Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- From: "Richard Forrest" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 May 2006 12:27:11 -0700
Wall Of Sleep wrote:
So now you've redefined random mutation to include normal variation. No
wonder the "T"oE can't be falsified.
No he hasn't.
Normal variation is the range of different alleles present in the gene
pool of a population.
The source of this normal variation is mutation, which we know (because
we have done rather a lot of scientific research on the subject) is
random in respect of fitness.
If there were no mutation there would be no variation in the gene pool,
and we would all be clones.
Get it now?
RF
--
"Are we to believe that mere chance can accomplish that which has proven
quite impossible for the enlightened scientist to achieve? I regard
that notion as absurd!" John A. Davison, Ph.D. - AN EVOLUTIONARY
MANIFESTO: A NEW HYPOTHESIS FOR ORGANIC CHANGE
"In nature invariably we find that no initial cause ever gives rise to
an effect greater than itself. Nature does not violate the principle of
causality, but the evolutionist delusion does, to no small degree."
Kazmer Ujvarosy - Brainstorms
"One thing for sure: at the heart of the physical universe, at the heart
of the whole shebang, are formulas, exact formulas." Doug Wedel -
Brainstorms
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- From: Wall Of Sleep
- Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- References:
- Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- From: Iain
- Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- From: Wall Of Sleep
- Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- Prev by Date: Re: Have The Happiest, Healthiest, And Most Well Behaved Boston Terrier
- Next by Date: Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge for Darwinists - Protein Synthesis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|