Re: May be, both evolution and creationism are NOT exact terms?
- From: "Ken Shaw" <kshaw1967@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Apr 2006 11:14:15 -0700
borisg1@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The Real Bible Code really exists, No comments about the famous
versions.
The BOOK FORMAT, created by the AUTHOR is established.
The found out Facts have no any alternative explanation.
Every objective observers are invited to check up the validity of this
message.
The Event is coming - In real time!
Boris Goldinov
Decoding Diary: http://www.atoll-geocad.com/The-Message/Diary-ENG.html
For bull*** it is creative. It remains bull*** however.
Any sufficiently long manuscript will be found to have patterns. That
you found some in bound books versions of the Torah is of no
signifgance. Would the pattern exist if the printer had used a larger
font or a smaller page size?
Ken
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Chez Watt! (was: Re: Conceptually Evolution is NON-SENSE)
- Next by Date: Re: Conceptually Evolution is NON-SENSE
- Previous by thread: Re: May be, both evolution and creationism are NOT exact terms?
- Next by thread: Re: May be, both evolution and creationism are NOT exact terms?
- Index(es):