Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: John Burton <jrhoburton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:23:21 -0600
Grendel wrote:
"John Burton" <jrhoburton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2qadnSAQH5AAIqDZnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Grendel wrote:
[...]
If ET showed up here I would accept that evolution occurred because I[...]
believe God specially created this earth and only this earth with
intelligent life. And of course presumably an ET would have evidence of
other intelligent ET.
So then, evolution is your number 2 choice right behind the Bible, and
there are no others? You would just automatically assume that no other
*spiritualistic* paradigm were worth considering?
Like what?
John
Surely you are aware that there are religions, churches, spiritualistic
ways of thinking, *other than* yours (whatever yours might be)? I can't
imagine that *all* of just the "organized" ones claim that their
associated deity created intelligent life only on this earth. Even if
they did, anyone could start a belief-system which did not have that
tenet. (And, there must be many that simply do not address that subject
specifically.)
You prefer evolution to all of these?
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: Grendel
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- References:
- 2 questions for creationists
- From: snex
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: Grendel
- 2 questions for creationists
- From: snex
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: Grendel
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: John Burton
- Re: 2 questions for creationists
- From: Grendel
- 2 questions for creationists
- Prev by Date: Re: Another question for Creationists
- Next by Date: Re: McCoy's grasp of error analysis is totally absent.
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 questions for creationists
- Next by thread: Re: 2 questions for creationists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading