Re: the meaning of the holocaust for scientists


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141185650.129286.153710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ken Rode wrote:
Ray Martinez wrote:

<>snip>

Evidence is a ploy and easily denied and
manipulated when the needs of hate are unquenchable.

Ray, is this what you are most guilty of, or am I reading your rants
regarding modern psychology incorrectly?

Ken:

You abandoned the psychology discussion - I answered your lengthy
reply.

Hey, Ray, you've run away from any number of "discussions", including the
one about fossil KNM WT 15000. Are you ever going to address that fossil?


By misrepresenting and ignoring what I wrote to be a "rant" you are
essentially admitting the inability to refute.

Ken did not misrepresent, or ignore what you wrote. He's pointing out one
of your more obvious logical lapses.


Stop being appalled with Holocaust denial and look in the mirror and
see what your kind does with the overwhelming evidence for God in
physical reality.

Perhaps you could present some of this "overwheming evidence for God in
physical reality". Historians can point to a great deal of physical
evidence of the Holocaust. What evidence do you offer for "God in
physical reality"?

We know the Holocaust is a fact

Because of the preponderance of evidence.

= we know God in
reality is a fact.

No, we don't "know" that. I and many others believe that God exists, but
that belief is based on faith, and willingness to trust in our feelings. We
don't have any physical evidence that God exists, and for a person of faith,
no evidence is required.

Holocaust denial = Darwinism does the same with God.

Actually, "Darwinism" does not deny the existance of God. God (or any
other supernatural being) is simply not relevant to the scientific study of
evolutionary processes. Ironically, denying evolution is much closer to
holocaust denial. Both involve ignoring a great deal of evidence.


DJT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: CD Sales Down
    ... As long as the other believer and I can agree that in concept One God is God then we have to be believing in the "same" God if there is only One. ... Suppose guy A believes his god created the universe and then abandoned it. ... Neither guy can or will show you evidence to support his view. ...
    (alt.guitar)
  • Re: Mission Impossible: Having a Substantive Debate with Conservatives
    ... My book lays out how Reaganomics transformed America into a nation of ... You might try asking for evidence ... appeal to tradition (similar to the bandwagon fallacy): ... disasters occur because God punishes non-believers; ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: In the beginning?
    ... you need to supply that evidence. ... I can't prove that God exists. ... The fact that we all were given life by the same Life Giver, ... Transitional forms like Morganucodon (205 Mya) illustrate how mammals ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: CD Sales Down
    ... god has completely different attributes than yours. ... I'm ready to hear the evidence for your god :-) ... This may be a person's reasonfor believing. ... True objectivity is an ideal. ...
    (alt.guitar)
  • Re: Comprehending Steven J.
    ... to be the *factually* inerrant word of God. ... "literal sense" scripture and common sense and science. ... be factual by supposition and not by evidence. ... as is the case with Dr. Miller. ...
    (talk.origins)