Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: "John Drayton" <bitbucket55@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Feb 2006 03:33:43 -0800
spintronic wrote:
This is breaking down into an altercation.
It needn't. Just be honest about why you are here.
It makes thing a lot easier.
And don't be a smug know-all.
For example, on one hand you insist people take your questions
at face value, and yet when they are taken at face value and
a reasonable and viable answer is given, you respond with:
"Anyways, lot of people are saying it did it pretty much the same
way it does it now. How little you guys know."
Your first question was:
"Could some clever person please go through the process with me
of how the first dna molecule replicated itself."
And a number of quite reasonable answers were given by a number
of people, eg from David Jensen:
"Probably in pretty much the same fashion as modern DNA does"
How can you fault that answer?
John Drayton;
I don't see where I've been rude or insulted you.
I simply called you on your intentions in these posts.
I meant further above! as in ^ up.
Where? How about quoting?
I pointed out that you came here with an agenda. How
is that rude?
You may be educated, but you are not openminded.
You've declared the scenarios "statistical impossibilities"
Care to show your calculations? Just rough figures will
be fine.
We have 3 events a,b,& c,
Event c is dependant upon events a & b happening first.
Yet c is also the precursor to a & b.
Then event c cannot happen.
Care to put a name to these events, a, b, and c?
Ill put the numbers in when someone first defines what im putting
numbers into.
Too late! You've *already* assigned a number: you've claimed
it is zero. Are you taking this back now?
<snip>
--
John Drayton
.
- References:
- 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: Nicholas
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: John Harshman
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: David Jensen
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: Elmer
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: Marc
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- From: spintronic
- 1st D.N.A Replication
- Prev by Date: Re: Humans did not have gill slits
- Next by Date: Re: Things I've Noticed About Intelligent Design/Creationist Proponents
- Previous by thread: Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- Next by thread: Re: 1st D.N.A Replication
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|