Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: "chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx" <chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 11:27:00 -0700
mel turner wrote:
"wade" <wade.hines@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150825609.944704.185730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
r norman wrote:
On 20 Jun 2006 08:46:46 -0700, "wade" <wade.hines@xxxxxxx> wrote:
r norman wrote:
<pick a nit particularly bothersome to me>
Excretion is different from egestion. One produces urine, the other
feces which never were actually "inside".
<end pick>
Well we don't want you full of bile, do we? Or you might
get all cholicy.
I fail to see the humors in that remark.
Don't be hippocratical.
I try to be phlegmatic bout it, but these threads fill me with
melancholy.
cheers
Nothing would plasma more than an end to this cascade, but it just
keeps lymphing along.
Chris
.
- References:
- Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: Richard Harter
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: r norman
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: wade
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: r norman
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: wade
- Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- From: mel turner
- Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- Prev by Date: Re: Your name in lights
- Next by Date: Re: Your name in lights
- Previous by thread: Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- Next by thread: Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading