Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- From: SRNissen <soren.nissen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:16:45 +0200
Shane wrote:
On 5 Jun 2006 14:49:54 -0700, Jim Spaza wrote:
AC wrote:On 30 May 2006 18:52:42 -0700,Do you not think that it is logically possible to use science to create
Jim Spaza <spaza9@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stile4aly wrote:Those people, for instance, which wish to push (or sneak) CreationismJim Spaza wrote:What kind of people in the United States are you talking about who wantAC wrote:Indeed, except the will of many within the US is to force religion onOn 18 May 2006 17:13:11 -0700,A secular state in that the government would be a direct reflection of
Jim Spaza <spaza9@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The U.S. was (is?) a Christian nation because of the makeup of itsMany of which are members of faiths that, in the Old World, had spent
citizens, not because any law declares it to be.
a good deal of time trying to kill each other off, which is precisely
why the Founding Fathers wanted to create a secular state.
the will of the people, not a tyrant that would force religion on its
subjects like England did.
the rest of us. That is where it becomes the government's
responsibility to become a-religious (not the same thing as atheistic).
to force their religion on others?
into public school science classes.
a theory that an intelligent being, whatever the form, interceded in
the formation of the universe?
What if the current science shows that it is mathematically improbable
that natural forces created this universe?
But it does not show that. Here is an experiment for you, take 10
decks of cards, leave in the two jokers for each deck giving you 540
cards. Shuffle all 10 decks together as often as you like. List the
cards in their final order. The probablity of that particular order
before you started shuffling was astronomical*, the probablitiy after
you finished shuffling, was 1. See how easy it is to acheive an
incredibly improbable result? Even the result of shuffling a single
deck of cards is far longer odds than most people will accept as
reasonable, yet every time a deck is shuffled, one of those highly
improbably events occurs. Go figure.
* from http://www.newdream.net/~sage/old/numbers/fact.htm
540! =
About 5.48*10e1254
Does anybody remember what odds it was Dembski claimed couldn't be beaten by chance?
- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- References:
- Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- From: Jim Spaza
- Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- From: Shane
- Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- Prev by Date: Re: What Came Before Monkies?
- Next by Date: Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- Previous by thread: Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- Next by thread: Re: News: Robertson (need I say more?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|