Re: Speculative Design Hypothesis (with predictions)


Wall Of Sleep wrote:

OK, maybe a better statement would be that an effect will not possess
more information than it's cause.
A simple algorithm contains all the information necessary to produce a
complex string, and the string can be traced directly back to the
algorithm that created it. The same can be said of a seed and a tree -
all the info necessary to make a tree is resident within the seed. No
outside information was generated that cannot be accounted for by the
simple algorithm or the seed.

evolution is an algorithm. it is a process no different than any other
process in nature. so you just allowed the camel to get his nose under
the tent.






4. All of life is related and shows evidence of common design.


All life is related....through common descent. If you are asserting
design....better provide some details about the designer, the design
process, and the construction techniques used to put the design into
practice.


Common *descent* is an assertion. The only part that's not asserted is
the "common" part. "Descent" has never been demonstrated as possible
via the mechanisms we are currently aware of, therefore common design is
a more reasonable assertion.

design is not a mechanism. you can make all the blueprints you want.
without the laws of nature they will never be expressed.

and we KNOW intelligence is ALWAYS connected to matter or energy. and
we KNOW intelligence is younger than the universe. so is your designer
made from matter and younger than the universe?



"In nature invariably we find that no initial cause ever gives rise to
an effect greater than itself. Nature does not violate the principle of
causality, but the evolutionist delusion does, to no small degree."
Kazmer Ujvarosy - Brainstorms


ujvarosy has never heard of gibbs free energy...so he's quite wrong.

.

Relevant Pages