Re: Final judgement

nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

According to creationists, in the beginning there was the creation, and
at the end there will be the final judgement.

So far, so good.

Darwinists say you don't need knowledge about choice, it is all just
forces and process.



You don't need to know about that decision where
things originated, neither about that decision where things will end.
Or either they might say; oh maybe there are some choices in the
universe, maybe the universe could have turned out another way, but
such is not science.

Then they might look at you as a subject of study, and not see your
choices, look right through you, and only see your blood. Then they
might perform some experiment on you, like put chemicals in your blood,
drugs or alcohol. And when you behave differently under the influence
of the chemicals then they suppose to know that your choices aren't
actually real, that your behaviour was just a complex matter of
chemicals in cause and effect, not choices.

Of the thousands of Darwinist scientists, I can't point to any single
one who prizes knowledge about choices highly. On the other hand I can
be confident that every single last Creation scientist, without any
exception, treasures knowledge about choices on an intellectual level.

Think about this, it is obvious Darwinists are on the wrong side of
things. You can know this is so, if you too value knowledge about
choices highly.

regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

Mohammad,

Do you mean 'free will'?

PB

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Final judgement
    ... Darwinists say you don't need knowledge about choice, ... universe, maybe the universe could have turned out another way, but ... choices, look right through you, and only see your blood. ... might perform some experiment on you, like put chemicals in your blood, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Final judgement
    ... Darwinists say you don't need knowledge about choice, ... choices, look right through you, and only see your blood. ... might perform some experiment on you, like put chemicals in your blood, ... Of the thousands of Darwinist scientists, I can't point to any single ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: DuPont Has Knowingly Been Poisioning You For 18 Years READ!!!
    ... >DUPONT COVER UP CONFIRMED ... >Americans' Blood for 18 Years ... Evers was, by ... >DuPont has claimed that it does not know how the chemicals got there ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: OT: Hogfather
    ... All the business with Death saying the Sun would not have risen - only ... You can look at the universe in two ways. ... are no more than complex assemblages of chemicals, and love, fear, ... When Death says that The Sun will not rise, but a ball of burning gas ...
    (uk.media.radio.archers)
  • Re: There are NO intellligent Xtians, if we use Dimwit Dave..BUT>
    ... Universe that displays a personal touch ... years....can you tell the Group how over 100 specific chemicals, ... typical 1 to 4 words of a vile nature because you got intellectually ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)