Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.


John Harshman wrote:
Richard Harter wrote:

[snip]

At least have the decency to change your name when you post these
things. You'd get a better haul if you did, too. I count three so far,

Then again, there is something to being able to walk into the flock
wearing ones natural wolf's clothing and shear a few sheep.

It would be like, say, if the former CEO of a large company were
to conduct a search for the best VP otUS candidate,
nominate himself, and steadily manufacture more and more
no bid business for his former ...,

Naw, that's too extreme.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet another reason why evolution cannot possibly be true.
    ... At least have the decency to change your name when you post these ... You'd get a better haul if you did, ... looks as if sponges are paraphyletic to the rest of Metazoa). ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
    ... in talk.origins, posted by John Harshman ... I'm saying that in the definitions I've been using, ... on what you perceive to be my inconsistency. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Harshman & Wilkins: the frauds of secular Fundamentalism
    ... John Harshman wrote: ... produce even one scholar or historian that denies immutability to have ... [snip remaining invective, which requires the false assumption that I ... false claims (which needless to say really are false claims, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: frankenstien chase scene
    ... <snip to> ... For those who do have the funds to haul ass, you have to travel at least a ...
    (rec.motorcycles.harley)
  • Re: Reproductive Selection
    ... John Harshman wrote: ... traits (or really the genomes) of two individuals, ... make it clear what your viewpoint is, and you have not done this. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading