talk.origins

• Date Index

---

• JustSayHi.com - Fun Online Dating. 100% Free, JustSayHi
• Q about FAQ, Gerry Murphy
  • Re: Q about FAQ, John Harshman
  • Re: Q about FAQ, Dr.GH
• A question for Americans., Mephistopheles
  • Re: A question for Americans., jimmenegay
  • Re: A question for Americans., michael . palmer1
  • Re: A question for Americans., John Harshman
  • Re: A question for Americans., Inez
  • Re: A question for Americans., Kermit
    • Re: A question for Americans., Gerry Murphy
  • Re: A question for Americans., Gerry Murphy
    • Re: A question for Americans., CreateThis
      • Re: A question for Americans., Geoff
  • Re: A question for Americans., skyeyes
    • Re: A question for Americans., skyeyes
      • Re: A question for Americans., Martin
  • Re: A question for Americans., UC
  • Re: A question for Americans., Dan Luke
• Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Alexander
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, John Harshman
    • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Stile4aly
    • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, John Burton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, michael . palmer1
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, TomS
    • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, shinryuken88
      • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Tiny Bulcher
      • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Alexander
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Tiny Bulcher
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, lt.kizhe
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Ernest Major
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Richard Forrest
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, theSalamander
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, John Harshman
    • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, TomS
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Cubist
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Frank J
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting, Cyde Weys
• Re: Chez Watt: Re: Proposal New Newsgroup alt.intelligent-design, Elf M. Sternberg
• Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word review of molecular evolution?, rev.goetz
  • Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word, John Harshman
    • Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word, rev.goetz
      • Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word, John Harshman
      • Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word, rev.goetz
      • Re: Does anybody want to proofread and criticize a 7000 plus word, Stile4aly
• Re: The Book of Joseph (1842), Kermit
  • Re: The Book of Joseph (1842), Tiny Bulcher
• Behe and IC, Dick
  • Chez Watt was Re: Behe and IC, Stile4aly
  • Re: Behe and IC, Conspiracy of Doves
    • Re: Behe and IC, TomS
      • Re: Behe and IC, Gerry Murphy
      • Re: Behe and IC, Frank J
  • Re: Behe and IC, Kermit
  • Re: Behe and IC, Friar Broccoli
    • Re: Behe and IC, John Harshman
  • Re: Behe and IC, Frank J
  • Re: Behe and IC, Ernest Major
    • Re: Behe and IC, Frank J
      • Re: Behe and IC, Ernest Major
  • Re: Behe and IC, Mark Isaak
  • Re: Behe and IC, Matt Silberstein
  • Re: Behe and IC, Ron O
• Thomas Paine an IDist?, Sam
  • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, dysfunction
  • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, Geoff
  • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, Frank J
  • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, The Last Conformist
  • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, Sam
    • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, Googler
    • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thomas Paine an IDist?, dysfunction
• Looking for new friends, francis . amptmeijer
  • Re: Looking for new friends, michael . palmer1
• The Flores 'Hobbits', michael . palmer1
  • Re: The Flores 'Hobbits', Robert Carnegie
    • Re: The Flores 'Hobbits', Bill Hudson
      • Re: The Flores 'Hobbits', Robert Carnegie
• Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Cyde Weys
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John McKendry
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Deadrat
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Noelie S. Alito
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Mike Dworetsky
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Mike Dworetsky
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Windy
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Cyde Weys
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, alwaysaskingquestions
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, dysfunction
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, alwaysaskingquestions
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Mike Dworetsky
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Cyde Weys
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Dwib
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John Wilkins
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Ivar Ylvisaker
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Ivar Ylvisaker
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John Wilkins
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Larry Moran
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, jimmenegay
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John Harshman
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Cyde Weys
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John Harshman
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, John Harshman
      • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Geoff
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Codebreaker
  • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, Nashton
    • Re: Science is an all-or-nothing endeavor, CreateThis
• ID's Assault on Science, michael . palmer1
  • Re: ID's Assault on Science, Bobby D. Bryant
    • Re: ID's Assault on Science, Marc
    • Re: ID's Assault on Science, Geoff
  • Re: ID's Assault on Science, CreateThis
  • Re: ID's Assault on Science, Dick
    • Re: ID's Assault on Science, Richard Forrest
    • Re: ID's Assault on Science, CreateThis
• Re: Color vision, josephus
  • Re: Color vision, Dick
    • Re: Color vision, Martin Hutton
    • Re: Color vision, Ernest Major
    • Re: Color vision, TomS
• Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception, Ron O
    • Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception, monkeysuncle
  • Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent Deception, Dunc Harris
    • Re: Commentary: The Discovery Institute and the Theory of Intelligent, John Harshman
• Links to the Past, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Links to the Past, Dana Tweedy
• What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, teavee
  • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, Dunc Harris
  • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, jimmenegay
  • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, michael . palmer1
    • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, rev.goetz
      • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, michael . palmer1
      • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, Gerry Murphy
  • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, MitchAlsup
  • Re: What is the origin of "We praise your holy name ..."?, Kermit
• Clash of Worldviews, Iain
  • Re: Clash of Worldviews, Frank J
  • Re: Clash of Worldviews, David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Final word on the genome, Windy
  • Re: Final word on the genome, Bob D
    • Re: Final word on the genome, Windy
      • Re: Final word on the genome, jimmenegay
      • Re: Final word on the genome, Windy
      • Re: Final word on the genome, Timberwoof
      • Re: Final word on the genome, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Final word on the genome, David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?, Frank J
  • Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?, Stile4aly
    • Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?, Pip R. Lagenta
    • Re: Ark size according to Woodmorappe?, Bobby D. Bryant
• Re: NPR Publishes Pro-ID Editorial, Matt Silberstein
• Need definition help, Ramdrake
  • Re: Need definition help, Ron O
    • Re: Need definition help, Ramdrake
      • Re: Need definition help, Ron O
      • Re: Need definition help, Larry Moran
      • Re: Need definition help, John Harshman
  • Re: Need definition help, TomS
    • Re: Need definition help, Ramdrake
      • Re: Need definition help, TomS
      • Re: Need definition help, Ernest Major
      • Re: Need definition help, Cyde Weys
  • Re: Need definition help, Alexander
  • Re: Need definition help, John Harshman
    • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, jim62sch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, jim62sch
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, jim62sch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need definition help, Windy
      • Re: Need definition help, Larry Moran
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, Larry Moran
      • Re: Need definition help, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Need definition help, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: Need definition help, John Harshman
    • Re: Need definition help, Ramdrake
      • Re: Need definition help, CreateThis
      • Re: Need definition help, CreateThis
  • Re: Need definition help, Leonard Evens
  • Re: Need definition help, mel turner
  • Re: Need definition help, Richard Forrest
  • Re: Need definition help, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Need definition help, catshark
    • Re: Need definition help, Robert Carnegie
• Logos: Portrait of a tear-jerker, Joe Cummings
• WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', Jason Spaceman
  • Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', michael . palmer1
    • Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', Ron O
      • Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', John Vreeland
      • Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', Alexander
  • Re: WingNutDaily: Flood of claims for 'Noah's Ark', jcon
• Two Who Changed Science, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Two Who Changed Science, Ron O
• List of Needed FAQs in Talk.Origins, JWIL
  • Re: List of Needed FAQs in Talk.Origins, rossum
• Response to "Fairy Tale" and "Liberal Ass-Hole. . . .", OpenMinded
  • Re: Response to "Fairy Tale" and "Liberal Ass-Hole. . . .", michael . palmer1
• Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Inez
    • Re: Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Three score years and ten ...., michael . palmer1
    • Re: Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Kermit
    • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Cyde Weys
      • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Kermit
  • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Three score years and ten ...., Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Three score years and ten ...., MitchAlsup
    • Re: Three score years and ten ...., alwaysaskingquestions
• Beagle's Voyage in Fiction, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction, josephus
  • Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction, Desertphile
    • Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction, Dan Luke
      • Re: Beagle's Voyage in Fiction, Desertphile
• Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!, John Jones
  • Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!, bullpup
  • Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!, Iain
  • Re: Hawking and Dawkins! Lost in Space!, Iain
• Sticker For Civics Books Proposed, Will in New Haven
  • Re: Sticker For Civics Books Proposed, CreateThis
    • Re: Sticker For Civics Books Proposed, Will in New Haven
• Rev Hovind is funny!, Desertphile
  • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Ken Shaw
    • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Inez
      • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Ken Shaw
      • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, CreateThis
      • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, apieceofstring
    • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Jim Lovejoy
      • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Richard Clayton
  • Re: Rev Hovind is funny!, Inez
• This One Time, in Creation Camp..., Pithecanthropus Erectus
  • Re: This One Time, in Creation Camp..., Ken Shaw
  • Re: This One Time, in Creation Camp..., Ben Standeven
• Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Him and Her, Ernest Major
    • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, Windy
      • Re: Him and Her, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, mcv
      • Re: Him and Her, Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: Him and Her, Ernest Major
      • Re: Him and Her, Greg Guarino
      • Re: Him and Her, Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: Him and Her, Ben Standeven
      • Re: Him and Her, Windy
      • Re: Him and Her, Ben Standeven
      • Re: Him and Her, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, Windy
      • Re: Him and Her, Ernest Major
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, Tom McDonald
      • Message not available
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, mel turner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Message not available
      • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, eroot
  • Re: Him and Her, John Harshman
  • Re: Him and Her, Matt Silberstein
  • Re: Him and Her, mel turner
    • Re: Him and Her, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Him and Her, mel turner
  • Re: Him and Her, Inez
• Hovind & Chick, Alexander
  • Re: Hovind & Chick, Dana Tweedy
    • Re: Hovind & Chick, Ferrous Patella
      • Re: Hovind & Chick, Alexander
  • Re: Hovind & Chick, Bobby D. Bryant
• Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Science In The Bible, Shane
    • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Zeerok
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, odin
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Gregory A Greenman
    • Re: Science In The Bible, odin
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Klaus
      • Re: Science In The Bible, odin
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Emma Pease
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Science In The Bible, CreateThis
  • Re: Science In The Bible, Therion Ware
    • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Harry K
    • Re: Science In The Bible, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: Science In The Bible, Marc
    • Re: Science In The Bible, Craig Pennington
    • Re: Science In The Bible, Ben Standeven
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: Science In The Bible, DougC
    • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Mark VandeWettering
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Shane
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Shane
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Diane L
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Shane
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Shane
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: Science In The Bible, Ivar Ylvisaker
    • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, odin
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, odin
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Harry K
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, TomS
      • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Science In The Bible, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: Science In The Bible, Ivar Ylvisaker
    • Re: Science In The Bible, alwaysaskingquestions
• MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, ck19
  • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, ck19
    • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, Sairiliyan Siyaska
      • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, ck19
      • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, michael . palmer1
      • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, CreateThis
  • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, michael . palmer1
    • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, ck19
      • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, Frank J
    • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, It's a Miracle
  • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, Richard Clayton
  • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, Ben Standeven
    • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, bullpup
    • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, Satoichi
  • Re: MONEYISM : A BELIEF THAT MONEY CREATED THE UNIVERSE, topmind
• I need help refuting this argument, shinryuken88
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, jjm1954
    • Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument, Ye Old One
      • Re: I need help refuting this argument, B Richardson
      • Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument, Ye Old One
      • Re: Re: I need help refuting this argument, John Taylor
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Elmer
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, jimmenegay
    • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, michael . palmer1
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Ash
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, B Richardson
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Desertphile
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, floyda
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Von R. Smith
    • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Von R. Smith
  • Re: I need help refuting this argument, Inez
• Re: In the News: Evangelist arrested on federal charges, Frank J
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: In the News: Evangelist arrested on federal charges, Frank J
• When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Dick
    • When did creationists adopt adaptation?, snex
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Ernest Major
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, hersheyhv
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Dale
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, michael . palmer1
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Westprog
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, TomS
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Kermit
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Elmer
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Alexander
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Ron O
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Seanpit
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Nic
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Seanpit
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, hersheyhv
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Seanpit
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Frank J
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Von R. Smith
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Seanpit
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Von R. Smith
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Frank J
      • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Ron O
  • Message not available
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Gary Bohn
  • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, goodrich_ms@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: When did creationists adopt adaptation?, Ron O
• Questions about a universal common ancestor, Joan
  • Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor, Frank J
  • Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor, Ken Shackleton
    • Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor, Frank J
    • Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor, Ron O
  • Re: Questions about a universal common ancestor, mel turner
• D.I. In Denial, michael . palmer1
  • Re: D.I. In Denial, Desertphile
    • Re: D.I. In Denial, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: D.I. In Denial, Bobby D. Bryant
• D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again, michael . palmer1
  • Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again, Westprog
  • Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again, Desertphile
    • Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again, Westprog
      • Re: D.I. Misrepresents Vatican, Again, Ex_OWM
• Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, nygdan_morteauxspam
  • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ken Shackleton
    • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, John Bode
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ken Shackleton
    • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Frank J
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ken Shackleton
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ron O
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, floyda
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, floyda
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ron O
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, floyda
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Kermit
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Ken Shackleton
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, rem947
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, Nic
  • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, John Harshman
    • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, floyda
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, John Harshman
      • Re: Mitochondrial Eve a 'fact'?, floyda
• NCSE on Kansas Election, michael . palmer1
  • Re: NCSE on Kansas Election, MitchAlsup
    • Re: NCSE on Kansas Election, Quantum Leaper
  • Re: NCSE on Kansas Election, Ron O
• Al Gore vs. Evolution?, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Inez
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, jcon
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, bullpup
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Desertphile
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Dave
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, hbarwood
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, jcon
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, jcon
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, hbarwood
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, jcon
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Kermit
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Frank J
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, MitchAlsup
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, jcon
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Kleuskes & Moos
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, bullpup
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Kleuskes & Moos
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, bullpup
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Richard Clayton
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, bullpup
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Richard Clayton
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Richard Clayton
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Dick C
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Frank J
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Desertphile
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Richard Clayton
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Marc
    • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Desertphile
      • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Marc
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Timberwoof
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Mephistopheles
