Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: "Robert Carnegie" <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 May 2006 13:20:21 -0700
John Wilkins wrote:
Gregory A Greenman wrote:
In article <e3mcsr$1a2l$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Wilkins
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> declared...
Gregory A Greenman wrote:
In article <1146910820.683509.97750It doesn't matter so long as the host species is numerous and able to replace
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, hugheaston01@xxxxxxxxxxx
<hugheaston01@xxxxxxxxxxx> declared...
Desertphile wrote:
1) Many organisms destroy their environments;Example please? AFAIK, most if not all cases of organisms damaging
2) Other organisms move into those destroyed environments and live
perfectly happy and healthy
their environments are foreign species introduced by humans. Hardly
relevant to the more general case of life throughout Earth's history.
How about a disease or parasite that kills its host?
the lost "resources" (from the pathogen's POV). Once host numbers get too low,
there is selection for less virulence. I doubt there have been many pathogens
that extinguish all their hosts.
It matters to the disease or parasite in that host. Their
relatives live on, but they die. Those particular germs,
bacteria, parasites or whatnot have destroyed their environment,
thus they are examples of #1 above.
You are equivocating between the type and the token. That *population* will go
extinct, but the species/strain won't.
Although some have - but I suppose that's typically when the population
is low anyway, due to other pressures, so really a virulent parasite
(say a virus) isn't the sole cause of extinction, just the straw that
breaks the camel's back.
.
- References:
- Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: hugheaston01
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: Desertphile
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: hugheaston01
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- From: John Wilkins
- Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- Prev by Date: Re: KT boundry event: why do bats have teeth if birds don't?
- Next by Date: Re: If you reject Darwin
- Previous by thread: Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- Next by thread: Re: Intriguing new concept regarding human origins
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|