Re: A REAL Debate
- From: Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:20:16 -0500
In article <1141820411.122356.235450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Wombat" <trigby@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FiveLongYears wrote:
I read this group every day. Sometimes it's because I want to learn
from what others are learning and sometimes for a chuckle. Real
questions are posted, and I see creationist dance around them as if
they were at a ho-down. ( SP?) So here is a question....
Is it possible to have one member from each opposing sides, and have a
REAL-PROPER-FORMAL-CIVIL debate?
One member from the Creation frame of mind, one member from the
Evolution frame of mind, along with one moderator.
No other person is allowed to post, and if they do they will be
ignored. Come on people.... This is an opportunity to have what this
group lacks: Rational, logical, and well planned arguments and answers.
FLY
Who would concider it?
It was tried a few years ago. Nowhere Man (creationist) several times
debated Lilith and was creamed each time. He then tried to fix the
rules, debated Lucas and still got creamed.
Wombat
NWM was complaining that Lilith's posts were too detailed among other
things.
--
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any
charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgement of his
peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totali-
tarian government whether Nazi or Communist." -- W. Churchill, Nov 21, 1943
.
- References:
- A REAL Debate
- From: FiveLongYears
- Re: A REAL Debate
- From: Wombat
- A REAL Debate
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions the TO faq ought to answer
- Next by Date: Re: OT, attn Seattle Howlers: Braggin' Corner
- Previous by thread: Re: A REAL Debate
- Next by thread: Re: A REAL Debate
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
