Re: KT boundry event
- From: uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Apr 2006 13:46:02 -0700
Gary Bohn wrote:
uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:1145305916.209222.166940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
I just finished Alvarez's book
"T. Rex and the Crater of Doom" the title of which is a bit
misleading, and Mr and Mrs Rex do not appear.
I am puzzled, however, by his poor argument that after the KT boundry
event the mammals were able to take over the niches (large animals)
that dinos had previously occupied. The question arises: Why didn't we
get dinos all over again? Why didn't we get large reptiles, at least?
Why large MAMMALS?
Why *not* large mammals?
Not the question:
WHY large mammals and not large lizards, etc? Why not dinos all over
again? It had happpened before, many times!
--
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit a specific interpretation of the
bible.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KT boundry event
- From: shipmodeler1
- Re: KT boundry event
- From: John Harshman
- Re: KT boundry event
- From: Augray
- Re: KT boundry event
- References:
- KT boundry event
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: KT boundry event
- From: Gary Bohn
- KT boundry event
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is it that mainline Christians, Catholics in particular ( I am one) support God & Evolution
- Next by Date: Re: Defend Science!
- Previous by thread: Re: KT boundry event
- Next by thread: Re: KT boundry event
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
