLY LOVE AMERICA, PROVE IT BY BURNING AN AMERICAN FLAG TODAY
  • From: ck19
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Shane
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: test
  • From: Marc
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Marc
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: pjbrown
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: jimmenegay
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Mike Ruskai
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: classroom display
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cubist
• Re: classroom display
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Inez
• Re: test
  • From: bullpup
• Re: classroom display
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Kermit
• test
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: wade
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Geoff
• Quote Mine: Edmund Leech in Nature
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: classroom display
  • From: bullpup
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dick C
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: AC
• Re: More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: "Chance" from Fred William's EvolutionFairyTale site?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: classroom display
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: classroom display
  • From: Inez
• Re: classroom display
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: classroom display
  • From: r norman
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Stanley Friesen
• classroom display
  • From: Logos
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Logos
• More Quote Mines Wald (again) and Prigogine
  • From: catshark
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Elf M. Sternberg
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Augray
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Augray
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quote Mine: Ruse claims evolution is a religion
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Radix2
• Re: NashtOn: An example of the usefulness of the TOE
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Hox genes in jawed vertebrates and insects
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Primes in DNA (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: catshark
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Quote Mine: Ruse claims evolution is a religion
  • From: catshark
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Hox genes in jawed vertebrates and insects
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Occidental
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Quote Mine: Ruse claims evolution is a religion
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: For Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: catshark
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Foe Review & Approval: Wald Quote Mine Reply
  • From: catshark
• Re: NashtOn: An example of the usefulness of the TOE
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Gulo Gulo
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• NashtOn: An example of the usefulness of the TOE
  • From: MWN
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Frank J
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Ash
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: coaster
• IDer Scours the Quote Mines
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: bullpup
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: coaster
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: bullpup
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: André G. Isaak
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Science Idol: the Scientific Integrity Editorial Cartoon Contest
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Congratulations! Straight like an arrow!
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: ediebur
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: RAM
• Re: Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Windy
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Nearly All Animal Phyla Present in the Cambrian
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: Tristan Miller
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: mlanesr
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: Wall Of Sleep
• Coulter exposes Darwinism
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Congratulations! Straight like an arrow!
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Ash
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Garry Denke
• Design and nested hierarchies
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: arachnophilia
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: "Chance" from Fred William's EvolutionFairyTale site?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: POTM nomination Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Gulo Gulo
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Logos
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: jack . mollier
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: ranDoM ark
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: June Chez Watt vote
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: John Harshman
• Origin of Religion (Refined)
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: POTM nomination Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: r norman
• Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Tom
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Happy 230th, USA!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: bullpup
• Re: POTM nomination Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• POTM nomination Re: Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Chez Watt?: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: jack . mollier
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re:
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Tony Raymonds
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Aforementioned paper: Evolution and Creationism.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Chez Watt?: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Windy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Chez Watt?: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Ethical dilemma here.
  • From: Sarah Waggoner
• Re: Chez Watt?: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Seeing God in science
  • From: Windy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Nashton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Chez Watt of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Windy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: mcv
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Geoff
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: wf3h
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Marc
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Marc
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Pip R. Lagenta
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: RAM
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: catshark
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: RAM
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Mark Stahl
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: guscubed
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Frank J
• Quote Mine: Yockey
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: arachnophilia
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Radix2
• Re: "Chance" from Fred William's EvolutionFairyTale site?
  • From: chance
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Quote Mine: C
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Marc
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Shane
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ron O
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: OvC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: mccoy
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• "Chance" from Fred William's EvolutionFairyTale site?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Quote Mine: C
  • From: catshark
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Genetic (?) Memory
  • From: Ex_OWM
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Results of the Great Evolutionist/ID Debate Thread
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Graham Douglas
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Gay from the Womb
  • From: Darkwing
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: r norman
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Quote Mine: C X-No-Archive: Yes
  • From: quid est veritas
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: Gman
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: The Knights who say "Ibid"
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: quid est veritas
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: quid est veritas
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: quid est veritas
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: quid est veritas
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: coaster
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Ash
• Re: US$2M dropped from EPA budget, closes libraries
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Ash
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: UC
• Re: Quote Mine: C
  • From: catshark
• Re: Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: Gman
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: Gman
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dwib
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Rational scientists? Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Is the complexity of evolutionary change explainable?
  • From: hrvoje-d
• recommendation letter for PhD admission
  • From: hesam . mhosseini
• Re: Rational scientists? Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Dave
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Ernest Major
• Ann Coulter caught plagiarizing--again
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: UK: Intelligent design creeps on to courses
  • From: AC
• Re: UK: Intelligent design creeps on to courses
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: hersheyhv
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Vend
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: jgrisham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• US$2M dropped from EPA budget, closes libraries
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Astronomy Kills People
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Gay from the Womb
  • From: AC
• Archimedes Plutonium & The Secret Of Kabbalah
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: POTM: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: silverstar69
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: DougC
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: UC
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Islander Racism
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: eroot
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Quote Mine: C
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Ken Denny
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: Marc
• Re: Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: UC
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: eroot
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Marc
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Results of the Great Evolutionist/ID Debate Thread
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Quote Mine: C
  • From: Harlequin
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Frank J
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Marc
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: bullpup
• Chez Watt?: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: Ron O
• Chez Watt?: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: bullpup
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: tim.anderson
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Astronomy Kills People
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Lee Bowman
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Johnny Bravo
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: Radix2
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Adam Grinter
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Marc
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Josh Hayes
• UFO's and Space Brothers
  • From: blacknblue
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Fish on a mountain top.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Chez Watt Vote 02JUL06
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: RAM
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: topmind
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: brogers
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: brogers
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: shepherdmoon
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: coaster
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: coaster
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Shane
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: André G. Isaak
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Jesus H Christ
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How many times did the origin of flight converge?
  • From: LKU
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Islander Racism (was: Cargo Cult Membership)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Phillip Brown
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Nashton
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: guscubed
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Marc
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Attack on Establishment Clause
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Vend
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Hypothesis under Review at PCID, AKA Creationist Online Journal:)
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Frank J
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Old Major
• Re: Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Imagining the Tenth Dimension
  • From: Rob
• Re: Results of the Great Evolutionist/ID Debate Thread
  • From: ave1
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Frank J
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Kermit
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Augray
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Mujin
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: catshark
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: catshark
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why We Have All The Nutters (was: The tyranny of science)
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: Logos
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: topmind
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Why We Have All The Nutters (was: The tyranny of science)
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Nearly All Animal Phyla Present in the Cambrian
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Evolution = Tolerance of Sin
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Definition of Hypothesis (was: Definition Challenge)
  • From: topmind
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Paul Smith
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: mel turner
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: TomS
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: bullpup
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: coaster
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Augray
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Astronomy Kills People
  • From: jcon
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Christopher Hitchens on religion
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Stuart
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: topmind
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Harry K
• Chez Watt was: Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: UC
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Bob D
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: man_in_black529
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: The tyranny of reality
  • From: Paul Smith
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Codebreaker
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Bob
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• The tyranny of reality
  • From: Augray
• Re: Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: catshark
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: The tyranny of science
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Augray
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Seeing God in science
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• The tyranny of science
  • From: Logos
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Chez Watt: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Gopherwood Range Theory
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nearly All Animal Phyla Present in the Cambrian
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: T
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Iain
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: TomS
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Alexander
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Inez
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Alexander
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Marc
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Ron O
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Dan Luke
• Are Aliens also a deliberate Hoax ?
  • From: Toadface
• Re: How many times did the origin of flight converge?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Ash
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: How many times did the origin of flight converge?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Alexander
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: Alexander
• Re: The unDarwin
  • From: Iain
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Seeing God in science
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ash
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ash
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Rolf
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Denis Loubet
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Moment of Truth.
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: OT almost
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: z
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: topmind
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: z
• Re: OT: Faux News Flap - Truth, Justice, and the Un-American Way?
  • From: arachnophilia
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: z
• Re: Is this totally weird?
  • From: Annie . Orange
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: z
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT almost
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Is this totally weird?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Delaware Dave
• Re: How many times did the origin of flight converge?
  • From: z
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Astronomy Kills People
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: June
• Re: Definition Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: z
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: topmind
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: Zachriel
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Cargo Cult Membership
  • From: bullpup
• Crown me! (and you, and you, and you...)
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 9
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: topmind spreads his seed
  • From: topmind
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Shane
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: bullpup
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: bullpup
• OT: Faux News Flap - Truth, Justice, and the Un-American Way?
  • From: Dale
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: bullpup
• Re: :Teach the Controversy' in Mo.
  • From: tc
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Inez
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Inez
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: nbenami
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: :Teach the Controversy' in Mo.
  • From: Quantum Leaper
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Ramdrake
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: ave1
• Re: The Expanding Earth and Mind and other paradox
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Von R. Smith
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Andrew McClure
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: neutralino
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Logos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: neutralino
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: neutralino
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: neutralino
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: David Fritzinger
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: jjm1954
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Ron O
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: UC
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: George Cleveland
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: UC
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils - NashtOff scores an own goal!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: michael . palmer1
• The unDarwin
  • From: robin
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Evolutioary biology - proven science.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: robin
• Re: O.T.- Rush Limpbaugh is in trouble again
  • From: robin
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Vend
• Stunning ID Breakthrough (Yawn)
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: topmind: ID is potentially testable
  • From: bryce . topmind . jacobs
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: robin
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Ken Rode
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: religious arrogance
  • From: robin
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Vend
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Logos
• Re: religious arrogance
  • From: robin
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: John McKendry
• Is Evolutionism American?
  • From: Logos
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: God: a failed hypothesis?
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: wf3h
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Deadrat
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Bob D
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Nickhotep
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: God: a failed hypothesis?
  • From: glennmorton
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Article: A very American crisis
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: TomS
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: WingNutDaily columnist: Darwinism's bitter fruits
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Astronomy Kills People
  • From: Dean Chesterman
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: TomS
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: TomS
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: pagano family worried - tony missing for 2 days
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Inez
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: TomS
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Semi OT: Growing Some Cojones on Stem Cells
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Augray
• Re: First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: r norman
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Ash
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Ash
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Remine & Haldane on sci.bio.evolution
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: catshark
• First Law of Intelligence and the Big Bang
  • From: Zoe
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Frank J
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Alexander
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: don
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Rob
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Josh Miles
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Christopher Hitchens on religion
  • From: Kevin Wayne Williams
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Ron O
• Semi OT: Growing Some Cojones on Stem Cells
  • From: catshark
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Rob
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: neutralino
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: eyelessgame
• Re: Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: my worldview
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: dkomo
• Re: Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: The Knights who say "Ibid"
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: don
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Rob
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Augray
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: OT: Duck!
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Mujin
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Rob
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Kermit
• Re: The unDarwin?
  • From: Inez
• OT: Duck!
  • From: Ian H Spedding
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: CreateThis
• The unDarwin?
  • From: Logos
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: André G. Isaak
• Re: OT: Little Rock, AK Loses Bearings And Wanders Into 21st Century
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Inez
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Carsten Troelsgaard
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Christopher Hitchens on religion
  • From: Robin Levett
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Tiktaalik
• Re: OT: Little Rock, AK Loses Bearings And Wanders Into 21st Century
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: pagano family worried - tony missing for 2 days
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: catshark
• Re: Here we go again
  • From: r norman
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Tuokku
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: OT almost
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Augray
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: eroot
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: catshark
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Tom
• Re: Christopher Hitchens on religion
  • From: Kevin Wayne Williams
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Human and chimp's "long goodbye" (again)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Article: A very American crisis
  • From: TomS
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Marc
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: rplasson
• Goldfish and nostrils.
  • From: Nashton
• Article: A very American crisis
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Evolutioary biology NOT a science.
  • From: Nashton
• Re: OT: Jury's Handle on the *** Pump Judge Case
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Ernest Major
• Cooperation only makes sense in evolutionary terms
  • From: Craig T
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: josephus
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: stew dean
• Re: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: Gman
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Gman
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: darwin's thought process
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Strange Coincidences
  • From: dysfunction
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Skitter_the_Cat
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Red Ape
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• [FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Ross Langerak
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: WingNutDaily: Team believes it found Noah's Ark
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Chez Watt: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: :Teach the Controversy' in Mo.
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: God: a failed hypothesis?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Chez Watt: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: catshark
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How many Arks did Noah Build?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: :Teach the Controversy' in Mo.
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Chez Watt: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: Ann Coulter's Intelligent Design
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: the perfect human eye
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: God: a failed hypothesis?
  • From: glennmorton
• Re: :Teach the Controversy' in Mo.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Desertphile
• OT: Little Rock, AK Loses Bearings And Wanders Into 21st Century
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: Larry Moran
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: More on Supernova Remnants
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: my worldview
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Nashton
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Lee Oswald Ving
• Re: And in Michigan
  • From: Frank J
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: OT almost
  • From: shipmodeler1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Does everything come from the Tenth Dimension?
  • From: Rob
• Re: Evolution Politics in Heartland
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Human and chimp's "long goodbye" (again)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: OT almost
  • From: Dick C
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• And in Michigan
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Strange Coincidences
  • From: dfnj2006
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Frank J
• Opinion: Addressing the public about science and religion
  • From: catshark
• Re: my worldview
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Don't Toast To This
  • From: rich hammett
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: CreateThis
• Re: my worldview
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Beneficial mutations (Was: Re: Challenge for Darwinists)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: my worldview
  • From: Frank J
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: wf3h
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Gordon Hill
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: bullpup
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• Re: Commentary: Ann Coulter's Intelligent Design
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Another one of Admiral Noah's Fleet?
  • From: bullpup
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: coaster
• Re: Origin of Religion
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Chez Watt: Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 3
  • From: Noelie S. Alito
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Nashton
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: r norman
• Re: South Carolina's Turn to Teach the Controvesy
  • From: Nashton
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: James Laurenson
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Frank L
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: D.I. Forges On
  • From: Inez
• Re: God: a failed hypothesis?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Peter Barber
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: lt.kizhe
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: jcon
• Evolution Politics in Heartland
  • From: michael . palmer1
• pagano family worried - tony missing for 2 days
  • From: snex
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: r norman
• Much Confusion in Bigfoot Science
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: George Evans, have you read this?
  • From: George Evans
• D.I. Forges On
  • From: michael . palmer1
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Inez
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Jim
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Googler
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Richard Forrest
• Re: religious fanaticism: USA versus Europe
  • From: Gerry Murphy
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Bill Wayne
• Re: OT: Why did the crawfish cross the road?
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: Inez
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: Logos
• Re: TO's real topic: Faith vs. Reason
  • From: Ferrous Patella
• Re: Survival of fittest theory and inventions, math of intelligent life
  • From: Sairiliyan Siyaska
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: wade
• Re: Second Annual Evolution Sunday -- 11 February 2007
  • From: catshark
• Re: Let's address Sean's falsehoods one at a time, shall we....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: hbarwood
• Re: Evolutionists follow the money
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Here we go again
  • From: Rolf