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Desertphile
  • Re: Al Gore vs. Evolution?, Peacenik
• St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, ercaen
  • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Robert Weldon
    • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Bob Pease
    • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Tiny Bulcher
  • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Kermit
  • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Desertphile
  • Re: St. Ignatius Loyola on 11-29-05, Earle Jones
• Ratings of posts in this NG, Sairiliyan Siyaska
  • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, Inez
  • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, Cyde Weys
    • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, rev.goetz
  • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, Ye Old One
  • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, AC
    • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, The Last Conformist
  • Re: Ratings of posts in this NG, Marc
• OT: Your Tax Dollars at Work!, catshark
  • Re: OT: Your Tax Dollars at Work!, Jim Willemin
  • Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work!, Jim
    • Re: Your Tax Dollars at Work!, Bob Pease
• FREE "e-book" on DATING, Jennifersah
  • Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING, Andrew Arensburger
    • Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING, Mujin
      • Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING, Kermit
  • Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING, Desertphile
    • Re: FREE "e-book" on DATING, Bill Wayne
• D.I. Self-Promotion, michael . palmer1
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Richard Forrest
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Andrew Arensburger
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Mike Dworetsky
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Ron O
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Richard Clayton
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT, Gerry Murphy
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT, Ron O
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion CHEZ WATT, Ferrous Patella
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Jim Lovejoy
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, catshark
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, TomS
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, hersheyhv
      • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Bobby D. Bryant
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Ilas
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Cheezits
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, shipmodeler1
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Andrew Arensburger
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Ron O
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Elf M. Sternberg
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, lt.kizhe
    • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, username_not_found
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Desertphile
  • Re: D.I. Self-Promotion, Frank J
• Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, lycquan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Inez
    • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Bob Pease
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Inez
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Bob Pease
  • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Desertphile
    • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Bill Wayne
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Desertphile
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, michael . palmer1
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Desertphile
      • Re: READING THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE!!!, Gerry Murphy
• USA fascism video, Desertphile
  • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
    • Re: USA fascism video, Bill Hudson
  • Re: USA fascism video, Inez
    • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Tiny Bulcher
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Tiny Bulcher
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Tiny Bulcher
      • Re: USA fascism video, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
      • Re: USA fascism video, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: USA fascism video, Tiny Bulcher
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, CreateThis
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
    • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
      • Re: USA fascism video, Tom McDonald
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
      • Re: USA fascism video, Inez
      • Re: USA fascism video, Kermit
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Inez
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Inez
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
      • Re: USA fascism video, Andrew Arensburger
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: USA fascism video, bullpup
      • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, bullpup
    • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Inez
      • Re: USA fascism video, Desertphile
    • Message not available
      • Re: USA fascism video, Andrew Arensburger
      • Re: USA fascism video, lt.kizhe
• OT: shipping companies, mvillanu
  • Re: OT: shipping companies, Radix2
    • Re: OT: shipping companies, mvillanu
      • Re: OT: shipping companies, Radix2
      • Re: OT: shipping companies, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: OT: shipping companies, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: OT: shipping companies, Inez
  • Re: OT: shipping companies, michael . palmer1
• Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Earle Jones
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Dunc Harris
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, alwaysaskingquestions
    • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Ramdrake
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Kleuskes & Moos
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, shipmodeler1
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Kleuskes & Moos
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Marc
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Elf M. Sternberg
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, lt.kizhe
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Frank J
    • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, alwaysaskingquestions
      • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Frank J
  • Re: Creationists: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!, Ron O
• kent hovind arrested, snex
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Jack
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
    • Re: Re: kent hovind arrested, Ye Old One
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, michael . palmer1
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, raven1
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Nashton
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, jrsp8s
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, raven1
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, mvillanu
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Shane
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, mvillanu
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, JPG
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Stuart
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
    • Chez what Re: kent hovind arrested, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, JWIL
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, R Brown
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Mark Nutter
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, shipmodeler1
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Harry K
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Earle Jones
