Re: USA & Iran

wf3h wrote:


AC wrote:
On 3 May 2006 18:17:18 -0700,
wf3h <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snippage>


the US ignored the whole situation. again, you seem to think that's
wrong. why? why should we have NOT ignored hitler, but SHOULD have
ignored hussein? how do you know they 'dont represent a danger' until
they attack? do you WAIT until they DO attack? why?

The Allies were wrong. They needed to demilitarize Germany, and by the
1930s, all but abandoned it. If they had intervened at key moments, such
as forcing the disbandment of the General Staff, Germany's teeth would
have been pulled without a single shot.

why should the US have gotten involved? at the time the french army was
MUCH stronger than the german. they could have handled it in days.

Which is why AC is saying that the Allies were wrong.

this
reminds me of the massacres in kosovo. the EU and UN did nothing all
the while whining about the slaughter. FINALLY the US had to step in
and threatened to destroy the bosnian govt. only THEN did they stop.

but, i suppose, you were against that, too.


In which alternate universe did the above happen? It's not even wrong...

<snippage>

--
Robin Levett
rlevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (unmunge by removing big blue - don't yahoo)

.