Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: Shane <remarcsdNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:54:19 +1100
On 15 Mar 2006 14:06:20 -0800, mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
DJT wrote:[...]
mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
snipping
They still called themselves Christian, and were the largest Christian
denomination in the US. What Kermit said was true. Those people devoutly
believed that the Bible supported their owning slaves, and the devoutly
believed they were following the way of Christ.
You don't define Christianity according to what people say, but what
Christ said.
I tend to agree with that, but others have differing opinions.
That's your error number one.
How was this my error? I wasn't one of the people supporting slavery.
Christ said that "many"
not a few, but "many" would "come in my name" (ie. call themselves a
Christian) and "Deceive many."
Yes, and there are many Creationists out there deceiving many people,
in the name of Christ.
Actually just the opposite. I've already proven on a number of
occasions that evolutionism is full of deceit.
2. Piltdown Man, defended by Sir Arthur Keith who put his reputation,
credentials, and honors behind it. He was knighted, given respect and
high esteem, yet failed on the simple matter that Piltdown was a hoax.
Think of the many books that he's written and published that influenced
the naive into thinking about the phoney Piltdown Man.
Don't worry about that one, Sir Arthur Keith got a number of things
wrong. Not only Piltdown, but he was completely wrong about Hitler
too, yet some loon is using Keith as evidence that Hitler was a
evolutionist. Amazing stuff.
[...]
4. Lyell was even cogitating on Piltdown Man as a fact, in his footnote
in "Antiquity of Man".
It's funny how gutenberg online doesn't have many of the evolutionists
books online, ones that do evolution great wreck.
So Lyell's book Antiquity of Man is not included in that category
then, as it is on Project Gutenberg.
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/6335
Also, Gutenberg is not the only repository of onlinbe books. Your lack
of research is very entertaining.
Evolutionists like to hide their dirt under the carpet.
Well now we know where JM does his resaerch, no wonder his conclusions
are almost invariably wrong.
--
Shane
the truth will set you free.
.
- References:
- Evolutionist for Racism
- From: mccoy
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: unrestrained_hand
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: mccoy
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: Lee Oswald Ving
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: mccoy
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: Dana Tweedy
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: mccoy
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: DJT
- Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- From: mccoy
- Evolutionist for Racism
- Prev by Date: Re: I'd like a better understanding of the debate
- Next by Date: Re: Speculative Design Hypothesis (with predictions) 2nd draft
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- Next by thread: Re: Evolutionist for Racism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|