Re: Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- From: "FiveLongYears" <fivelongyears@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2006 02:56:22 -0800
It was a major factor (lack of calcium) in why they were tall.
That line should have read " It was a major factor (lack of calcium) in
why they were so short"
Sorry. I saw it as soon as I "clicked" the post button...
FLY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- From: Johan
- Re: Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- From: FiveLongYears
- Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- Prev by Date: Re: Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- Next by Date: Re: Has talk.origins convinced any creationists?
- Previous by thread: Re: Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- Next by thread: Re: Human length and diet/medicine VS "evolution"
- Index(es):
