Re: What's with all the punnery?
- From: "SRNissen" <soren.nissen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Feb 2006 09:57:43 -0800
r norman wrote:
On 22 Feb 2006 22:50:04 -0800, "Marc" <mbuhler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
just one bit of word-play using perhaps several words as
compared with three or four meaningful paragraphs in
a serious debate. The replies are likewise just as quick
(especially in this group - look at this thread!).
A lot faster perhaps, but it is more difficult to post a short message
with a really clever bit than it is to post a very long serious and
technical message in your area of specialization.
Ah, but harder still is it to write a long and serious message in an
area outside of your specialization.
Or in other words, I have *no* idea why I hang out at T.O, I do
materials science, for Gods sake!
- Søren
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's with all the punnery?
- From: Robert Grumbine
- Re: What's with all the punnery?
- References:
- What's with all the punnery?
- From: SRNissen
- Re: What's with all the punnery?
- From: Robert Grumbine
- Re: What's with all the punnery?
- From: Marc
- Re: What's with all the punnery?
- From: r norman
- What's with all the punnery?
- Prev by Date: Re: Turn out the lights, the "Teach the controversy" party's over - (CIDW)
- Next by Date: Re: CSI rebuttal?
- Previous by thread: Re: What's with all the punnery?
- Next by thread: Re: What's with all the punnery?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|