Re: the meaning of the holocaust for scientists



Ray Martinez wrote:

<snip>

The post is typical Dana: ACLU.

We both know Dana is a pathological liar. He claims to be a Christian.
Everything he says exposes himself not to be as such.

Ray, I get so confused trying to keep up with your "psychology". Is is
these qualities above of which you are most guilty: pathological liar,
claims to be Christian, not such?

My real intent is
the atheists here at T.O. They are not stupid, they know Dana is just
trying to misrepresent the enemy - this is why they never call him on
his obvious lies. If Dana was a real Christian he would be treated like
me. Atheists and theists are mortal enemies. Here at T.O. they are cozy
= one is not as such.

Mortal enemies, Ray? This theme of yours again -- your need to be hated.
How incredibly childish. Please don't project your need to be the
subject of hate and disgust onto other people.

Ray, did it never occur to you that you get the reaction that you do not
because you're a "Christian", but for some other reason? You are not
ridiculed because you are a Christian. You are ridiculed because your
capacity for logic and reason seems severely underdeveloped, and you
seem to revel in that.

My hook is in Dana's jaw, this is why he follows me around and
stalker-posts. Dana is inflamed with the truth and the only way he can
obtain any satisfaction is put on sheeps clothing while arguing
standard atheistic nonsense. The real issue is: Why do atheists never
stand their own ground by saying ToE is supported by theists ? Answer:
Because ToE is atheist philosophy otherwise and falsified: they NEED
"theists."

See, here's a good example where your "logic" completely flies apart.
You make it seem that "athiest philosophy" is so weak even to athiests
that they recognize a necessity to have it bolstered from the theist
realm. That is complete idiocy, and simply shows an inability on your
part to even begin to understand people who have different beliefs than
you do.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dana Tweedy: King of Rats
    ... complete saint compared to Dana Tweedy (Christian who argues Atheist ... But Ray, you are a liar. ... Christian who accepts the science of evolution. ... Dana is wholeheartedly embraced and protected by all Atheists and the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Case Against Dana Tweedy & Cowardly Creationists
    ... The evidence is crystal clear that you took my words out of context, Ray. ... The Group cannot admit that Dana is brazen liar, ... said Dana is not a Christian, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Case Against Dana Tweedy & Cowardly Creationists
    ... said Dana is not a Christian, ... with atheists invulnerable logic says one group is not as such. ... Why all this anger directed at Dana Tweedy specifically? ... Discussing a fossil that is unarguably transitional between humans and non-human apes would prove Ray wrong, which proves Doctor Scott wrong, which proves God wrong. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sean: "Im an immutabilist"
    ... Lucid people may actually believe something along these lines, Ray. ... (Trans: Because Mark cites interpretations of scripture with which I ... be a real Christian or is of nefarious intent. ... Atheists: no evidence exists supporting the existence of God. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dana Tweedy: King of Rats
    ... I should have focussed on the King of Liars - Dana Tweedy. ... Christian Clergy as a matter of routine business. ... Divine, Resurrection, Bible as evidence, guided evolution, while ... Dana is wholeheartedly embraced and protected by all Atheists and the ...
    (talk.origins)