Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: SRNissen <soren.nissen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:48:53 +0200
Josh Hayes wrote:
"SRNissen" <soren.nissen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1148590093.267054.102010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
SRNissen wrote:mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:Reply, JM. I cannot perform the experiment until you tell me how toOK. Here is the test. Some believe that life started via chance"Intelligence theory states that intelligence will create complex
processes. Others claim that amino acids came together through
some sort of predistination, meaning that because of inherant
properties of aminos they will naturally come together to create
life. But laboratory analysis has shown (observation) that this
does not occur and that in fact chance processes are at work. This
is much like tossing a magnet into a spinning dome and hoping
perchance that only blue rods within the dome will stick to the
magnet.
Therefore, the experiment is this: Intelligence theory states
that intelligence will create complex things, such as this
sentence. So the experiment for the everyone involved, will be to
close their eyes, spin around in the chair and without trying to
find your location on the keyboard, at random type letters. OK? I will try this now:
jihukh hkjhukjh luw3ouj jyucjcoljwnlj c jcluoiu cjououn kjoiu k
jloukcowu.
Now you try it and prove to me that there is any exception to the
law of intelligence. Can't do it? Of course if we figured in
thermodynamics some of the letters will disapear as soon as they
are formed, without cooling of course.
JM
things, such as this sentence."
How complex is that sentence? Is it more or less than this sentence:
"jihukh hkjhukjh luw3ouj jyucjcoljwnlj c jcluoiu cjououn kjoiu k
jloukcowu." ?
How do you know, what is the rule? That it's in english?
- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC
recognize a complex sentence.
I wouldn't hold my breath, Soren.
He's too busy begging the question to answer one. (that is, he wants to define "random" as "producing gibberish", so anyone who types something non-gibberish is not typing randomly, which proves random only produces gibberish. Boing!)
That's certainly the behavior I expect from mccoy in the future, yes, but I like to pretend that my opposition is reasonable. If I don't, my subconsciousness starts asking scary questions like "Is your time so unimportant that you can spend it debating known facts with the deliberately ignorant?" and I don't want to have to think about that.
Moreover, I should point out that I'm typing this in the dark and cannot in fact see my keyboard, and yet I'm still cruising along at about 75 words per minute. I guess that proves I'm an intelligence!
-JAH
Phew! I was so worried!
Personally, I have the sun in my eyes, but I know what you mean.
Allow me to just perform a quick experiment...
I'll type two letters in a row, randomly selected with closed eyes. Let's see how many of them become gibberish and how many of them contain complexity - however ill defined.
==
fl
fj
ty
dl
fl
fu
se
gi
==
fl - Abbriviation of florida. Clearly, complex information.
fj - gibberish
ty - old danish for "tend." "De tyer til at slås." "They tend to fight."
dl - Commonly used abbreviation of "download." Clearly a sign of complexity
fl - Huh, it appeared again. Like before, "florida." Incidentally, the fact that this appeared _twice_ actually indicates a _low_ Kolmogorov complexity factor.
fu - gibberish
se - Abbreviation of "Sweden." Also danish for "see." "Se! En hund!" = "See! A Dog!" The fact that it codes for 2 meanings indicates a very high level of complexity.
gi - short form of danish "give." Japanese martial arts clothing. Abbreviation of General Infantry. All in all, a very complex 2-letter word. Created completely at random, I might add.
- SRNissen
FABRICATE DIEM, PVNC
PS: Seriously Mccoy, unless you specify what "complexity" means, in this context, your experiment is wholly without merit.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: Josh Hayes
- Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- References:
- Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: mccoy
- Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: SRNissen
- Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: SRNissen
- Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- From: Josh Hayes
- Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- Prev by Date: Re: KT boundry event
- Next by Date: Chez Watt! Re: EVILUTION SUX
- Previous by thread: Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- Next by thread: Re: Test of the "Intelligence Theory"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|