Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: "tsquare21" <tlthomas21@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Mar 2006 11:58:37 -0800
HI Diego
Interesting point about the age of man being only 6000 years old. This
is one of my infalibles (there are three), disproving evolution and
proving G-d.
As I attempted to point out many months ago (never could establish an
acceptable criteor) that to disprove one of these infalibles disproves
G-d.
So Deigo if you are serious in your inquires all you have to do (and
any one for that matter) is discover any evidence of man roaming this
earth longer then 10000 years. Sorry but carbon dating is not
acceptable.
One more note - The bible is written for man and only concerens the AGE
of man. This fact suports the different priestoric timlines we see in
the fosile record. Does this sugests that evolution is evidend with ID
over sight, never. It just proves that G-d re-created it all many
times. Need proof of this fact just go out most nights and look up.
Of course this test doesn't work for 90% of man because we try to erase
all majestic evidence of G-d (city lights are very effective erasers
:-).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: Dave
- Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: Robert Carnegie
- Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- References:
- I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: diegopig
- Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: Gordon Hill
- Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- From: diegopig
- I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- Prev by Date: Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- Next by Date: Re: Sorry, this subject is way off topic: Anti-virus software.
- Previous by thread: Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- Next by thread: Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- Index(es):