Re: 5 reasons to chuck Darwinism

Intelligent design doesn't argue anything at all. It argues AGAINST
anything. Its only argument is that some things are unknown so that any
explanation is possible. Witchcraft, voodoo, astrology...all are
sciences under intelligent design since all answer questions that
science itself can't.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
    ... In fact, I argue ... The fact that non professionals risk less than ... I argue that sbe type discourse is invaluable to the sciences because ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Letter to the Editor: Theres no reason why school cant include intelligent design
    ... sciences to that of mushrooms - they only require darkness and manure ... There's no reason why school can't include intelligent design ... intelligent design in public schools. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: In the News: Gonzalez to hold press conference
    ... "Department Position on Evolution and "Intelligent Design" ... "The faculty in the Department of Biological Sciences is committed to ... This commitment carries with it unwavering support for academic ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution is NOT random
    ... As you all know, I regard "intelligent design" as crypto-, or not ... The only valid criticism of ID that I know of is that it cannot be ... of ID that is made within the sciences remains rhetorical. ... why falsifiability has been removed from evolutionary theory is because ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Defending Intelligent Design (long)
    ... > I will argue the Intelligent Design side. ... > "Evolution" means multiple things to multiple people. ... The theory of evolution makes no claim about supernatural forces. ...
    (talk.origins)