Re: KT boundry event



John Harshman wrote:

UC wrote:
>
>> John Harman wrote:
>>
>>> UC wrote:
>>>
>>>>John Harman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>UC wrote:

[Snip a lot of stuff irrelevant to my question]

The Linnaean nomenclature exists strictly for classification; it has no
other purpose.
That's quite wrong, but it also seems irrelevant to any point you may be
making.
What other purpose does it serve, then, besides identification and
classification?
Hey, look, you already thought of another purpose. Good work.
I regard them as two sides of the same coin.

You regard wrong.


O R'lyeh?

Why would we classify anything but to identify it later? How can we identify what isn't classified?

While I disagree with the general thrust of UC's argument, I'll have to agree that any system of classification will, by its very nature, be usable as a system of identification, and vice versa.

- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... John Harshman wrote: ... [Snip a lot of stuff irrelevant to my question] ... What other purpose does it serve, then, besides identification and ... To classify a species is to determine its position in a Linnean ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: PCA
    ... variance in the data, which is X-axis in the graph below, for example ... (use the fixed courier font to see). ... purpose, the second PC is the better discriminator. ... selection may be inappropriate for classification. ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)
  • Classification or Pattern recognition?
    ... Are there any difference between Classification and Pattern recognition? ... I understand they are used for the same purpose but would say that Pattern ... Any other interpretations? ...
    (sci.image.processing)
  • Re: The Five Kingdom Classification
    ... John Harshman wrote: ... is that the man made "Five Kingdom Classification" of Life is wrong. ... When they have made sufficient process, unless ranks are ... more kingdoms that five. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The best examples of evolution have proven worthless
    ... John Harshman wrote: ... > Do you actually read any of the crap you cut and paste here? ... > purpose do you think is served by this other than to make yourself and ... seems to be only one of many that have fallen victim to mindless jargon ...
    (talk.origins)

Loading