Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- From: "Windy" <pikaia@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2006 16:23:06 -0800
John Wilkins wrote:
It wouldn't have to be as bad as that. You could just start yourYes, but then Stephen Gould would have had to start his books with "I'm not a
paper with a general disclaimer.
For example, Daniel Dennett could have begun "Darwin's Dangerous
Idea" with, "I don't know much about evolution but ...."
And Michael Ruse could begin all his books with, "I'm not a
scientist but I'm going to tell you how scientists think."
historian or philosopher, but..."
It would have been funny as well if "The Selfish Gene" had started with
"I'm not a geneticist, but..."
-- w
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- References:
- a question about scholarly ethics
- From: TomS
- Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- From: Larry Moran
- Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- From: John Wilkins
- a question about scholarly ethics
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution and Observation Gap
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of ID?
- Previous by thread: Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- Next by thread: Re: a question about scholarly ethics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|