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Klaus
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Earle Jones
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, wf3h
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Susan S
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Donalbain
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Harvest Dancer
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Mujin
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Ernest Major
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Ernest Major
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, astrochymist
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Dr.GH
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Radix2
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Roger Coppock
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, AC
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Jason Spaceman
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Dr.GH
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Cyde Weys
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, John Bode
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Dan Luke
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, bullpup
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Stuart
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, VoiceOfReason
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, John Burton
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Tuokku
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Joe Cummings
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Thurisaz the Einherjer
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Josh Hayes
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Matt Silberstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Matt Silberstein
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Jim
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Message not available
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Message not available
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Forrest
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, raven1
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Walter Bushell
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, raven1
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Noelie S. Alito
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Robin Levett
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Gerry Murphy
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Tiny Bulcher
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, John Wilkins
      • Re: kent hovind arrested, Shane
    • Re: kent hovind arrested, Richard Clayton
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Denis Loubet
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, Andrew Arensburger
  • Re: kent hovind arrested, VoiceOfReason
• Something I would like to see, Gebby69
  • Re: Something I would like to see, Ohsojourner
    • Re: Something I would like to see, Gebby69
  • Re: Something I would like to see, Iain
• Revisiting Galapagos Finches, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Brian Cryer
    • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, TomS
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Brian Cryer
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, TomS
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Bob Pease
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Brian Cryer
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, TomS
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Brian Cryer
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, bullpup
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Brian Cryer
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, bullpup
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, TomS
      • Re: Revisiting Galapagos Finches, Bob Pease
• Role of 'Junk' DNA, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Ken Denny
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Ken Shackleton
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, John Harshman
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Nashton
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Inez
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, CreateThis
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Nashton
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, bullpup
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, wf3h
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robin Levett
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robin Levett
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, John Harshman
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, z
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, John Harshman
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Larry Moran
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Inez
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Kleuskes & Moos
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Nashton
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Gerry Murphy
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Nashton
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Kermit
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Ernest Major
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, CreateThis
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, michael . palmer1
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, shipmodeler1
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Larry Moran
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, wf3h
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, apieceofstring
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Larry Moran
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, David Iain Greig
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Larry Moran
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robin Levett
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, David Iain Greig
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robin Levett
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, apieceofstring
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Denis Loubet
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
  • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
    • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, michael . palmer1
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, michael . palmer1
      • Re: Role of 'Junk' DNA, Dick
• Very, very old fossils, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Very, very old fossils, John Harshman
    • Re: Very, very old fossils, UC
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Stanley Friesen
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Richard Forrest
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, John Harshman
    • Re: Very, very old fossils, Robin Levett
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, John Harshman
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Robin Levett
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, John Harshman
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Robin Levett
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Stanley Friesen
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Robin Levett
      • Re: Very, very old fossils, Robert Weldon
• The scientifically ignorant mass public, Rubystars
  • Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public, Noone Inparticular
  • Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public, Phil Roberts
  • Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: The scientifically ignorant mass public, Alexander
• Get Fuzzy, Kevin Wayne Williams
  • Re: Get Fuzzy, zawadzki@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Get Fuzzy, Dick
• DNA forms hologram?, Dick
  • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Inez
    • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Bill Wayne
    • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Richard Forrest
