Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Scott Draper <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:58:31 -0600
<<Science does not ever say that something occurred only through
natural means. >>
When science offers an "explanation", what other meaning is there
besides "this is sufficient to explain phenomonon X"?
<<Any/all/none of those could be the way things are.>>
It could be, but there is no evidence to suggest it. Why believe it?
<<Ah, such moral and intellectual superiority. Oh well.>>
Hmmm...ad hominem. Substitute for no counter-argument or
counter-evidence?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Matt Silberstein
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- References:
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: catshark
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: NashtOn
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: catshark
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Scott Draper
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: catshark
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Scott Draper
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Matt Silberstein
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Scott Draper
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- From: Matt Silberstein
- Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: News: Archbishop of Canterbury: stop teaching creationism
- Next by Date: Re: Atheists put their faith in ethical behavior
- Previous by thread: Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- Next by thread: Re: Dennett / Ruse Tiff Continues
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|