Re: KT boundry event

NashtOn wrote:

uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I just finished Alvarez's book

"T. Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit misleading,
and Mr and Mrs Rex do not appear.

I am puzzled, however, by his poor argument that after the KT boundry
event the mammals were able to take over the niches (large animals)
that dinos had previously occupied. The question arises: Why didn't we
get dinos all over again? Why didn't we get large reptiles, at least?
Why large MAMMALS?



Do you think anybody knows the answer to this? Obviousy, according to
the ToE, it's probably because determinism goes out the window and the
conditions that made for the "evolution" of dinos were not present after
they became extinct.

Obviously? No. Nobody expects the same group to evolve twice -- look up
Dollo's Law. And dinosaurs, of course, didn't become extinct. There are
around 10,000 living species.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit misleading, ... that dinos had previously occupied. ... Why large MAMMALS? ... It would seem to me that if the planet was cleared of most species of ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit misleading, ... that dinos had previously occupied. ... Why large MAMMALS? ... And dinosaurs, of course, didn't become extinct. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... Gary Bohn wrote: ... Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit ... that dinos had previously occupied. ... Why large MAMMALS? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit ... that dinos had previously occupied. ... Why large MAMMALS? ... Then therapsids came back. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: KT boundry event
    ... Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit misleading, ... that dinos had previously occupied. ... Why large MAMMALS? ...
    (talk.origins)