Re: Flank's Theory
- From: John Wilkins <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:29:50 +1000
Chris Nedin wrote:
T.o need a new postulate.
We have had the Salem Hypothesis (the conjecture that an education in
the engineering disciplines forms a predisposition to {SciCre}
viewpoints) for some time now, and it has served us well, but t.o need
to keep up with the times.
So I propose a new one, named after the first person I think
highlighted the observation in t.o (or maybe PT - actually I don't
care, as it's my postulate and so I get to name it). So t.o denizens, I
give you:
FLANK'S THEORY
"Those Creationists and IDers that most need to remain silent in order
to hide their true motives find it impossible to do so."
It also may be an alphabetic component:
Buckingham . . . Bonsell . . . Branning . . .
Behe . . .
Chris
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many say it was a mistake to come down from the trees, some say
the move out of the oceans was a bad idea. Me, I say the stiffening
of the notochord in the Cambrian was where it all went wrong.
It was all downhill from there.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Who are you going to believe? Me, or your own eyes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flank's Theory
- From: Cyde Weys
- Re: Flank's Theory
- References:
- Flank's Theory
- From: Chris Nedin
- Flank's Theory
- Prev by Date: Re: An old Usenet classic: "The Case of the State of Idaho" (or howanti-evolutionistsform their arguments)
- Next by Date: Re: OK - own up, who's the theatrical howler.. (or - I know wherenameless found his orange textbook)
- Previous by thread: Flank's Theory
- Next by thread: Re: Flank's Theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
