Re: Evolution and Observation Gap


"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142809388.071800.68000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mark VandeWettering wrote:
On 2006-03-19, topmind <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anyone wanna comment on this new write-up of mine?:

'Why Evolution is a "Theory" and not a "Fact"'

http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/observe.htm

It's not very good. In particular, it's basic premise, that facts need
to be "fully observed" to be called "fact" is an arbitrary and not
particularly useful definition, and directly at odds with how science
normally defines "fact". Nobody has ever observed Pluto complete an
orbit of the sun, but it is entirely irrational to claim that it is not
a fact that it does.

Perhaps a brown dwarf or small black hole comes around every few
hundred years and changes the orbit of Pluto or steels it away. Low
probability, but not zero.


Um, Pluto orbits the Sun. What we observe is a small speck of light moving
across the stellar field. We use inference to determine that Pluto is
gravitationally bound to the Sun.

You ignored the point, of course.

"The scientific method: hypothesis, prediction, observation, validation,
repeat."
http://zachriel.blogspot.com/2005/08/scientific-method.html





The rest of your essay does precisely what your previous essay on
ID did: argue irrelevencies. In general, genetic algorithms and
evolutionary computation aren't biological evolution, and nobody claims
that they are. Therefore, nothing abut these topics is at all
useful in deciding if evolution is a fact, just as you are incapable
of showing that ID is science by talking about SETI.

I think I did a pretty good job on that. You guys could not find a
consistent divider between SETI and ID-DNA-hunts. You couldn't, so
don't pretend you did. You only had waffling personal opinions.


Start with what is known:
* Life exists on at least one planet, Earth.
* That life is based on carbon and (liquid) water.
* That life has developed radio technology.
* Radio waves travel through interplanetary space.
* Carbon and water are common in the near universe.
* Complex organic chemicals spontaneously form in a variety of conditions
and have been found in deep space.
* There are billions of stars other than the Sun, and there are planets in
orbit about those stars.

Hypothesis:
* Life is not unique, and life on other planets may develop radio
technology.
* Drake Equation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

Observation:
* Scan the stellar neighborhood for narrow-band radio transmissions.
http://www.seti.org/

Result:
* No such signal has been found so far, which puts certain measurable limits
of certain parameters of the Drake Equation.

One could suppose that DNA could have a hidden message. One could suppose
you could read the entrails of chickens for clues to the future. However,
there is no evidence of either assertion. If aliens used DNA for sending
messages, there is no known mechanism for transmittal. What would be the
Drake Equation for the Search for ID-DNA-Messages?

However, as I have repeated to you many times; there is nothing stopping you
from analyzing the data in DNA for hidden messages. You have a computer. I'm
not really sure you have the mathematical background to distinguish a real
message from background noise, but hey, have at it.



Observation *should* be a requirement for "fact".


Direct observation of the Earth's movement was not required for scientists
to determine that the Earth does, in fact, move. Here's a really neat
prediction by Newton:

The Earth rotates, so it should bulge in the center. As the surface of the
Earth in the tropics is further from the Earth's center, it has less
gravity. Hence, a pendulum should move more slowly.

Sir Edmond Halley made a voyage to an island in the tropical South Atlantic
Ocean. During the voyage "he improved the sextant, collected a number of
valuable facts relative to the ocean and atmosphere, noted the equatorial
retardation of the pendulum, and made at St Helena on 7th November, 1677,
the first complete observation of a transit of Mercury. "

On a related note, the observation of the transit of Mercury across the
surface of the Sun by multiple observers would allow scientists to measure
the size of the Solar System, another profound inference. Halley's
measurement would lead to Captain Cook's voyage to Tahiti a century later to
observe the transit of Mercury and so compass the Universe.

Halley: "We therefore recommend again and again, to the curious
investigators of the stars to whom, when our lives are over, these
observations are entrusted, that they, mindful of our advice, apply
themselves to the undertaking of these observations vigorously. And for them
we desire and pray for all good luck, especially that they be not deprived
of this coveted spectacle by the unfortunate obscuration of cloudy heavens,
and that the immensities of the celestial spheres, compelled to more precise
boundaries, may at last yield to their glory and eternal fame."


If you have a formal
consensus definition of "fact", then let's see the damned thing.


fact, a piece of information presented as having objective reality
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/fact

theory, a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body
of principles offered to explain phenomena
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/theory

Evolution is a fact.
The Theory of Evolution is the scientific framework for explaining the facts
about evolution.
http://zachriel.blogspot.com/2005/08/evolution-defined.html



--
Zachriel, angel that rules over memory, presides over the planet Jupiter.
http://zachriel.blogspot.com/






Otherwise stop posing as if you are the center of the definition
universe.


Mark

-T-




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Problems with Natural evolution.
    ... Theist and Natural evolution for starters. ... scientists (and "creation "scientists" do not ... Not everything that lived left a fossil. ... aspect of the study of life.How life evolved through time. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Darwins Kool-Aid
    ... Enter Richard Dawkins. ... intelligent being may have created life on earth. ... product of "Darwinian evolution." ... Einstein among the ten most brilliant scientists who ever lived. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Why Evolution is a metaphysical hypothesis
    ... if the first living organism was beamed fully formed straight from heaven. ... My hypothesis is that that an intellect designed life and injected his ... If scientists ... and half billion years of evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mendel refutes evolution
    ... it's about how life behaves over eons. ... Abiogenesis is scarcely separate from evolution in reality. ... Vestigial features are a myth. ... He admitted that he believes scientists have an ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Real simple question on ID/aliens etc
    ... IDers have an honest opinion that life is too complex to have been ... Lack of evidence does not support the ID claim. ... for scientists where evidence is tangible, ... understand the distinction between evolution and abiogenesis. ...
    (talk.origins)