Re: Vocabulary Question
- From: Gary Bohn <garybohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
"The Cdesign Proponentist" <cdesign.proponentist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1144716095.178627.309830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Is there a word to describe the specific sort of evolution where no
branching has occurred? I'm having a difficult time explaining to
someone why H. erectus can be the ancestor of H. sapiens, with no
branching in between, and how the both can therefore be considered of
the same species in a sense, but that this in no way means that we are
the same.
Was there not branching? Both 'Homo sapiens sapiens' and 'Homo sapiens
neanderthalensis' claim 'Homo erectus' as an ancestor.
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
- References:
- Vocabulary Question
- From: The Cdesign Proponentist
- Vocabulary Question
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 good reasons not to take advise from Wilkins---Wilkins's Post-of-the-MonthNomination
- Next by Date: Re: What use is half an eye?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vocabulary Question
- Next by thread: What's wrong with this picture?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