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Richard Forrest
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Richard Forrest
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Richard Forrest
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
  • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
    • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Bob D
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
  • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Desertphile
    • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
  • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
    • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Bob D
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Bob D
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Wilkins
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Frank J
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Dick
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, John Harshman
      • Re: DNA forms hologram?, Ernest Major
• Re: Posting my thesis, Stephan Schulz
• John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Dan Luke
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, michael . palmer1
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Nashton
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, RAM
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Nashton
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Shane
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, RAM
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, wf3h
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, michael . palmer1
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, EKurtz99
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, RAM
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Bobby D. Bryant
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, RAM
      • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, CreateThis
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Gerry Murphy
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, CreateThis
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, Desertphile
    • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, TomS
  • Re: John Derbyshire: George Gilder, Metaphysic, silverstar69
• Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Nashton
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, bullpup
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, eroot
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Ilas
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Peter Barber
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, jrsp8s
      • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Bill Hudson
      • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Dan Luke
      • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, bullpup
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Mark VandeWettering
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, CreateThis
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Robert Weldon
    • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Tiktaalik
  • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Ohsojourner
  • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Googler
  • Re: Witless: Ann Coulter's Junk Science, Inez
• Americans United Files Public Records Request Regarding Ohio Science Standards, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Americans United Files Public Records Request Regarding Ohio Science Standards, Jason Spaceman
• Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Earle Jones
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, rev.goetz
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, SortingItOut
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, jimmenegay
    • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Ringer
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, jimmenegay
    • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, coaster
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, jimmenegay
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, John McKendry
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, CreateThis
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, coaster
    • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Pfusand
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Dick
    • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, mcv
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Googler
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Inez
  • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Roland Anderson
    • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Dick
      • Re: Should atheism be funded like "faith-based organizations" are?, Roland Anderson
• Dinosaur Body Heat, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Dinosaur Body Heat, Richard Clayton
• The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Radix2
  • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Nashton
    • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Windy
      • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Ernest Major
    • Re: Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Ye Old One
    • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, John Bode
      • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Ernest Major
    • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Radix2
  • Re: The Evolution of Haeckel's Embryos, Ye Old One
• God as collective consciousness, Vend
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Inez
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, rupert.morrish@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, dkomo
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Nick Keighley
    • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Nick Keighley
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Nick Keighley
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Nick Keighley
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Kermit
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Basty Castellio
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
    • Re: God as collective consciousness, Vend
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Earle Jones
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Kermit
    • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Kermit
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Dick
  • Re: God as collective consciousness, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: God as collective consciousness, Kermit
      • Re: God as collective consciousness, Puppet_Sock
• Teach Darwin Honestly, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Mark Nutter
    • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Ron O
  • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Noone Inparticular
    • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Chris Krolczyk
      • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Chris Krolczyk
    • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, michael . palmer1
  • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Inez
  • Re: Teach Darwin Honestly, Codebreaker
• Darwin is a gateway science, Logos
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Inez
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Dan Luke
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Tiny Bulcher
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, UC
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Jim
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Peter Barber
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Inez
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, allanm
      • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Desertphile
  • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Dana Tweedy
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Gerry Murphy
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, tim.anderson
    • Re: Darwin is a gateway science, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: Darwin is a gatew