Re: Why the theory of evolution is ontologically impossible

romain_a2 wrote:
Your intentions are not of learning or teaching something but simply
reassuring your ego that it is still master of your identity,
unfortunately.

When you talk, you don't think about love and sharing, you only think
about yourself: "what's in it for me? do I intimidate him? how do I
look in front of others?"

You're not trying to make me understand your point of view, but rather
disproving mine. I don't appreciate that, thus I will stop arguing with
you.


I am sure that the poster is well chagrined.


Why did you get involved in the discussion in the first place?

The usenet is an open and public place for discussions. Unless you note
that a discussion is closed, then there is no reason to get snippety
when a poster joins in. Closed discussions are usually for a stated
purpose anyway, such as a debate that was pre-arranged with the general
consent of the group.


I won't
do you the privilege of deciding when to stop the debate between me and
you. I am deciding to end it now, because I feel I made enough efforts
to share a learning experience with you, but obviously you didn't get
it....maybe in another debate, that threatens less your sens of
identity.


So you are failing him because he doesn't accept your teaching?


I shall continue to discuss this subject with any other member however.

"Eventually when the opponent is challenged or questioned it means the
victim's investment and thus, his intelligence is questioned. No one
can accept that, not even to themselves." -Guy Ritchie



--
Freeper:

"We need to change the law and make it legal to hunt liberals with dogs. "

Me:

I understand you are being flippant, but you are coming across as stupid.

Freeper:

I wasn't being flippant. I mean it.

.