Re: Evolution Disproved once and for all

Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.

In article <1149405994.467650.269600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, coaster
wrote:
I see guiltless lies. Those who use the art of the con to profit at
the expense of people like you..
http://www.edconrad.com/

What makes you think Ed Conrad is a con artist? Everything I've read from
him seems to indicate that he's just a loon, and moreover that he probably
hasn't profited from said looniness.

Regards,
Tristan

When a scientist produces evidence it means they went out into the
field, recovered it and exhaustively researched it. If they're lucky,
they might sell their discovery to a museum, if their finding is
important enough.

When Ed Conrad produces evidence, it means he found an interesting
looking rock and then toiled away in his basement to produce a fake
artifact to convince the gullible. Then he sells his "discoveries" in
eBay.

ie. He's a con artist.

Clearly Conrad's con didn't work out as well as Hovind's has. Hovind's
con is more sophisticated. It doesn't make what he attempted to do any
less despicable.

.